DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Priority
Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR10-2020-0045324, filed on 4/14/2020.
Claim Status
Claims 1,12,17 and 18 have been amended.
Claims 16,19 and 20 has been cancelled.
Claims 1-15,17 and 18 are pending and examined as follows:
Claim Interpretation
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f):
(f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked.
As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph:
(A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function;
(B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and
(C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function.
Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function.
Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function.
Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action.
This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: fixing member in claim 11 and control unit in claim 12.
Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. The specification defines the fixing member is a bar (paragraph 0129). The specification defines the control unit as an ecu (paragraph 0091).
If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1,2,3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyu et al (KR20110062803A) in view of Kadota et al (JP2797497B2).
With regards to claim 1, Kyu et al discloses a vehicle heating device (car air conditioner, Title) comprising:
a heating unit having one side connected to an air-conditioning casing and the other side disposed toward an occupant in an occupant compartment (heater housing 160 connected to duct 140 and another end towards outlets 141, Fig. 3), the heating unit being configured to radiate heat (heater housing 160 has PTC elements 155a which generates heat, Fig. 8),
wherein the heating unit heats an interior of the occupant compartment through at least any one of heat convection and heat radiation (air flows over the PTC elements 155a to provide convection heat and heat radiation, Fig. 8),
wherein the heat convection is formed in the occupant compartment by heating air supplied from the air-conditioning casing and passing through the heating unit (air is supplied by blower 120 is supplied to duct 140 pass through PTC elements 155a, Fig. 2), and
wherein the heat radiation heats the occupant by radiating heat directly toward the occupant (heat radiated from PTC elements 155a is dissipated through outlet 141, Fig. 2).
Kyu et al does not disclose a housing having one side connected to a floor duct of the air-conditioning casing, and the other side provided with an opening wherein the housing comprises a duct part connected to the floor duct and configured to communicate with the floor duct, and a guide disposed at the opening and positioned at afront end of the heating unit based on a flow direction of air, and wherein a plurality of holes formed in the guide direct air moving through the duct part to ventilation holes of the heating unit.
Kadota et al teaches a housing having one side connected to a floor duct of the air-conditioning casing (auxiliary heating device having a first heating device 13 and second heating device 14 connected to floor heater duct 11,Fig. 1 and 2), and the other side provided with an opening (other side of the first heating device 13 and second heating device 14 each have outlet 28, Fig. 1), wherein the housing comprises a duct part connected to the floor duct and configured to communicate with the floor duct, (air from duct 11 is sucked through inlet 27 of the first ventilation duct 22 of each of the first heating device 13 and second heating device 14, Fig. 1 and 2) and a guide disposed at the opening and positioned at afront end of the heating unit based on a flow direction of air ,and wherein a plurality of holes formed in the guide direct air moving through the duct part to ventilation holes of the heating unit (opening 28 has holes that move air, Fig. 1).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al and Kadota et al before him or her, to modify the heating device of Kyu et al to include the housing and connection to a floor duct as taught by Kadota et al because the combination allows for reliable heating of a floor in a vehicle.
With regards to claim 2, Kyu et al discloses wherein the heating unit comprises:
a frame (heater housing 160, Fig. 4); and
a planar upper heating element and a planar lower heating element disposed on the frame (heat generating units 155 inside heater housing 160, Fig. 8) and spaced apart from each other to define a heat exchange region (heat generating units 155 are spaced apart by dissipation fins 156, Fig. 7), and
wherein heat radiated from the upper heating element and heat radiated from the lower heating element exchange heat with air passing through the heating unit in the heat exchange region (air passes through each of the heat generating units 155 attached to dissipation fins 156, Fig. 7).
With regards to claim 3, Kyu et al discloses wherein the heat exchange region is provided in plural, and wherein the plurality of heat exchange regions comprises:
a first heat exchange region formed at a front end of the upper heating element based on a flow direction of air (heat radiation fins 156 on a first of the heat generating unit 155, Fig. 7); and
a second heat exchange region formed between the upper heating element and the lower heating element (spaced region between the heat radiation fins 156 of each of the heat generating units 155, Fig. 7).
