Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/917,053

METHOD FOR ADJUSTING THE GRIND SIZE OF A GRINDER, AND GRIND SIZE ADJUSTMENT ASSEMBLY OF A GRINDER

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Oct 05, 2022
Examiner
LINDSAY, BERNARD G
Art Unit
2119
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Melitta Professional Coffee Solutions GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
310 granted / 451 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+47.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
488
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 451 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 3, and 6-7 are pending. Claims 2 and 4-5 are cancelled and claims 6-7 are new. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgement is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) to German Patent Application No. 10220109528.7, filed on 4/6/2020. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/16/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 10/16/25, have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments regarding the prior rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) (pages 5-6) are persuasive and this rejection is withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments regarding the alleged deficiencies in the prior rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Rose, Subbiah and Liu and the combination of Rose and Cheng (pages 6-10) are moot in view of the newly cited reference, Mazzer. Neither Subbiah nor Cheng is currently cited. It is also noted that the advantages cited by Applicant (pages 9-10) are not actually claimed. Applicant’s argument is therefore not persuasive. For at least these reasons, the rejection of the claims is maintained. Claim Objections The claims are objected to because of the following informalities: ‘each sensor device transmit the current setting value’ should read ‘each sensor device transmitting the current setting value’ (claim 3). ‘each sensor device transmit the current setting value’ should read ‘each sensor device transmitting the current setting value’ (claim 6). There are two periods after claim 7. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation ' a coffee machine having a plurality of grinders configured for grinding coffee beans, each grinder comprising:… a control unit configured to adjust the grind size adjustment device’. Figure 8 of the instant specification shows coffee machine K2 with grinders 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3 but coffee machines K2 and K3 only have a single control unit 8 for the plurality of grinders, not a control unit for each grinder. This constitutes limitation therefore constitutes new matter because it is not described in the application as originally filed. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 6, and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. With regard to claim 1, this claim recites the limitation ‘locally separate’ and it is unclear what the metes and bounds are of ‘locally’ separate; see MPEP 2173.05. With regard to claim 3, this claim recites ‘the units’ for which there is no antecedent basis. With regard to claim 6, this claim recites ‘a coffee machine… comprising: a grind size adjustment device… a sensor device…, and a control unit…, and a remote control unit’ and is unclear because the claim may potentially be interpreted to include the remote control unit in the coffee machine. The respective dependent claims are also rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 as they inherit all of the characteristics of the claim from which they depend and none of the dependent claims provide a cure for the indefiniteness of the parent claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 and 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rose et al. U.S. Patent Publication No. 20180055288 (hereinafter Rose) in view of Mazzer European Patent Application No. 3542682, published 9/25/2019 (hereinafter Mazzer) and previously provided by Applicant and further in view of the English translation of Liu Taiwanese Patent Publication No. 201633976, published 10/1/2016 (hereinafter Liu). Regarding claim 1, Rose teaches a method for adjusting the grind size of a grinder for grinding coffee beans [0006 — the sensing apparatus can include one or more sensors configured to detect one or more compounds released by the beans to evaluate, for example, flavor characteristics, aromatic characteristics, bean freshness, roast characteristics, and/or other coffee bean/ground information. For example, a sensor can detect (VOCs) released by the coffee beans, grounds, foodstuff, or other items. A processor can analyze signals from the sensor to monitor changes in the beans to determine grind settings for producing grounds; 0012 — a computer implemented method… a computing device can automatically provide information to a user by transmitting the information via a network. The computing device can be part of a coffee grinder capable of sending information to the user's computer, smart phone, tablet, wearable device (e.g., smart watch) or another computing device. In some embodiments, the computing device can include a computer, controller, or another device capable of receiving and analyzing signals from sensors; 0042-0043 — The cones can have features that cooperate to smash, crush, and/or grind coffee beans… fineness adjustment wheel 102 can be rotated to select a course grind, a medium grind, or a fine grind… In automated embodiments, the grinder 100 may include a device that moves the adjustment wheel 102. The device can include, without limitation, a motor, a servo, an actuator, or another device suitable for controllably moving the adjustment wheel 102], wherein a grind size adjustment of the grinder is carried out by means of a remote control unit arranged locally separate from the at least one grinder via a transmission link, the