Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/913,776

CINNAMOYL AMINO ACID COMPOUND AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Examiner
BARSKY, JARED
Art Unit
1628
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
China Pharmaceutical University
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
461 granted / 915 resolved
-9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
88 currently pending
Career history
1003
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 2, 2026, has been entered. Claim of Foreign Priority As noted in the previous Office Actions, Applicant’s claim of foreign priority has not been perfected by filing an English translation of the foreign priority documents. As such, Applicant’s co-publication of March 30, 2021, qualifies as prior art. Response to Arguments In totality, the examiner finds Applicant’s arguments persuasive. The sole prior art reference cited below can be overcome by perfecting priority, as explained above. Claim Objections Claim 1 recites “a neurodegenerative diseases” wherein diseases is plural. This should state “a neurodegenerative disease.” Further, the examiner recommends adding the phrase “to a subject in need thereof” after the word “administering” in claim 1. This will make clear that such method requires an existing condition. Claim 3 should recite “wherein the drug is administered orally or by injection” rather than “is taken” after reciting “administering” in independent claim 1. This will make the claims more consistent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In particular, the claim refers to, in part, “L-phenylalanine” while the structure is not limited to the L enantiomer. Clarification is requested. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xiao-Long et al., “Optimization of N-Phenylpropenoyl-L-amino Acids as Potent and Selective Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitors for Parkinson’s Disease,” J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 7760−7777. Xiao-Long teaches the claimed compound to directly bind to iNOS and oral administration of 1 and 2 mg/kg exerted preventive effects on loss of dopaminergic neurons. See Abstract. The same dosage also show a reparative effect on dopaminergic neurons. It is a promising candidate for treating PD. As such, a POSA would immediately envisage orally administering the claimed compound to a subject with PD. As such, claims 1 and 3 are anticipated by the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JARED D BARSKY whose telephone number is (571)272-2795. The examiner can normally be reached on 9-5 M-F. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Clark can be reached on 571-272-1310. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JARED BARSKY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2022
Application Filed
May 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Aug 01, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Dec 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12576152
TOPICAL COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569458
METHOD TO DELIVER ANTIFIBRINOLYTIC DRUGS TO MITIGATE DAMAGE TO THE BRAIN CAUSED BY CONCUSSIVE IMPACT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564582
USE OF PRIDOPIDINE FOR TREATING DYSTONIAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558397
COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTION, AMELIORATION, OR TREATMENT OF URINATION-RELATED DISEASES COMPRISING CEPHALOTOCIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12558349
METHODS OF TREATING INFECTIONS IN OVERWEIGHT AND OBESE PATIENTS USING ANTIBIOTICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+23.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month