Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 17/913,788

Device for the Generative Manufacturing of Components, in Particular by Means of Selective Melting or Sintering

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Priority
Mar 23, 2020 — DE 10 2020 107 925.7 +2 more
Examiner
SMITH JR., JIMMY R
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kurtz GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
284 granted / 439 resolved
At TC average
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+43.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
485
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 439 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
The arguments and amendments submitted 01/08/2026 have been considered. In light of amendments made, the prior USC § 112(b) rejections are hereby withdrawn. The merits of the claim are discussed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claims 1-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1, lines 14-16 recite the new limitation that “each swivel arm is configured such that, while directing the respective light beam onto the processing area for selective melting or sintering, the swivel arm is pivotable only around a respective vertical swivel axis", but Applicant has not pointed out specifically where the recitation indicated in italics is supported in the written specification. Paragraph 0019 in the PG Pub for the instant specification is the only description related to the new recitation and is limited to the statement that “The swivel arms can be designed to only swivel around the vertical axis” without any description that this feature is limited to while directing the respective light beam onto the processing area for selective melting or sintering and/or how the apparatus is structurally configured so that each swivel arm only swivels around the vertical axis while directing the respective light beam onto the processing area for selective melting or sintering. Therefore, paragraph 0019 and the surrounding paragraphs do not provide support for broadening of the feature that the swivel arm is pivotable only around a respective vertical swivel axis while directing the respective light beam onto the processing area for selective melting or sintering. Furthermore, although Applicant points to Figures 1-2 as providing support, neither figure has any visual indications supporting the new limitation. Lastly, there is nothing in Figure 2 and its accompanying description that supports Applicant’s assertion that Figure 2 illustrates the apparatus while directing the respective light beam onto the processing area for selective melting or sintering. In view of the above considerations, the recitation on lines 14-16 is unsupported new matter. Dependent claims fall herewith. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments submitted 01/08/2026 have been fully considered and have been addressed above. Although claim 1 is not taught or suggested by the prior art of record, as indicated in Sections 6-7 of the previous office action, the claims are not presently allowable for the reasons described in Sections 3-4 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIM R SMITH whose telephone number is (303)297-4318. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JRS/ Examiner Art Unit 1745 /JIMMY R SMITH JR./Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jul 01, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 27, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 27, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12611841
METHOD FOR PRODUCING REGENERATED CELLULOSE-BASED THREADS AND FELTED CLOTHS
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12600091
OPTICAL SHAPING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598895
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570043
POWDER BED FUSION RECOATER ASSEMBLY
2y 7m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570359
VEHICLE PILLAR REINFORCEMENT USING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.4%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 439 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month