Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/910,090

AMINE COMPOUND HAVING FUSED RING, AND ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE COMPRISING SAME

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Sep 08, 2022
Examiner
YANG, JAY LEE
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sfc Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 893 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
78 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Examiner’s Note The Office has relied on national phase publication US 2022/0017544 A1 as the English equivalent of WIPO publication WO 2020/045924 A1 (herein referred to as “Yoon et al.”). Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: The claim fails to conclude with a period. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. The claim, which is dependent on Claim 1, recites numerous compounds which are not encompassed by the scope of any one of Formulae A and B. Examples include the following (among others): PNG media_image1.png 158 138 media_image1.png Greyscale . Notice that R1 and R2 must be “bonded to each other to form an alicyclic or aromatic monocyclic or polycyclic ring” as required in Claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, and 4-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yoon et al. (WO 2020/045924 A1). Yoon et al. discloses the following compound: PNG media_image2.png 366 440 media_image2.png Greyscale (page 29) Q1 = substituted C12 heteroaryl group (substituted dibenzofuran), R1-2 = (hydrogen or) unsubstituted C1-30 alkyl group which are bonded to each other to form an alicyclic polycyclic ring, X = O, and Ar1-2 = substituted C6 aryl group (substituted phenyl) or Applicant’s Structural Formula 1 (with l = 0 and R3 = unsubstituted C6 aryl group (phenyl)) of Applicant’s Formula B. Yoon et al. further discloses an organic electroluminescent (EL) device for the construction of displays (with “a wide viewing angle”) comprising the following layers ([0003], [0007], [0098]): substrate (1), anode (2), hole-injecting layer (5), hole-transporting layer (6) (inherently electron-blocking), light-emitting layer (7), electron-transporting layer (8), and cathode (4) (Fig. 2; [0023]). Its inventive compounds serve as material comprising the hole-injecting, hole-transporting, and/or light-emitting layer ([0021], [0143]). Yoon et al. discloses that the organic layers are formed via methods such as solution coating including spin coating ([0084]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY L YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1137. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 6am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer A Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY YANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 08, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604660
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598906
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590101
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590085
Organic Light Emitting Compound And Organic Light Emitting Device Including Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588407
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+2.9%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month