With regards to claim 5, Kyu et al discloses wherein air passing through ventilation holes of the upper heating element exchanges heat with radiant heat from the upper heating element (air passes through the space between heating fins 156 of each of the heat generating units 155, Fig. 7) and the lower heating element while being mixed with the radiant heat in the second heat exchange region before passing through ventilation holes of the lower heating element (air passes through the heating fins 156 of the first heat generating unit 155 and through the heating fins 156 of the second heat generating unit 155, Fig. 7).
Claim(s) 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kadota et al as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Gwi et al (KR20090042415A).
With regards to claim 4, Kyu et al and Kadota et al does not teach wherein the second heat exchange region is formed in the frame of the heating unit, and the upper heating element and the lower heating element are disposed outside the frame.
Gwi et al teaches a heating apparatus for a vehicle having wherein the second heat exchange region is formed in the frame of the heating unit, and the upper heating element and the lower heating element are disposed outside the frame (a filter part 25 having a pretreatment filter 25a and fine filter 25b which provides a base for heating means 20, and each heat generating means 20 having heating element 21 disposed outside of the filter 25, Fig. 5).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Gwi et al before him or her, to modify the heat generating parts of Kyu et al and Kadota et al to include the filter part and heating part of Gwi et al because the combination allows for improved heat exchange efficiency between the air and a heating element thereby saving energy.
Claim(s) 6-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyu et al and Kadota et al as applied to claim 2, in further view of Hetzler et al (US2010/0012641).
With regards to claim 6, Kyu et al and Kadota et al teaches wherein the upper heating element and the lower heating element each comprise: a planar body having a plurality of ventilation holes (each heat generating unit 155 has a planar shape and has dissipating fins 156 having plates spaced apart to create a hole to provide ventilation of air, Fig. 7); heat generating parts disposed on the body (each heat generating unit 155 having PTC elements 155a, Fig. 5).
Kyu et al and Kadota et al does not teach a first and second electrodes disposed on the body and configured to apply power to the heat generating parts.
Hetzler et al teaches a vehicle heating system having a first and second electrodes disposed on the body and configured to apply power to the heat generating parts (electric connectors 9a,9b are attached to contact rails 3 for providing power to heating devices 10, Fig. 2,3).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Hetzler et al before him or her, to modify the heat generating parts of Kyu et al and Kadota et al to include the contact rails of Hetzler et al because the combination allows for a compact power solution for a vehicle heating apparatus.
With regards to claim 7, Kyu et al discloses wherein the heat generating parts of the lower heating element are disposed to overlap the ventilation holes of the upper heating element based on a flow direction of air (each of heat generating units 155 having heat radiation fins 156 which have spacings which overlap with each other in an air flow direction, Fig. 6).
With regards to claim 8, Kyu et al discloses wherein the ventilation hole of the lower heating element is disposed to overlap the ventilation hole of the upper heating element based on a flow direction of air (each of heat generating units 155 having heat radiation fins 156 which have spacings which overlap with each other in an air flow direction, Fig. 6).
With regards to claim 9, Kyu et al discloses wherein the heat generating parts are disposed adjacent to the ventilation holes (heat generating unit 155 is adjacent to heat radiation fins 156 which have spacings, Fig. 6).
With regards to claim 10, Kyu et al discloses wherein the body of the upper heating element comprises: a first surface disposed to face the lower heating element (PTC heater 152 has a first surface facing PTC heater 151, Fig. 7); and
a second surface opposite to the first surface (PTC heater 152 has a second surface opposite the surface of PTC heater facing PTC heater 151, Fig. 7), and
wherein the heat generating parts of the upper heating element are disposed on the second surface and face air supplied toward the heating unit (portion of PTC 152 contacts heat radiation fins 156 and carries heated air towards duct 140, Fig. 8).
