Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/912,449

METHOD FOR RECEIVING PSCCH BY PS UE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Examiner
ZHANG, ZHENSHENG
Art Unit
2474
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
287 granted / 380 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
419
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
71.6%
+31.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 380 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/24/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments regarding the 103 rejection have been considered and are moot because they do not apply to the new ground of rejection in the current office action, as the combination of Beale and Soe teaches each and every limitation in the amended claims 1, 4-7. Detailed response can be found in the rejection section. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beale (US 20230046262) in view of Seo (US 20210185651). Regarding claim 1, Beale discloses a method comprising: receiving, by a user equipment (UE), bandwidth part (BWP) information ([0109-0110], enhanced for a power saving mechanism, a UE is provided by RRC signaling a bandwidth part (BWP) for SL transmissions (SL BWP) and a resource pool); and monitoring, by the UE, control information a first BWP based on the BWP information ([0110], the UE only needs to monitor those sub-channels that have been indicated, reducing the search space and number of blind decodes necessary at the UE, PSCCH monitoring at UE), wherein the BWP information indicates at least one of a starting position of the first BWP area and a number of contiguous resource blocks (RBs) ([0110-111], fig. 10 shows an example of resource pool configuration in a sidelink BWP 100. Each instance of the resource pool 101 (labeled A to G) consists of four sub-channels 102 and ten slots 104 starting from the second slot of the resource pool periodicity, where the resource pool periodicity 106 is sixteen slots; i.e. the start of each instance of the resource pool 101 is sixteen slots from the start of the previous resource pool instance), wherein the UE is power saving user equipment (PS UE) ([0110][0113], those skilled in the art would appreciate that a BWP (which is well known in the art as a power saving scheme for a UE); power saving state indicates that a UE is a PS UE). Beale does not explicitly disclose wherein the first BWP for monitoring of the PS UE is set differently from a second BWP for monitoring of the PS UE, and wherein, among PS UEs and non-PS UEs, only the PS UEs are allowed to perform monitoring in the first BWP. Seo discloses wherein the first BWP for monitoring of the PS UE is set differently from a second BWP for monitoring of the PS UE (Seo, [0223-233], the network may indicate the BD/CE limit for each numerology applied in the power saving mode and the normal mode using higher layer signaling, or the BD/CE limit by mode may be predefined according to numerology; different limits may be applied to the configurable BD/CE limit according to the power saving mode), wherein, among PS UEs and non-PS UEs, only the PS UEs are allowed to perform monitoring in the first BWP. (Seo, [0230], when this is linked with power saving, the BD/CE limit for each cell and/or for each BWP may be applied only in the power saving mode or only according to the indication of the network; [0258-59], the shadow BWP may refer to a BWP for reducing power consumption and latency due to BWP changing and may refer to a BWP that does not operate in the normal mode and may operate only in the power saving mode. For example, the shadow BWP may refer to a BWP that the UE should assume, starting from a time of entering the power saving mode). Seo also discloses monitoring, by the UE, control information a first BWP based on the BWP information (Seo, [0233], the UE may perform blind decoding or monitoring by applying the BD/CE limit defined for the BWP in the corresponding BWP indicated by the network). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to combine the teachings of exchanging BWP information as given by Beale with the teachings of setting blind encoding limits given by Seo. The motivation for doing so would have been to provide a method and device for reducing downlink control channel complexity for power saving (Seo, [0004]). Claims 4, 6 and 7 are rejected same as claim 1 noting that Beale discloses processors, transceivers, computer readable medium and memory (Beale, fig. 3, [0053]). Regarding claim 5, Beale and Seo disclose the UE of claim 4, wherein the PS UE communicates with at least one of another UE, a UE related to an autonomous driving vehicle, a base station (BS), or a network (Beale, fig. 1, UE communicates with a base station). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beale in view of Seo further in view of Li (WO 2017000376). Regarding claim 3, Beale and Seo disclose the method of claim 1, Beale and Seo do not explicitly disclose wherein a size of the first BWP is configured in proportion to a number of PS UEs. Li discloses a size of the first BWP is configured in proportion to a number of PS UEs (Li, page 5, 2nd para., the resource block group size (or bandwidth part or BWP) allocated is inversely proportional to the number of the terminals). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the time of effective filing to combine the teachings of exchanging BWP information as given by Beale and Seo with the teachings of configuring the size of the BWP given by Li. The motivation for doing so would have been to allocate the bandwidth based on the number of UEs for fairness. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHENSHENG ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1985. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached on 571-272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHENSHENG ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2474
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 28, 2025
Response Filed
May 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592767
METHODS AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING SEAMLESS CONNECTIVITY IN A CALL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574267
DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL MULTI-SLOT BUNDLING INDICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568426
COMMUNICATION METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM OF AMBIENT BACKSCATTERING BASED ON WI-FI SIGNALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12538374
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION DURING FAST MCG LINK RECOVERY PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12526686
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING V2X COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A VEHICLE AND A RECEIVING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month