Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/915,939

WIRELESS CHARGING APPARATUS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE HAVING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 29, 2022
Examiner
OMAR, AHMED H
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Skc Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
798 granted / 1062 resolved
+7.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1062 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims Status Claims 1-3 and 5-9 are currently pending, Claims 1, 3, 8 and 9 are currently amended, Claims 3 and10 are currently cancelled. Response to Amendment/Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks, filed 07/30/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-2 and 6-7, under 35 U.S.C. 102 and Claims 3-5 and 8-10 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of ZENG et al. (US 221/0184476 A1) as modified by TERANISHI et al. (US 2022/0293487 A1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-7 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ZENG et al. (US 2021/0184476 A1, hereinafter ZENG) in view of TERANISHI et al. (US 2022/0293487 A1, hereinafter TERANISHI). PNG media_image1.png 540 896 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, ZENG discloses a wireless charging apparatus (See Figs.1 and 5, Items#1 and 1’ and Par.24 disclose a wireless charging apparatus) comprising: a heat radiation module (See Figs.2 and 5, Item#10 and Par.25, discloses a casing comprising a top plate 101, a bottom plate 102 and plural lateral walls 103) a circuit board disposed in the heat radiation module (See Fig.5, Item#11 and Par.26, disclose a transmitter driving board); and a power module which is disposed in the heat radiation module and includes a coil for wireless charging (See Figs.2 and 5, Item#12 and Par.28, disclose a transmitter coil assembly), wherein the heat radiation module comprises: a case body in which the circuit board and the power module are housed (See Figs.2 and 5, disclose the case body 101+103+102 disclose a case housing the circuit board 11 and the power module 12); and a partition part formed inside the case body (See Fig.5, and Par.34, disclose a partition plate) wherein the partition part comprises: a partition plate connected to an inner surface of the case body (See Fig.5, Item#104). However, ZENG does not disclose a separation space between the circuit board and the power module, at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the circuit board or the power module, wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes. PNG media_image2.png 354 542 media_image2.png Greyscale TERANISHI an electronic device including a cooling system, the cooling system comprising a partition plate, at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to a power module forming a separation space between the circuit board and the power module (See Fig.6 and Par.25, disclose heat generating electronic components 9 (B). The fins 3,4 extend from the top surface of the lower housing 2 [See annotated Fig.6 and Fig.1] to the power module 9(B). Also see spaces between fins 3 and 4. Applicant’s specification defines the separation to be the space between dissipation fins [See PGPUB of the current application, Pars.99-100]), wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes (See annotated Fig.6, Item#10 and 36, disclose a thermal conductive material between the fins 3,4 and elements 9(E)/9(H) on the other side of the annotated partition plate). ZENG and TERANISHI are analogous art since they both deal with cooling structure for electronic devices. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by ZENG with the teachings of TERANISHI by adding one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the power module for the benefit of dissipating heat from the heat generating components in the power module (See TERANISHI, Par.25) and it would have also been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by ZENG with the teachings of TERANISHI by adding a heat transfer member on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrude for the benefit of dissipating heat from the other heat generating module on the other side of the partition plate. Regarding claim 2, ZENG and TERANISHI disclose the wireless charging apparatus according to claim 1 as discussed above, wherein the heat radiation module comprises a first space in which the circuit board is disposed (See ZENG, Fig.5, and Par.39, disclose a second compartment 14b for housing the transmitting driving board 11) and a second space in which the power module is disposed (See ZENG, Fig.5 and Par.39, disclose a first compartment for housing transmitting coil assembly 12), wherein the partition part is configured to partition the first and second spaces (See ZENG, Fig.5 and Par.39, disclose the partition plate 104 divides the interior space into 2 compartments). Regarding claim 3, ZENG and TERANISHI disclose the wireless charging apparatus according to claim 1 as discussed above, wherein the separation space is formed in a direction in which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes (See TERANISHI, Fig.6 discloses spaces between the fins 3,4). Regarding claim 5, ZENG and TERANISHI disclose the wireless charging apparatus according to claim 1 as discussed above, However, ZENG and TERANISHI as applied to claim 1 as discussed above, wherein the case body of the heat radiation module