Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/916,274

ADJUSTING INSTRUMENT FOR AN EXTERIOR VISION UNIT OF A MOTOR VEHICLE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 30, 2022
Examiner
ALLEN, STEPHONE B
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mci (Mirror Controls International) Netherlands B V
OA Round
2 (Final)
13%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
32%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 13% of cases
13%
Career Allow Rate
11 granted / 82 resolved
-54.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
7 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 82 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Applicant's arguments filed 07/28/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive in view of applicant’s change in the scope of the claims. 3. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 4. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The specification as originally filed fails to provide an accurate written description for the wire spring being capable of supported on the adjusting element as recited in claim 1, lines 11-14. The specification as originally filed fails to provide an accurate written description for the engagement body being integrally formed with the adjusting element as recited in claim 12, lines 2 and 3. The specification as originally filed fails to provide an accurate written description for the engagement body being movably relative to the fixing element as recited in claim 13, lines 2 and 3. Claims 2-18 similarly fail to provide an accurate written description due to their dependency 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 6. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 13, lines 2-3, the use of the language “the engagement body is movably relative to the fixing element is vague and indefinite. It is unclear to the examiner how the engagement body is capable of being movable relative to the fixing element when the engagement body is an integral part of the fixing body. Thus, the metes and bounds of the claim is unclear. 7. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICKY D SHAFER whose telephone number is (571)272-2320. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 11:00-7:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone B. Allen can be reached at (571) 272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RDS November 01, 2025 /RICKY D SHAFER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 25, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 26, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 28, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 29, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 30, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 30, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12222492
MICROELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICE HAVING A STRUCTURE TILTABLE BY PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATION ABOUT TWO ROTATION AXES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 11, 2025
Patent 12221338
ACTUATOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ACTUATOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 11, 2025
Patent 12216269
Deformable Mirror with Magnetically Receptive Ferrous Backing
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 04, 2025
Patent 12197036
LOW PROFILE HOLLOW RETROREFLECTOR ASSEMBLY AND THEIR MOUNTING STRUCTURES AND MOUNTING METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 14, 2025
Patent 12187199
ELECTRIC RETRACTION UNIT, ELECTRICALLY RETRACTABLE PERIPHERAL VISIBILITY DEVICE FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
13%
Grant Probability
32%
With Interview (+18.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 82 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month