DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Status
Claims 16-30 are pending. Claims 1-15 are previously canceled. Claims 16, 18-23, 25-26, and 28 are amended. Claims 17, 24, 27, and 29-30 are previously presented.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 8/29/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
In response to arguments regarding the objection to the drawings, the drawings are objected to because several components are shown as empty boxes without descriptive text labels. The concern is not whether one may be able to read the specification and understand the figures, or that the reference characters are mentioned in the specification, but rather that one is able to understand the drawings, in particular the contents of the empty boxes, without having to refer to the specification. Applicant has not amended the drawings to include descriptive text labels for the empty boxes, and therefore the objections to the drawings are maintained.
In response to arguments on pages 13-14 of the remarks that secondary reference GARNIER does not disclose the recitation “one of the first and second battery modules is charged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules”, it is submitted that GARNIER discloses the balancing between the modules occurs during charging (¶ 0116, 0132), and the balancing includes discharging at least one module with a higher amount of charge, wherein at least one module with a lower amount of charge is charged with the power from the at least one module with a higher amount of charge (¶ 0111, 0133-0135, 0141). It follows that the at least one module with the higher amount of charge that is discharging during the charging phase will effectively be “charged less quickly” that the at least one other battery module having a lower charge amount. It is therefore maintained that GARNIER teaches this recitation within the broadest reasonable interpretation, and LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches the method for reducing imbalances as applied to claim 1 and the redox flow battery system as applied to claim 23.
Drawings
The drawings are objected for containing “unlabeled generic box elements” (See 6, Figure 1; 7, 8, Figure 2; 11, Figure 3; 7, Figure 4; 7, 8, 15, Figure 5; 7, 8, 16, 17, Figure 6; etc.). Correction is required in accordance with 37 CFR 1.83 as stated below.
Further, 37 CFR 1.83 – Content of Drawing:
(a) The drawing in a nonprovisional application must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. However, conventional features disclosed in the description and claims, where their detailed illustration is not essential for a proper understanding of the invention, should be illustrated in the drawing in the form of a graphical drawing symbol or a labeled representation (e.g., a labeled rectangular box). In addition, tables that are included in the specification and sequences that are included in sequence listings should not be duplicated in the drawings.
(b) When the invention consists of an improvement on an old machine the drawing must when possible exhibit, in one or more views, the improved portion itself, disconnected from the old structure, and also in another view, so much only of the old structure as will suffice to show the connection of the invention therewith.
(c) Where the drawings in a nonprovisional application do not comply with the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the examiner shall require such additional illustration within a time period of not less than two months from the date of the sending of a notice thereof. Such corrections are subject to the requirements of § 1.81(d).
[31 FR 12923, Oct. 4, 1966; 43 FR 4015, Jan. 31, 1978; paras. (a) and (c) revised, 60 FR 20195, Apr. 25, 1995, effective June 8, 1995; para. (a) revised, 69 FR 56481, Sept. 21, 2004, effective Oct. 21, 2004; para. (a) revised, 78 FR 62368, Oct. 21, 2013]
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claim(s) 16-18, 21, 23-24, and 28-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEE (US PG Pub 2011/0089898; cited in previous office action) in view of UNDERWOOD (WO 2020/030762A1; cited on IDS; cited in previous office action) and further in view of GARNIER (US PG Pub 2014/0035531; cited in previous office action).