and the partition part are integrally formed with each other (See ZENG, Fig.2, discloses separation plate is integrated into casing comprising lateral walls 103). Regarding claim 6, ZENG and TERANISHI disclose the wireless charging apparatus according to claim 1 as discussed above, wherein the heat radiation module comprises external heat radiation fins extending outwardly from the case body and formed in a radial direction (See ZENG, Fig.5, Items#105 and Par.35, disclose side fins connected to the partition plate 104). Regarding claim 7, ZENG and TERANISHI disclose the wireless charging apparatus according to claim 6 as discussed above, However, ZENG and TERANISHI do not disclose wherein the external heat radiation fins comprise a plurality of mounting heat radiation fins having different protrusion heights from the case body so as to have a shape corresponding to the shape of an installation surface which is mounted on the heat radiation module. However, the examiner explains that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by ZENG and TERANISHI by adjusting the height of the radiating fins to correspond to the shape of the installation space for the benefit of fitting the wireless charging apparatus in the installation space. Regarding claim 9, ZENG discloses a wireless charging apparatus (See Figs.1 and 5, Items#1 and 1’ and Par.24 disclose a wireless charging apparatus) comprising: a heat radiation module (See Figs.2 and 5, Item#10 and Par.25, discloses a casing comprising a top plate 101, a bottom plate 102 and plural lateral walls 103) a circuit board disposed in the heat radiation module (See Fig.5, Item#11 and Par.26, disclose a transmitter driving board); and a power module which is disposed in the heat radiation module and includes a coil for wireless charging (See Figs.2 and 5, Item#12 and Par.28, disclose a transmitter coil assembly), wherein the heat radiation module comprises: a case body in which the circuit board and the power module are housed (See Figs.2 and 5, disclose the case body 101+103+102 disclose a case housing the circuit board 11 and the power module 12); and a partition part formed inside the case body (See Fig.5, and Par.34, disclose a partition plate) wherein the partition part comprises: a partition plate connected to an inner surface of the case body (See Fig.5, Item#104). However, ZENG does not disclose a separation space between the circuit board and the power module, at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the circuit board or the power module, wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes, wherein a heating rate (HR, °C/min) expressed by Equation below is greater than 0 and less than 2.0: Heating Rate (HR)= Δ Heating temperature (°C)/60 min (In the above equation, the 60 min is a time for which the wireless charging apparatus is charged, and the A heating temperature means a temperature change when the wireless charging apparatus is charged for 60 minutes). TERANISHI an electronic device including a cooling system, the cooling system comprising a partition plate, at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to a power module forming a separation space between the circuit board and the power module (See Fig.6 and Par.25, disclose heat generating electronic components 9 (B). The fins 3,4 extend from the top surface of the lower housing 2 [See annotated Fig.6 and Fig.1] to the power module 9(B). Also see spaces between fins 3 and 4. Applicant’s specification defines the separation to be the space between dissipation fins [See PGPUB of the current application, Pars.99-100]), wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes (See annotated Fig.6, Item#10 and 36, disclose a thermal conductive material between the fins 3,4 and elements 9(E)/9(H) on the other side of the annotated partition plate). ZENG and TERANISHI are analogous art since they both deal with cooling structure for electronic devices. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by ZENG with the teachings of TERANISHI by adding one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the power module for the benefit of dissipating heat from the heat generating components in the power module (See TERANISHI, Par.25) and it would have also been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by ZENG with the teachings of TERANISHI by adding a heat transfer member on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrude for the benefit of dissipating heat from the other heat generating module on the other side of the partition plate. However, ZENG and TERANISHI do not disclose explicitly disclose wherein a heating rate (HR, °C/min) expressed by Equation below is greater than 0 and less than 2.0: Heating Rate (HR)= Δ Heating temperature (°C)/60 min (In the above equation, the 60 min is a time for which the wireless charging apparatus is charged, and the A heating temperature means a temperature change when the wireless charging apparatus is charged for 60 minutes). The examiner however explains that designing a heat radiation module to achieve a certain heat rate is an obvious design choice and that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to try different materials for the heat radiation module to not exceed the desired heat rate. