DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 12/31/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. For claim 1, Applicant state that R1 does not disclose “wherein the PDCCH comprises a paging PDCCH, and the determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result comprises: if the paging PDCCH is monitored, obtaining first paging indication information in the paging PDCCH: and determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first paging indication information”; however, R1 discloses this limitation in paragraphs 134-142, 162-175, 182-208, as previously cited, a PDCCH is received and reviewed, the information in said PDCCH triggers a determination of whether the reference signal is valid and measured (i.e. CSI-RS). Therefore, since R1 discloses the claimed limitations, the rejections under the prior art are maintained and updated based on the amendments to the claims accordingly.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status.
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1,3,7-9, 18, and 39-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Onggosanusi Eko et al (US 2019/0305837)[R1].
For claim 1, R1 discloses detecting a downlink signal or monitoring a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) to obtain a first result, wherein the first result is a detection result or a monitoring result (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208); and determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208 determine valid based on the previously receiving paging PDCCH) wherein a PDCCH comprises a paging PDCCH, and the determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result comprises: if the paging PDCCH is monitored, obtaining first paging indication information in the paging PDCCH; and determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first paging indication information (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
For claim 3, R1 discloses wherein the determining that the reference signal is valid, wherein the reference signal is after the paging PDCCH, comprises: determining that the reference signal in a first preset time is valid, wherein the first preset time is after the paging PDCCH (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
For claim 7, R1 discloses the determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first paging indication information comprises: if the first paging indication information indicates that a UE subgroup needs to receive a paging message or to be woken up, determining that the reference signal is valid, wherein a target UE belongs to the UE subgroup and the reference signal is after obtaining the first paging indication information (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208 additionally contingent limitation in method claim).
For claim 8, R1 discloses the determining that the reference signal is valid, wherein the reference signal is after obtaining the first paging indication information comprises: determining that the reference signal in a third preset time is valid, wherein the third preset time is after obtaining the first paging indication information (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
For claim 9, R1 discloses the first paging indication information is carried in a reserved bit of the paging PDCCH (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
For claim 18, R1 discloses wherein the reference signal is a channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
For claim 39, R1 discloses at least one a processor (paragraphs 6-12); and a memory connected with the at least one processor in a communication way; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, the instructions being executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of (paragraphs 6-12): detect a downlink signal or monitoring a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) to obtain a first result, wherein the first result is a detection result or a monitoring result (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208); and determine whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208) wherein the PDCCH comprises a paging PDCCH, and the determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result comprises: if the paging PDCCH is monitored, obtaining first paging indication information in the paging PDCCH; and determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first paging indication information (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
For claim 40, R1 discloses non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions, wherein the computer instructions are used to cause a computer to perform the method (paragraphs 6-12): detecting a downlink signal or monitoring a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) to obtain a first result, wherein the first result is a detection result or a monitoring result (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208); and determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208) wherein the PDCCH comprises a paging PDCCH, and the determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first result comprises: if the paging PDCCH is monitored, obtaining first paging indication information in the paging PDCCH; and determining whether the reference signal is valid according to the first paging indication information (paragraphs 6-8, 118, 134-142, 162-175, 182-208).
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER R CROMPTON whose telephone number is (571)270-3678. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-4PM ET M-Th.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad Nawaz can be reached at (571)272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/CHRISTOPHER R CROMPTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463