Regarding claim 16, LEE discloses a method for reducing imbalances that occur during charging and discharging (¶ 0053: the two-stage charge equalization apparatus according to the present invention performs charge equalization by controlling charge in the battery cell in order to overcome the voltage difference between batteries which can be caused when charging or discharging the batteries in the battery string) of a battery system (¶ 0010: charge equalization apparatus which performs charge equalization in a series-connected battery string), the method comprising:
providing the battery system with:
at least two battery modules (1141, 1142, Fig. 1), and a controller (2200, Fig. 2), the at least two battery modules being connected in series (¶ 0047: a battery string 1140 is divided into M battery modules 1141 to 1146 having K battery cells connected in series);
for each battery module of the at least two battery modules, a DC-DC converter (1121, 1122, Fig. 1), wherein a respective terminal of each DC-DC converter is connected to a respective battery module (¶ 0048: Each of M battery modules 1141 to 1146 dividing the battery string 1140 into each module is connected to …. DC-DC converters 1121 to 1126 composing a second stage DC-DC converter 1120. Therefore, M battery modules are equipped with …. M DC-DC converters), and a second terminal of each DC-DC converter is connected to a common DC bus (¶ 0048: All inputs of the second stage DC-DC converter 1120 are connected to an output of the first stage DC-DC converter 1110 in parallel as shown in FIG. 1; the common bus is the connection between the stage DC-DC converter 1120 and the first stage DC-DC converter 1110); and
a further power conversion system (1110, Fig. 1) connected to the common DC bus (as shown in Fig. 1), and wherein the controller is connected to the further power conversion system and to the DC-DC converters so that the controller controls the further power conversion system and the DC-DC converters (¶ 0057: The charge equalization is carried out on the low-charged battery cell by allowing the microprocessor 2200 to measure the voltage of the individual battery under the control of the multiplexer 2110, determine low-charged battery cell based on the voltage of the individual battery and control the switch module 1130, the main switch of each DC-DC converter 1121 to 1126 for each module in the second stage and the main switch of the first stage DC-DC converter 1110); and
during a discharging of the battery system (¶ 0053: balancing can occur during discharging), actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module (¶ 0053: the two-stage charge equalization apparatus according to the present invention performs charge equalization by controlling charge in the battery cell in order to overcome the voltage difference between batteries which can be caused when charging or discharging the batteries), in terms of the controlled variable thereof (¶ 0026: charge equalization of the battery string is preferably performed if a difference in measurement voltage of the battery cell is higher than the certain value), to cause one DC-DC converter to dissipate an amount of electrical energy from the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is discharged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result (¶ 0078: (b) selecting a low charged battery cell based on the voltage measured upon performing the charge equalization of the battery string (s50); …. and (e) charging the low-charge battery cell by operating the first DC-DC converter; since the voltage difference which prompts the equalization may occur during discharge, it follows that the low-charge battery cell receiving the charge is discharged less quickly).
LEE fails to disclose the battery system is a redox flow battery system; with each battery module having a cell arrangement with a plurality of redox flow cells and a tank device for storing electrolyte and for supplying the cell arrangement with electrolyte.
UNDERWOOD discloses the battery system is a redox flow battery system (pg. 6, ll. 17-18: a flow battery 1 consists of a series of four Vanadium Redox stacks 21 .. 24, normally electrically connected in series); with each battery module having a cell arrangement with a plurality of redox flow cells (21, 22, 23, 24, Fig. 2) and a tank device (3, Fig. 2) for storing electrolyte and for supplying the cell arrangement with electrolyte (pg. 6, ll. 19-21: The stacks are paired with electrolyte tanks 3. By paired is intended that each tank supplies in parallel two stacks via pipework 4, with electrolyte pumps 5).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the redox flow battery system in order to utilize the known characteristics of redox flow battery systems, such as improved safety, durability, and/or flexibility.
LEE fails to disclose a bidirectional power conversion system, and the battery modules are connected to the bidirectional power conversion system.
UNDERWOOD further discloses a bidirectional power conversion system (6, Figure 2), and the battery modules are connected to the bidirectional power conversion system (pg. 6, ll. 28-29: The battery is connected to an inverter/charger 6 to receive charge from a source of electricity 8 and supply it to a load 9).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the bidirectional conversion system in order to provide controlled power input to and output from the battery system, therefore facilitating connection of the battery system to a power source and a load.
LEE fails to disclose during a charging of the battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce a difference between a first battery module and a second battery module, in terms of a controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result.
