Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/913,130

A GRIPPING TOOL, A SYSTEM AND A CLAMPING TOOL, AN EXCHANGE STATION, AND A METHOD OF HANDLING OBJECTS USING THE SYSTEM OR CLAMPING TOOL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 20, 2022
Examiner
TIGHE, BRENDAN P
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fynbo Technology A/S
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
435 granted / 576 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
617
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 576 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-18 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation: wherein the at least one gripping element comprises a recess arranged in an external surface, wherein the recess is configured to engage a matching flange on an exchange station, wherein each arm comprises one mounting position for the at least one gripping element arranged in the top side, wherein the at least one gripping element is releasably connected to that arm via a quick-release coupling, wherein the at least one gripping element comprises a recess arranged in an external surface, wherein the recess is configured to engage a matching flange with complementary features on an exchange station. it is unclear whether the first mentioned recess and the second mentioned recess in the gripping element are the same recess or different recesses. it is unclear whether the first mentioned external surface and the second mentioned external surface of the gripping element are the same surface or different surfaces. it is unclear whether the first mentioned matching flange and the second mentioned matching flange are the same recess or different recesses. it is unclear whether the first mentioned exchange station and the second mentioned exchange station are the same exchange station or different exchange stations. Regarding Claims 2-4 and 6-18: the claims are rejected for depending from a rejected claim Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Patent publications US 4604787 A, US 4636135 A, US 4685850 A, US 4706372 A, US 4852242 A, US 4913617 A, and US 4979284 A have been cited by the examiner as pertinent to the applicant’s disclosure because they teach: robotic arms with exchangeable grippers having a rack for storing the unused grippers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRENDAN P TIGHE whose telephone number is 571-272-4872. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday, 7:00-5:30 EST If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SAUL RODRIGUEZ can be reached on 571-272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRENDAN P TIGHE/Examiner, Art Unit 3652 /SAUL RODRIGUEZ/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 24, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Nov 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600514
NEST REMOVER AND STERILE CHAMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595636
BACK-DRAG BUCKET ACCESSORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589955
Transfer Device Comprising Automatic Opening Unit of Box Cover
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588465
SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565389
Sample Conveyance System and Sample Conveyance Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+19.7%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 576 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month