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JANG et al. (KR20160065242 A, hereinafter JANG, cited in previous office action) in view of ZENG and in further view of TERANISHI et al. (US 2022/0293487 A1, hereinafter TERANISHI). Regarding claim 8, JANG discloses an electric vehicle configured to move using electricity as a power source (See Fig.1, Item#20, discloses an electric scooter comprising a battery), comprising: a battery configured to be charged through the wireless charging apparatus (See Par.46, discloses the battery is charged via circuit 21). However, JANG does not disclose the wireless charging apparatus comprising: a heat radiation module; a circuit board disposed in the heat radiation module; and a power module which is disposed in the heat radiation module and includes a coil for wireless charging, wherein the heat radiation module comprises: a case body in which the circuit board and the power module are housed; and a partition part formed inside the case body to form a separation space between the circuit board and the power module, wherein the partition part comprises: a partition plate connected to an inner surface of the case body; and at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the circuit board or the power module, wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes. ZENG discloses a wireless charging apparatus (See Figs.1 and 5, Items#1 and 1’ and Par.24 disclose a wireless charging apparatus) comprising: a heat radiation module (See Figs.2 and 5, Item#10 and Par.25, discloses a casing comprising a top plate 101, a bottom plate 102 and plural lateral walls 103) a circuit board disposed in the heat radiation module (See Fig.5, Item#11 and Par.26, disclose a transmitter driving board); and a power module which is disposed in the heat radiation module and includes a coil for wireless charging (See Figs.2 and 5, Item#12 and Par.28, disclose a transmitter coil assembly), wherein the heat radiation module comprises: a case body in which the circuit board and the power module are housed (See Figs.2 and 5, disclose the case body 101+103+102 disclose a case housing the circuit board 11 and the power module 12); and a partition part formed inside the case body (See Fig.5, and Par.34, disclose a partition plate) wherein the partition part comprises: a partition plate connected to an inner surface of the case body (See Fig.5, Item#104). JANG and ZENG are analogous art since they both deal with wireless charging. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by JANG with the teachings of ZENG by using the wireless charger structure disclosed by ZENG for the benefit of protecting the wireless charger elements by dissipating excess heat. However, JANG and ZENG do not disclose a separation space between the circuit board and the power module, at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the circuit board or the power module, wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes. TERANISHI an electronic device including a cooling system, the cooling system comprising a partition plate, at least one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to a power module forming a separation space between the circuit board and the power module (See Fig.6 and Par.25, disclose heat generating electronic components 9 (B). The fins 3,4 extend from the top surface of the lower housing 2 [See annotated Fig.6 and Fig.1] to the power module 9(B). Also see spaces between fins 3 and 4. Applicant’s specification defines the separation to be the space between dissipation fins [See PGPUB of the current application, Pars.99-100]), wherein a heat transfer member is disposed on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrudes (See annotated Fig.6, Item#10 and 36, disclose a thermal conductive material between the fins 3,4 and elements 9(E)/9(H) on the other side of the annotated partition plate). JANG, ZENG and TERANISHI are analogous art since they all deal with electronic structures. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by JANG and ZENG with the teachings of TERANISHI by adding one heat radiation fin protruding from the partition plate to the power module for the benefit of dissipating heat from the heat generating components in the power module (See TERANISHI, Par.25) and it would have also been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention disclosed by ZENG with the teachings of TERANISHI by adding a heat transfer member on a surface of the partition plate opposite to the surface from which the at least one heat radiation fin protrude for the benefit of dissipating heat from the other heat generating module on the other side of the partition plate. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED H OMAR whose telephone number is (571)270-7165. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 am -7:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Drew Dunn can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED H OMAR/ Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 30, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603522
CARAVANNING AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TRAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603515
ACCESSORY CASE FOR MULTIPLE CHARGER TYPES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592585
WIRELESS CHARGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576734
Automotive Battery Power System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580407
METHODS FOR CONTROLLING POWER DISTRIBUTION TO VEHICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1062 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month