GARNIER discloses during a charging of the battery system (¶ 0132: This balancing both between stages 11 of a module 13 and between modules 13 can be implemented at the same time as the charging of the battery 1), actuating the DC-DC converters (7, Fig. 3) by the controller (14, Fig. 3) in order to reduce a difference between a first battery module and a second battery module (¶ 0097, 0112, 0116: charge balancing), in terms of a controlled variable thereof (¶ 0131: balancing voltage levels in the case of the charging of a power battery 1, in such a manner as to bring all the stages 11 to a nominal voltage level), to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result (¶ 0111: a single converter 7 that is bidirectional in current may be provided which allows, on the one hand, the modules 13 with the most charge to be discharged by using the charge balancing energy in order to supply power to the low-voltage system, and on the other hand, the stages 11 of the modules 13 to be charged up from the low-voltage supply system; ¶ 0141: take the energy from the module 13 with the most charge and to transfer it to the most discharged module 13).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the controlling the DC-DC converters during charging as recited in order to improve the speed of the balancing by allowing individual modules to discharge during the balancing process.
Regarding claim 17, LEE discloses the DC-DC converters are of bidirectional or unidirectional design (¶ 0048, 0056-0057).
Regarding claim 18, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches during the charging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result; and during the discharging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC- DC converter to dissipate an amount of electrical energy from the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is discharged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result (GARNIER, ¶ 0111-0112, 0131, 0141).
Regarding claim 21, LEE discloses the redox flow battery system comprises at least one measuring device for providing a controlled variable for each battery module (¶ 0018), and wherein the controller is connected to the at least one measuring device for acquiring measurement values of the at least one measuring device (¶ 0018), and wherein the method further comprises:
acquiring the measurement values of the at least one measuring device by the controller (¶ 0018-0019);
if at least one measurement value of a first battery module differs from a measurement value of a second battery module at a first point in time (¶ 0025-0026):
carrying out at least one of the following steps in order to reduce a difference between the measurement values of the first battery module and the second battery module at a second point in time later, and thereby carrying out the step in a period between the first point in time and the second point in time (¶ 0053), the steps being:
a) during the charging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce a difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of a controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result; and
b) during a discharging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of a controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to dissipate an amount of electrical energy from the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is discharged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result (¶ 0026, 0053, 0078);
c) during the charging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result; and
d) during the discharging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to dissipate an amount of electrical energy from the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is discharged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result.
Regarding claim 23, LEE discloses a battery system (¶ 0010: charge equalization apparatus which performs charge equalization in a series-connected battery string), comprising:
at least two battery modules (1141, 1142, Fig. 1),
wherein the at least two battery modules are connected in series (¶ 0047: a battery string 1140 is divided into M battery modules 1141 to 1146 having K battery cells connected in series);
a DC-DC converter for each battery module (1121, 1122, Fig. 1), said DC-DC converter having a first terminal connected to a respective battery module (¶ 0048: Each of M battery modules 1141 to 1146 dividing the battery string 1140 into each module is connected to …. DC-DC converters 1121 to 1126 composing a second stage DC-DC converter 1120. Therefore, M battery modules are equipped with …. M DC-DC converters) and a second terminal connected to a common DC bus (¶ 0048: All inputs of the second stage DC-DC converter 1120 are connected to an output of the first stage DC-DC converter 1110 in parallel as shown in FIG. 1; the common bus is the connection between the stage DC-DC converter 1120 and the first stage DC-DC converter 1110);
a further power conversion system (1110, Fig. 1) connected to the common DC bus (as shown in Fig. 1); and
a controller (2200, Fig. 2) connected to said further power conversion system and to said DC-DC converters, said controller being configured to control said further power conversion system and said DC-DC converters (¶ 0057: The charge equalization is carried out on the low-charged battery cell by allowing the microprocessor 2200 to measure the voltage of the individual battery under the control of the multiplexer 2110, determine low-charged battery cell based on the voltage of the individual battery and control the switch module 1130, the main switch of each DC-DC converter 1121 to 1126 for each module in the second stage and the main switch of the first stage DC-DC converter 1110),
wherein the battery system is further configured to automatically reduce imbalances that occur during charging and discharging of the battery system (¶ 0053: the two-stage charge equalization apparatus according to the present invention performs charge equalization by controlling charge in the battery cell in order to overcome the voltage difference between batteries which can be caused when charging or discharging the batteries),.
