Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/914,475

Method of Manufacturing Electrode Including Folding Portion and Electrode Sheet Including Folding Portion

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 26, 2022
Priority
Jun 08, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0069118 +1 more
Examiner
MURATA, AUSTIN
Art Unit
1700
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
453 granted / 744 resolved
-4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
784
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
61.0%
+21.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 744 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed 7/18/2025 is entered and fully considered. In view of the amendment the prior art is reconsidered and a new rejection is made using the same art. The examiner interview 7/11/2025 indicated that lines DGJ are the “folding portion”. However, on review of the art and previous rejections the KIM reference does not appear to have any “folding” portion. LIM teaches including slots (uncoated portions) within an electrode area to allow for flexibility (folding). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KIM et al. (US 2012/0321946) in view of LIM et al. (US 9,502,734). Regarding claim 1, KIM teaches coating a plurality of coated portions with an electrode mixture onto a current collector as shown in Fig. 4A. The uncoated portions include a first uncoated portion along the edge of the electrode sheet in addition to uncoated portions between coated areas along the processing direction X, see Fig. 4A. The reference then teaches slitting along lines A, B and C [0070] shown in fig. 5A (slitting into a unit electrode sheets). Thereafter, additional slit lines are made (notching) along lines D through F [0072]. The additional slits D and F correspond to a notching step where a coated portion is cut, most importantly a coated portion along line F, I and L which clean the electrode edge. KIM teaches uncoated portions between coated areas (a second uncoated portion) but cuts the tabs/leads into the uncoated areas and does not teach the second uncoated portion to include a folding portion. However, LIM teaches that when making an electrode active area the formation of slots (uncoated portions) allows for flexibility of the electrode column 7 lines 31-57. The slots can run across the width of the electrode area as shown in Fig. 10. At the time of filing the invention it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include uncoated slots in the electrode area of KIM (e.g. between D/E and E/F in Fig. 6) to improve flexibility of the electrode. When incorporating the uncoated slots of LIM into the electrode area of KIM, there are multiple uncoated slots spanning the width of the electrode area. When slits are made along lines F, I, and L, the slits are made in a coating area. The adjacent uncoated areas include the space between electrode areas (F-G and I-J) which is a first part of the second uncoated portion. LIM teaches the second part of the second uncoated area I which the electrode space (E-F) also has uncoated slots across the width of the electrode area. When slitting along line F, the edge of the electrode is trimmed by cutting through a non-uniform coated portion (114 of Fig. 6). This coated portion has an adjacent uncoated slot area incorporated by LIM and an adjacent uncoated area for cutting out tabs 113a. Regarding claim 2, KIM teaches slitting along a central coated portion between uncoated edges. Each edge corresponds to a first and a second part of the first uncoated portion. Regarding claim 16, LIM teaches forming slots in the electrode area. The slot is formed between coated portions of the electrode area (a first and second coated portion) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 8, 9 and 17 are allowed. Claims 6 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 4, the combination of KIM and LIM results in a notching (slitting along line F) with an electrode area including slots (folding portions) for flexibility. However, the slots as described in LIM include more than one slot which means that there are several slots (folding portions) between slitting (notching) E and F. Therefore, the folding portions and notching portions are not alternately disposed between coating portions because some/most coating portions have slots (folding portions) on both sides. Claims 5, 8, 9 and 17 depend from claim 4. Regarding claim 6, the combination of KIM and LIM above results in the electrode tab being formed in the second uncoated portion. The references do not teach forming the tab in the first uncoated portion. Claim 7 depends from claim 6. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AUSTIN MURATA whose telephone number is (571)270-5596. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL CLEVELAND can be reached at 571272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AUSTIN MURATA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 09, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 18, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735845
Soil Paving Material and Soil Paving Method
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12708961
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MAKING ADHESIVE TAPE
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703782
WEAR RESISTANT COATING, METHOD OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF AND ARTICLES COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706295
ELECTRODE FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERY, MANUFACTURING APPARATUS THEREOF AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695081
POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 744 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month