grind size adjustment of the grinder is performed by means of a telemetric remote access by the remote control unit [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting; 0154 — Remote viewing devices (e.g., device 521 in FIG. 8) can communicate directly with the grinder 80 via Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, ZigBee, Bluetooth, peer-to-peer protocols, or other methods or technology. A network connection such as provided by an Ethernet local area network (LAN) interface, or, a wireless network interface via a WiFi LAN access point provided, for example], wherein the grinder has a grind size adjustment device, control unit and a sensor device [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043-0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders... This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting] and wherein the method comprises: determining with the sensor device of the grinder a current setting value of the grind size adjustment device [0044, Fig. 8 — grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like… detector 206 can then communicate the setting to a controller,], transmitting the current setting value from the sensor device to the control unit of the grinder [0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ connected to microprocessors (controllers) is shown in the figure], transmitting the current setting value from the control unit of the grinder to the remote control unit [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and sending data for setting the grind size adjustment device via the transmission link from the remote control unit to the control unit of the grinder [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting] and adjusting the grind size of the grinder with the control unit based on the data sent by the remote control unit, to achieve a grind size in the grinder [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders... This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting]. Rose fails to clearly specify that the determining/transmitting the grind setting and sending data for setting the grind size adjustment steps are performed in the claimed order. However, at the time the invention was made, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to perform the steps in the claimed order because ‘any order of performing process steps is prima facie obvious in the absence of new or unexpected results’ and no unexpected result would occur by changing the order of determining a setting and setting a setting; see MPEP 2144.04 IV. Rose further fails to clearly specify a plurality of grinders and performing a method for adjusting a grind size to achieve a uniform grind size in each grinder. However, Mazzer teaches a plurality of grinders and performing a method for adjusting a grind size in each grinder [0040-0041, Figs. 1-2 — According to a possible embodiment (figure 2), the delivery system 4 comprises a plurality of dispensing units 12, each monitoring its own infusion parameter. In addition, each dispensing unit 12 will be operatively connected to at least one grinding device 20 so as to adjust the corresponding grinding unit 24 in order to obtain a certain degree of fineness of the ground powder for the same weight of ground powder. Therefore, the present invention also applies to systems comprising a plurality of supply units 12 and a plurality of grinding devices 20, which may dialogue with each other through one or more control units 36, so as to manage, even simultaneously, the adjustment of the degree of fineness of the ground powder by any grinding unit 24, as requested at the moment by any dispensing unit 12 — a plurality of grinding devices 20 is shown, one of which comprises a plurality of grinding units 24]. Rose and Mazzer are analogous art. They relate to coffee grinding devices. Therefore before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to simply substitute the known plurality of connected grinders, as taught by Mazzer, for the known single grinder, as taught by Rose, for the predictable result of a method for adjusting a grind size of each of a plurality of grinders. The combination of Rose and Mazzer fails to clearly specify adjusting a grind size to achieve a uniform grind size in each grinder. However, Liu teaches adjusting a setting to achieve a uniform setting in each grinder location [page 4, 5th paragraph — the central processor 25 sets the beverage according to the setting. Operating the program information, the brewing device 34 is controlled to perform a beverage brewing procedure. It is not only easy to input, but also has the same setting of beverage brewing procedures in each chain store, franchise store or branch store, which can avoid the wrong setting that may occur in each operation, and the beverages of each store can obtain consistent quality.; page 4, 7th paragraph — the order is for coffee; page 5, 5th paragraph — the customer selects the coffee beverage… the coffee bean is ground into a powder,.. The operator activates the grinder 60 to complete the grinding process via an operating device 63 according to the beverage order information displayed by the display device 62 of the grinder 60]. Rose, Mazzer and Liu are analogous art. They relate to coffee grinding devices. Therefore before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to adjust a grind size to achieve a uniform grind size in each grinder in order to avoid an incorrect grinder setting and provide consistent quality, as suggested by Liu [page 4, 5th paragraph]. Regarding claim 7, the combination of Rose, Mazzer and Liu teaches all the limitations of the base claims as outlined above. Further, Mazzer teaches the grinders are disposed in one or more coffee machines, and wherein at least one of the one or more coffee machines has multiple grinders [0040-0041, Figs. 1-2 — According to a possible embodiment (figure 2), the delivery system 4 comprises a