LEE fails to disclose the battery system is a redox flow battery system, wherein each battery module of the at least two battery modules includes a cell arrangement having a plurality of redox flow cells and a tank device for storing electrolyte and for supplying the cell arrangement with electrolyte.
UNDERWOOD discloses the battery system is a redox flow battery system (pg. 6, ll. 17-18: a flow battery 1 consists of a series of four Vanadium Redox stacks 21 .. 24, normally electrically connected in series), with each battery module of the at least two battery modules includes a cell arrangement having a plurality of redox flow cells (21, 22, 23, 24, Fig. 2) and a tank device (3, Fig. 2) for storing electrolyte and for supplying the cell arrangement with electrolyte (pg. 6, ll. 19-21: The stacks are paired with electrolyte tanks 3. By paired is intended that each tank supplies in parallel two stacks via pipework 4, with electrolyte pumps 5).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the redox flow battery system in order to utilize the known characteristics of redox flow battery systems, such as improved safety, durability, and/or flexibility.
LEE fails to disclose a bidirectional power conversion system, wherein the at least two battery modules are connected to the bidirectional power conversion system.
UNDERWOOD further discloses a bidirectional power conversion system (6, Figure 2), wherein the at least two battery modules are connected to the bidirectional power conversion system (pg. 6, ll. 28-29: The battery is connected to an inverter/charger 6 to receive charge from a source of electricity 8 and supply it to a load 9).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the bidirectional conversion system in order to provide controlled power input to and output from the battery system, therefore facilitating connection of the battery system to a power source and a load.
LEE fails to disclose the battery system is further configured to automatically reduce imbalances that occur during charging and discharging of the battery system by, during the charging of the battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce a difference between a first battery module and a second battery module of the at least two battery modules, in terms of a controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result.
GARNIER discloses the battery system is further configured to automatically reduce imbalances that occur during charging and discharging of the battery system (¶ 0132, 0153) by, during the charging of the battery system (¶ 0132: This balancing both between stages 11 of a module 13 and between modules 13 can be implemented at the same time as the charging of the battery 1), actuating the DC-DC converters (7, Fig. 3) by the controller (14, Fig. 3) in order to reduce a difference between a first battery module and a second battery module of the at least two battery modules (¶ 0097, 0112, 0116: charge balancing), in terms of a controlled variable thereof (¶ 0131: balancing voltage levels in the case of the charging of a power battery 1, in such a manner as to bring all the stages 11 to a nominal voltage level), to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is charged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result (¶ 0111: a single converter 7 that is bidirectional in current may be provided which allows, on the one hand, the modules 13 with the most charge to be discharged by using the charge balancing energy in order to supply power to the low-voltage system, and on the other hand, the stages 11 of the modules 13 to be charged up from the low-voltage supply system; ¶ 0141: take the energy from the module 13 with the most charge and to transfer it to the most discharged module 13).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the controlling the DC-DC converters during charging as recited in order to improve the speed of the balancing by allowing individual modules to charge/discharge during the balancing process.
Regarding claim 24, LEE discloses said DC-DC converters are of bidirectional or unidirectional design (¶ 0048, 0056-0057).
Regarding claim 28, LEE discloses automatically reducing imbalances that occur during charging and discharging of the redox flow battery system (¶ 0053) by performing at least one of the following steps:
during the charging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to transmit an amount of electrical energy on the common DC bus that one of the first and second two battery modules is charged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result;
during a discharging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to dissipate an amount of electrical energy from the common DC bus that one of the fist and second battery modules is discharged less quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result (¶ 0026, 0053, 0078);
during the discharging of the redox flow battery system, actuating the DC-DC converters by the controller in order to reduce the difference between the first battery module and the second battery module, in terms of the controlled variable thereof, to cause one DC-DC converter to dissipate an amount of electrical energy from the common DC bus that one of the first and second battery modules is discharged more quickly than the other of the first and second battery modules as a result.