With regards to claim 11, Kyu et al discloses wherein the heating unit comprises:
a frame (heater housing 160, Fig. 4); and
a planar element disposed on the frame and configured to generate heat (heat generating units 155 inside heater housing 160, Fig. 8);
a fixing member coupled to the frame and configured to fix the heating element to the frame (heater housing 160 has bars and fitting on top and bottom to hold heat generating units 155, Fig. 5 and Fig. 7),
wherein the heating element comprises:
a planar body having a plurality of ventilation holes (each heat generating unit 155 has a planar shape and has dissipating fins 156 having plates spaced apart to create a hole to provide ventilation of air, Fig. 7);
heat generating parts mounted on the body (each heat generating unit 155 having PTC elements 155a, Fig. 5)
wherein the body is bent to define an upper heating element and a lower heating element disposed to be spaced apart from each other (heat generating units 155 are crimped at the top to be spaced apart by dissipation fins 156, Fig. 5).
Kyu et al and Kadota et al does not teach a first and second electrodes disposed on the body and configured to apply power to the heat generating parts.
Hetzler et al teaches a vehicle heating system having a first and second electrodes disposed on the body and configured to apply power to the heat generating parts (electric connectors 9a,9b are attached to contact rails 3 for providing power to heating devices 10, Fig. 2,3).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Hetzler et al before him or her, to modify the heat generating parts of Kyu et al and Kadota et al to include the contact rails of Hetzler et al because the combination allows for a compact power solution for a vehicle heating apparatus.
With regards to claim 12, Hetzler et al teaches a vehicle heating system wherein the first electrodes comprise: an upper first electrode electrically connected to the upper heating element (one of a plurality of contact rail 3 connected to electric connectors 9a and 9b for powering one of the heating devices 10, Fig. 1); and a lower first electrode electrically connected to the lower heating element (one of another of the plurality of contact rail 3 connected to electric connectors 9a and 9b for powering one of another of the heating devices 10, Fig. 1), and wherein the control unit selectively applies power to the upper first electrode and the lower first electrode (contact rails can be alternately connected to the positive and negative pole, respectively, of a voltage source and this alternation in flow direction results in a simple and clear circuit arrangement, paragraph 0014, lines 3-4).
With regards to claim 13, Hetzler et al teaches a vehicle heating system wherein the heating element comprises: two active regions in which the heat generating parts are disposed (heating devices 10 are disposed inside heat transfer devices 2a,2b,2c, Fig. 2); and an inactive region disposed between the two active regions (contact rails 3 do not have heating device 10 and therefore are considered to be inactive, Fig. 2), and wherein the inactive region is disposed to face one surface of the frame (contact rail 3 has a surface that holder 4, Fig. 1).
Claim(s) 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyu et al and Kadota et al as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Hetzler et al and further in view of Oide et al (DE112016001738).
With regards to claim 14, Kyu et al discloses a frame (heater housing 160, Fig. 4);
a planar heating element disposed on the frame and configured to generate heat (heat generating units 155 inside heater housing 160, Fig. 8);
wherein the heating element comprises:
a planar body having a plurality of ventilation holes (each heat generating unit 155 has a planar shape and has dissipating fins 156 having plates spaced apart to create a hole to provide ventilation of air, Fig. 7);
heat generating parts mounted on the body (each heat generating unit 155 having PTC elements 155a, Fig. 5)
wherein the body is bent to define an upper heating element and a lower heating element disposed to be spaced apart from each other (heat generating units 155 are crimped at the top to be spaced apart by dissipation fins 156, Fig. 5).
Kyu et al and Kadota et al does not teach a first and second electrodes disposed on the body and configured to apply power to the heat generating parts.
Hetzler et al teaches a vehicle heating system having a first and second electrodes disposed on the body and configured to apply power to the heat generating parts (electric connectors 9a,9b are attached to contact rails 3 for providing power to heating devices 10, Fig. 2,3).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Hetzler et al before him or her, to modify the heat generating parts of Kyu et al and Kadota et al to include the contact rails of Hetzler et al because the combination allows for a compact power solution for a vehicle heating apparatus.
Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Hetzler et al does not teach a detector disposed to be in contact with the heating element and wherein the application of power to the heat generating part is cut off when a line disposed on the detector is deformed.
