Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/914,926

NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE FOR BATTERY, PRECURSOR FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY, PHOSPHAZENE COMPOUND, AND ADDITIVE FOR BATTERY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 27, 2022
Examiner
AMPONSAH, OSEI K
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 680 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
748
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 680 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Upon consideration, the previous rejection of record was withdrawn in light of new amendments. However new rejection is applied to the amended claims. All changes made in the rejection are necessitated by the amendment. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-8 and 16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-8 and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP 2006-036709 A hereinafter Inoue [cited in IDS filed 09-27-2022] in view of U.S. Pre-Grant Publication No. 2013/0089793 hereinafter Gering. Regarding Claims 1-4, Inoue teaches an electrolyte for a lithium battery (paragraph 75), the electrolyte comprising an ionic liquid represented by formula (I) (paragraphs 10-12, see formula (I) shown below). PNG media_image1.png 194 346 media_image1.png Greyscale Inoue further teaches that in the general formula (1), Zn- is an anion and any anion can be used as long as it can form an ion pair with the phosphazenium cation (i.e., compounds having an active hydrogen atom on an oxygen atom, nitrogen atom, or sulfur atom, mineral acids, and superacids) (paragraph 30). Inoue does not specifically disclose the anion as claimed and that electrolyte further comprising a non-aqueous solvent different from the ionic liquid. However, Gering teaches an electrolyte solution for a lithium battery, the electrolyte solution comprising a non-aqueous solvent and a phosphazene ionic liquid (paragraphs 72-74). Gering further teaches that the phosphazene ionic liquid includes an anion such as bis(oxalate)borate (BOB-) and perchlorate (ClO4-) (paragraph 68). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use such anion in the ionic liquid before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Gering discloses that such configuration can provide the phosphazene ionic liquid with sufficient electrochemical stability for use in the energy storage device (paragraph 68). The combination teaches that the phosphazene ionic liquid may be used as an additive in the electrolyte solution and may be included in amount of 1 wt % to 10 wt % (paragraph 72 of Gering). The use of a known technique to improve similar products (methods) in the same way is likely to be obvious. See KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S._,_, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395 - 97 (2007) (see MPEP § 2143, C.). Regarding Claim 5, the combination teaches that the phosphazene ionic liquid includes an anion such as bis(oxalate)borate (BOB-) and perchlorate (ClO4-) (paragraph 68 of Gering). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use such anion in the ionic liquid before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Gering discloses that such configuration can provide the phosphazene ionic liquid with sufficient electrochemical stability for use in the energy storage device (paragraph 68). Regarding Claims 6-8, the combination teaches that the electrolyte solution comprises a non-aqueous solvent and a phosphazene ionic liquid (paragraphs 72-74 of Gering), wherein the non-aqueous solvent includes ester (paragraph 74), and wherein the ratio of the ionic liquid to the solvent is 1:1 (paragraph 74). In addition, the selection of a known material (i.e., vinylene carbonate as the cyclic ester), which is based upon its suitability for the intended use, is within the ambit of one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960) (see MPEP § 2144.07). Regarding Claim 16, Inoue teaches an electrolyte for a lithium battery (paragraph 75), the electrolyte comprising an ionic liquid represented by formula (I) (paragraphs 10-12, see formula (I) shown below). PNG media_image1.png 194 346 media_image1.png Greyscale Inoue further teaches that in the general formula (1), Zn- is an anion and any anion can be used as long as it can form an ion pair with the phosphazenium cation (i.e., compounds having an active hydrogen atom on an oxygen atom, nitrogen atom, or sulfur atom, mineral acids, and superacids) (paragraph 30). Inoue does not specifically disclose the anion as claimed and that electrolyte further comprising a non-aqueous solvent different from the ionic liquid. However, Gering teaches an electrolyte solution for a lithium battery, the electrolyte solution comprising a non-aqueous solvent and a phosphazene ionic liquid (paragraphs 72-74). Gering further teaches that the phosphazene ionic liquid includes an anion such as bis(oxalate)borate (BOB-) and perchlorate (ClO4-) (paragraph 68). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use such anion in the ionic liquid before the effective filing date of the claimed invention because Gering discloses that such configuration can provide the phosphazene ionic liquid with sufficient electrochemical stability for use in the energy storage device (paragraph 68). The combination teaches that the phosphazene ionic liquid may be used as an additive in the electrolyte solution and may be included in amount of 1 wt % to 10 wt % (paragraph 72 of Gering). The use of a known technique to improve similar products (methods) in the same way is likely to be obvious. See KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S._,_, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395 - 97 (2007) (see MPEP § 2143, C.). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OSEI K AMPONSAH whose telephone number is (571)270-3446. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NICHOLAS A SMITH can be reached at (571)272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OSEI K AMPONSAH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586819
Non-Aqueous Electrolyte and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580223
STABILIZED SOLID GARNET ELECTROLYTE AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573615
All-Solid-State Battery and Method of Manufacturing the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573717
MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES, SEPARATORS, LITHIUM BATTERIES, AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567648
EXPLOSIVE ENVIRONMENT NEUTRALIZATION IN CHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 680 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month