Regarding claim 29, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches a computer program comprising computer code in non-transitory form configured to command a redox flow battery system to execute the method according to claim 16 (LEE, ¶ 0011, 0015-0022: computer code is implied in order to implement the disclosed microprocessor operations).
Regarding claim 30, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches a computer-readable medium storing a computer program for executing the method according to claim 16 when computer-executable code of the computer program is executed by the controller (LEE, ¶ 0011, 0015-0022: medium with computer program is implied in order to implement the disclosed microprocessor operations).
Claim(s) 19 and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEE in view of UNDERWOOD and GARNIER as applied to claims 16-18, 21, 23-24, and 28-30 above, and further in view of COLBORN (US PG Pub 2004/0053093; cited in previous office action).
Regarding claim 19, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches the method as applied to claim 16 but fails to disclose each battery module of the at least two battery modules comprises auxiliary systems to be supplied with current from outside of the respective battery module by way of terminals, and the method comprises connecting the terminals of the auxiliary systems to the common DC bus and feeding the auxiliary systems with energy via the common DC bus.
COLBORN discloses each battery module of the at least two battery modules comprises auxiliary systems to be supplied with current from outside of the respective battery module by way of terminals, and the method comprises connecting the terminals of the auxiliary systems to the common DC bus and feeding the auxiliary systems with energy via the common DC bus (¶ 0027: power is optionally drawn from the DC bus via auxiliary bus 41 to power the fuel cell controller. This power may also be used to power auxiliary equipment inside the fuel cell such as pumps and air blowers, which may be controlled and/or powered by the fuel cell controller).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the auxiliary systems supplied with current from outside the respective battery module as recited in order to ensure proper operation of the battery module.
Regarding claim 25, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches the redox flow battery system as applied to claim 23 but fails to disclose each battery module of the at least two battery modules comprises auxiliary systems to be supplied with current from outside of the respective battery module by way of terminals, wherein the terminals of the auxiliary systems are connected to the common DC bus and are fed with energy from the common DC bus.
COLBORN discloses each battery module of the at least two battery modules comprises auxiliary systems to be supplied with current from outside of the respective battery module by way of terminals, wherein the terminals of the auxiliary systems are connected to the common DC bus and are fed with energy from the common DC bus (¶ 0027: power is optionally drawn from the DC bus via auxiliary bus 41 to power the fuel cell controller. This power may also be used to power auxiliary equipment inside the fuel cell such as pumps and air blowers, which may be controlled and/or powered by the fuel cell controller).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the auxiliary systems supplied with current from outside the respective battery module as recited in order to ensure proper operation of the battery module.
Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEE in view of UNDERWOOD and GARNIER as applied to claims 16-18, 21, 23-24, and 28-30 above, and further in view of BEASTON (US PG Pub 2016/0111900; cited in previous office action).
Regarding claim 20, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches the method as applied to claim 16 but fails to disclose in a calibration step, determining characteristics of individual battery modules of the at least two battery modules in order to stipulate different charging and discharging speeds for the individual battery modules and lengths of time for which the different charging and discharging speeds are used.
BEASTON discloses in a calibration step, determining characteristics of individual battery modules of the at least two battery modules in order to stipulate different charging and discharging speeds for the individual battery modules and lengths of time for which the different charging and discharging speeds are used (¶ 0207-0209).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the calibration step in order to ensure proper balancing operation (BEASTON, ¶ 0208).
Claim(s) 22 and 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEE in view of UNDERWOOD and GARNIER as applied to claims 16-18, 21, 23-24, and 28-30 above, and further in view of YOSHIDA (US PG Pub 2015/0035495; cited in previous office action).