Oide et al teaches a planar electric heater having a detector disposed to be in contact with the heating element and wherein the application of power to the heat generating part is cut off when a line disposed on the detector is deformed (the heater-ECU 50 includes an abnormality sensing section that detects an abnormality of the heat generation section 21 the heater unit 20 sensing a conductive line break, and the heater-ECU 50 drives a process of abnormality determination of the heater main body 10 based on whether the abnormality of the heat generation section 21 is sampled with this abnormality sampling section, paragraph 0087, lines 1-3).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al, Kadota et al ,Hetzler et al and Oide et al before him or her, to modify the heat generating parts of Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Hetzler et al to include the abnormality sensing portion of Oide et al because the combination allows for increased safety for a heating apparatus.
Claim(s) 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyu et al and Kadota et al as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Oide et al.
With regards to claim 15, Kyu et al and Kadota t al teaches a housing having one side connected to a floor duct of the air-conditioning casing and the other side having an opening (separate heater housing 160 is connected to duct 140 and outlets 141, Fig. 4).
Kyu et al and Kadota et al does not teach wherein the heating unit is disposed in the opening, and the housing is rotatably disposed at an end of the floor duct.
Oide et al teaches heater unit having a heating unit is disposed in the opening, and the housing is rotatably disposed at an end of the floor duct (heater main body 10 disposed in an opening of glove box 82 and the heater main body 10 is rotated by a moving mechanism 40 at the end of glove box 82, Fig. 1,2).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et al, Kadota et al and Oide et al before him or her, to modify the duct parts of Kyu et al and Kadota et al to include the moving mechanism of Oide et al because the combination allows heating to an occupant while they are in various positions.
With regards to claim 18, Kyu et al and Kadota et al does not teach wherein the housing further comprises a heating part disposed on one surface of an inner part of the duct part and the heating part heat air flowing along an interior of the duct part.
Oide et al teaches a vehicle heating system with housing that further comprises a heating part disposed on one surface of an inner part of the duct part and the heating part heat air flowing along an interior of the duct part (glovebox duct 82 has a carrying element 44 has a surface that holds a heater main body 10 to heat air coming through to an occupant 81, Fig. 1).
Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Kyu et a, Kadota et al l and Oide et al before him or her, to modify the outlet of Kyu et al and Kadota et al to include the heating part of Oide et al because the combination allows more heat capacity to an occupant for a much more pleasant ride.
Allowable Subject Matter
The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 17 is allowable because the prior art does not disclose or teach wherein the plurality of holes comprises first and second holes having different sizes, wherein the second hole is disposed to be closer to the air-conditioning casing than is the first hole, and wherein the guide protrusion guides air discharged through the first hole.
Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.”
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 10/22/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive.
Applicants arguments: Applicant argues the prior art does not disclose or teach the amended limitations of claim 1.
Examiners response: Applicant amended claim 1 to include “a housing having one side connected to a floor duct of the air-conditioning casing, and the other side provided with an opening wherein the housing comprises a duct part connected to the floor duct and configured to communicate with the floor duct, and a guide disposed at the opening and positioned at afront end of the heating unit based on a flow direction of air, and wherein a plurality of holes formed in the guide direct air moving through the duct part to ventilation holes of the heating unit”. Kadota et al teaches a housing having one side connected to a floor duct of the air-conditioning casing (auxiliary heating device having a first heating device 13 and second heating device 14 connected to floor heater duct 11,Fig. 1 and 2), and the other side provided with an opening (other side of the first heating device 13 and second heating device 14 each have outlet 28, Fig. 1), wherein the housing comprises a duct part connected to the floor duct and configured to communicate with the floor duct, (air from duct 11 is sucked through inlet 27 of the first ventilation duct 22 of each of the first heating device 13 and second heating device 14, Fig. 1 and 2) and a guide disposed at the opening and positioned at afront end of the heating unit based on a flow direction of air ,and wherein a plurality of holes formed in the guide direct air moving through the duct part to ventilation holes of the heating unit (opening 28 has holes that move air, Fig. 1).
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THOMAS JOHN WARD whose telephone number is (571)270-1786. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 7am - 4pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, STEVEN CRABB can be reached at 5712705095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/THOMAS J WARD/Examiner, Art Unit 3761
/EDWARD F LANDRUM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3761