plurality of dispensing units 12, each monitoring its own infusion parameter. In addition, each dispensing unit 12 will be operatively connected to at least one grinding device 20 so as to adjust the corresponding grinding unit 24 in order to obtain a certain degree of fineness of the ground powder for the same weight of ground powder. Therefore, the present invention also applies to systems comprising a plurality of supply units 12 and a plurality of grinding devices 20, which may dialogue with each other through one or more control units 36, so as to manage, even simultaneously, the adjustment of the degree of fineness of the ground powder by any grinding unit 24, as requested at the moment by any dispensing unit 12 — a plurality of grinding devices 20 is shown, one of which comprises multiple grinding units 24]. Therefore before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to simply substitute the known coffee machine with multiple grinders, as taught by Mazzer, for the known single grinder, as taught by Rose, for the predictable result of a method for adjusting a grind size of each of a coffee machine with multiple grinders. Claim(s) 3 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rose in view of Mazzer. Regarding claim 3, Rose teaches a grind size adjustment assembly comprising: a coffee machine, the coffee machine having a grinder configured for grinding coffee beans [0042-0047, Figs. 1-3 — FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the grinder 100… The cones can have features that cooperate to smash, crush, and/or grind coffee beans… fineness adjustment wheel 102 can be rotated to select a course grind, a medium grind, or a fine grind… grinding element 201], the grinder comprising: a grind size adjustment device configured to adjust a grind size of the grinder [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043 — fineness adjustment wheel 102 can be rotated to select a course grind, a medium grind, or a fine grind… In automated embodiments, the grinder 100 may include a device that moves the adjustment wheel 102. The device can include, without limitation, a motor, a servo, an actuator, or another device suitable for controllably moving the adjustment wheel 102], a sensor device configured to determine a current setting value of the grind size adjustment device [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043-0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders... This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and a control unit configured to adjust the grind size adjustment device [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043-0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders... This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and a remote control unit which is in communication connection via a transmission link with a control unit of the grinder [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting; 0154 — Remote viewing devices (e.g., device 521 in FIG. 8) can communicate directly with the grinder 80 via Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, ZigBee, Bluetooth, peer-to-peer protocols, or other methods or technology. A network connection such as provided by an Ethernet local area network (LAN) interface, or, a wireless network interface via a WiFi LAN access point provided, for example] wherein the sensor device is configured to transmit the current setting value to the control unit of the grinder, which in turn is designed to transmit the current setting value also to the remote control unit [0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and wherein the remote control unit is designed to transmit data for setting the grind size adjustment device of the coffee machine via the transmission link to the control unit of the grinder [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting]. But Rose fails to clearly specify a plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder and operating similarly to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders. However, Mazzer teaches a plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder and operating similarly to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders [0040-0041, Figs. 1-2 — According to a possible embodiment (figure 2), the delivery system 4 comprises a plurality of dispensing units 12, each monitoring its own infusion parameter. In addition, each dispensing unit 12 will be operatively connected to at least one grinding device 20 so as to adjust the corresponding grinding unit 24 in order to obtain a certain degree of fineness of the ground powder for the same weight of ground powder. Therefore, the present invention also applies to systems comprising a plurality of supply units 12 and a plurality of grinding devices 20, which may dialogue with each other through one or more control units 36, so as to manage, even simultaneously, the adjustment of the degree of fineness of the ground powder by any grinding unit 24, as requested at the moment by any dispensing unit 12 — a plurality of grinding devices 20 is shown, one of which comprises a plurality of grinding units 24]. Rose and Mazzer are analogous art. They relate to coffee grinding devices. Therefore before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to simply substitute the known plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder and configured to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders, as taught by Mazzer, for the known single grinder, as taught by Rose, for the predictable result of grind size adjustment assembly comprising; a plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder that is configured to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders. Regarding claim 6, Rose teaches a grind size adjustment assembly comprising: a coffee machine having a grinder configured for grinding coffee beans, the grinder comprising: a grind size adjustment device configured to adjust