Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/913,239

AN ON-SITE COFFEE ROASTING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 21, 2022
Examiner
ALEXANDER, REGINALD
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Griin Roasting LTD
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

76%
Career Allow Rate
1532 granted / 2021 resolved
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 pending
2044
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 104-110 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 15 October 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 91-103 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jacobson et al. ‘906 in view of Gharpurey et al. ‘262. There is disclosed Jacobson a coffee bean roaster comprising: a resonant cavity 128 (para. 0091); a heating unit, including a microwave oscillator 114 and a beam-steerer (phase shifter, para. 0108); sensing unit (para. 0138); and a control unit (para. 0137); wherein the control unit is configured to control the microwave oscillator and the beam-steerer (microwave intensity and direction control, para. 0137). Gharpurey discloses that it is old and well known to make use of sensors 240 and a control unit 120 to control a microwave oscillator 322A, 322B and beam-steerer (phase shifter) 230, wherein the control unit is configured to control the microwave oscillator and beam-steerer in order to regulate the spatial position of microwaves according to data received from the sensing unit. It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to substitute the control and sensing units of Jacobson with the control and sensing units disclosed in Gharpurey, in order to provide control of the microwave intensity and direction in direct response to sensed temperature data within a heating chamber. In regards to claim 92 Gharpurey discloses that the microwave oscillator is of the solid-state type. In regards to claims 94 and 95 paragraph 0108 of Jacobson describes the phase-shifter (beam steerer) as being rotatable and capable of reflecting a wave. Thus, it appears that the beam-steerer can be characterized as a deflector and powered by a motor or the equivalent thereof for movement and positioning. In regards to claim 96, paragraph 0091 of Jacobson discloses that both antennas and a waveguide are connected to the microwave oscillator. In regards to claim 97, Gharpurey discloses that the sensing unit 240 is a thermal sensor. In regards to claim 98, paragraphs 0137 and 0138 of Jacobson disclose that a microphone is provided to detect sounds produced by the beans during a roasting cycle. In regards to claims 99 and 100, paragraphs 0137 and 0138 of Jacobson describe data received from the sensory unit and how it is used to regulate the heating unit according to target points. In regards to claims 101 and 102, Jacobson discloses the use of a blower 150 to generate a flow of air as well as a heating chart with desired temperature ranges. In regards to claim 103, Jacobson discloses use of the roaster with a grinder (fig. 8) and coffee brewer (para. 0158). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art reference to Leindecker is cited for its disclosure of controllable beam steerer and sensor unit. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINALD L. ALEXANDER whose telephone number is (571)272-1395. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ibrahime Abraham can be reached at 571-270-5569. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /REGINALD ALEXANDER/ Examiner Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 21, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 24, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12590708
DOUGH PREPARATION APPARATUS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582259
METHOD OF MAKING INFANT FORMULA AND RELATED DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575694
COFFEE MACHINE WITH DYNAMIC FLOW AND TEMPERATURE CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575693
SMART BEVERAGE SYSTEM, APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575578
Automated Food/Feed Mass Transport System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.0%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2021 resolved cases by this examiner