Regarding claim 22, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches the method as applied to claim 16 but fails to disclose the battery system comprises, for each battery module, a first switch and a second switch, the first switch being arranged in series in a series circuit with an associated battery module and the second switch being arranged in a bypass line for bypassing the associated battery module and a respectively associated first switch, and the controller being connected to each of the first switches and the second switches so that the controller determines respective switch positions in order to connect the at least two battery modules into the series circuit or to bypass the series circuit, and wherein the method further comprises: controlling with the controller a number of battery modules in the series circuit in order to reduce a difference between the first battery module and the second battery module in terms of the controlled variable, wherein one of the first and second battery modules is in the series circuit for a shorter period of time than the other of the first and second battery modules over a period during the charging or discharging of the redox flow battery system.
YOSHIDA discloses the redox flow battery system comprises, for each battery module (100, Fig. 12), a first switch (206, Fig. 12) and a second switch (208, Fig. 12), the first switch being arranged in series in a series circuit with an associated battery module and the second switch being arranged in a bypass line for bypassing the associated battery module and a respectively associated first switch (¶ 0172, 0174), and the controller being connected to each of the first switches and the second switches so that the controller determines respective switch positions in order to connect the at least two battery modules into the series circuit or to bypass the series circuit (¶ 0172, 0174), and wherein the method further comprises: controlling with the controller a number of battery modules in the series circuit in order to reduce a difference between the first battery module and the second battery module in terms of the controlled variable (¶ 0175), wherein one of the first and second battery modules is in the series circuit for a shorter period of time than the other of the first and second battery modules over a period during the charging or discharging of the redox flow battery system (¶ 0207).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the first switch and the second switch as recited in order to provide an efficient alternative means to reduce imbalances between the modules.
Regarding claim 26, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD and GARNIER teaches the redox flow battery system as applied to claim 23 but fails to disclose a first switch and a second switch for each battery module of the at least two battery modules, the first switch being arranged in each case in series in a series circuit with an associated battery module of the at least two battery modules and the second switch being arranged in each case in a bypass line around the associated battery module and an associated first switch, and wherein the controller is connected to each of the first switches and the second switches, and the controller is configured to determine a respective switch position in order to connect the at least two battery modules into the series circuit or out of the series circuit.
YOSHIDA discloses a first switch (206, Fig. 12) and a second switch (208, Fig. 12) for each battery module (100, Fig. 12) of the at least two battery modules, the first switch being arranged in each case in series in a series circuit with an associated battery module of the at least two battery modules and the second switch being arranged in each case in a bypass line around the associated battery module and an associated first switch (¶ 0172, 0174), and wherein the controller is connected to each of the first switches and the second switches, and the controller is configured to determine a respective switch position in order to connect the at least two battery modules into the series circuit or out of the series circuit (¶ 0172, 0174-0175).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to include the first switch and the second switch as recited in order to provide an efficient alternative means to reduce imbalances between the modules.
Claim(s) 27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over LEE in view of UNDERWOOD, GARNIER, and YOSHIDA as applied to claim 26 above, and further in view of SMITH (US 5,883,495; cited in previous office action).
Regarding claim 27, LEE as modified by UNDERWOOD, GARNIER, and YOSHIDA teaches the redox flow battery system as applied to claim 26, but fails to disclose said first switch comprises two normally off MOSFETs with channels that are connected in series and with reverse diodes always blocking in both current directions, and wherein said second switch comprises one normally off MOSFET.
SMITH discloses said first switch comprises two normally off MOSFETs with channels that are connected in series and with reverse diodes always blocking in both current directions (152, 154, Fig. 2; col 6, ll. 56 – col 7, ll. 23). Furthermore, MOSFETS are an old and known expedient in the art, and providing the second switch of YOSHIDA as a MOSFET would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have modified the first and second switch of YOSHIDA by utilizing MOSFETs in order to utilize the known characteristics of MOSFETs, such fast switching speeds, low power dissipation, and simpler drive circuitry.
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANUEL HERNANDEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9a-5p ET.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at (571) 272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/Manuel Hernandez/Examiner, Art Unit 2859 11/24/2025
/DREW A DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Prosecution Insights