a grind size of the grinder [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043 — fineness adjustment wheel 102 can be rotated to select a course grind, a medium grind, or a fine grind… In automated embodiments, the grinder 100 may include a device that moves the adjustment wheel 102. The device can include, without limitation, a motor, a servo, an actuator, or another device suitable for controllably moving the adjustment wheel 102], a sensor device configured to determine a current setting value of the grind size adjustment device [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043-0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders... This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and a control unit configured to adjust the grind size adjustment device [0037-0038 — The grind adjustment element 102 can be used to adjust grinding settings; 0043-0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders... This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and a remote control unit which is in communication connection via a transmission link with the control unit of the grinder [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting; 0154 — Remote viewing devices (e.g., device 521 in FIG. 8) can communicate directly with the grinder 80 via Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, ZigBee, Bluetooth, peer-to-peer protocols, or other methods or technology. A network connection such as provided by an Ethernet local area network (LAN) interface, or, a wireless network interface via a WiFi LAN access point provided, for example], the sensor device transmit the current setting value to the control unit of the associated grinder, which in turn is designed to transmit the current setting value to the remote control unit [0044 — A grind fineness setting detector 206 (“detector 206”) can monitor the grind setting and can be a digital encoder, an optical encoder, a variable potentiometer, an electromechanical detector, or the like.; 0152-0154, Fig. 8 — the sensing base 101 can include a controller 406 configured to command the grinder 100. The controller 406 can include a processor 513 and memory 515 and can be in communication with sensors 402, 401, 404. Additional sensors can be utilized — a ‘Grind Size Sensor’ and microprocessors (controllers) are shown in the figure; 0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting], and wherein the remote control unit is designed to transmit data for setting the grind size adjustment device of the grinder via the transmission link to the control unit of the grinder [0066-0090, Fig. 8 — an environment in which a grinding system may operate. Data can be collected from sensors of grinders and/or sensing bases to provide information about coffee beans, guidance on usage to maximize the quality of the coffee experience, or the like. This can be accomplished through the use of a remotely running computer program, remote server, and database, referred to as the cloud service 501. The user can interact with the cloud service 501 through a client application 502 via a remote device 521 (illustrated as a smartphone). The remote device 521 can also be a computer, tablet, smart watch, virtual assistant device, or the like… client application 502 allows the user to perform functions in communication with the cloud service that, in turn, communicates with the sensing base 101. These functions may include: Getting the current values from each of the sensors in the sensing base and grinder… Reading the value of the grind fineness setting, and in some embodiments, setting the value of the grind fineness setting]. But Rose fails to clearly specify a plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder and operating similarly to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders. However, Mazzer teaches a plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder and operating similarly to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders [0040-0041, Figs. 1-2 — According to a possible embodiment (figure 2), the delivery system 4 comprises a plurality of dispensing units 12, each monitoring its own infusion parameter. In addition, each dispensing unit 12 will be operatively connected to at least one grinding device 20 so as to adjust the corresponding grinding unit 24 in order to obtain a certain degree of fineness of the ground powder for the same weight of ground powder. Therefore, the present invention also applies to systems comprising a plurality of supply units 12 and a plurality of grinding devices 20, which may dialogue with each other through one or more control units 36, so as to manage, even simultaneously, the adjustment of the degree of fineness of the ground powder by any grinding unit 24, as requested at the moment by any dispensing unit 12 — a plurality of grinding devices 20 is shown, one of which comprises a plurality of grinding units 24]. Rose and Mazzer are analogous art. They relate to coffee grinding devices. Therefore before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to simply substitute the known plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder and configured to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders, as taught by Mazzer, for the known single grinder, as taught by Rose, for the predictable result of grind size adjustment assembly comprising; a plurality of coffee machines, each coffee machine having a grinder that is configured to set the grind size adjustment device of each one of the coffee machines/grinders. Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Buchholz et al. U.S. Patent Publication No. 20180035839 that discloses a method for operating an automatic beverage dispenser. Note that any citations to specific, pages, columns, lines, or figures in the prior art references and any interpretation of the reference should not be considered to be limiting in any way. A reference is relevant for all it contains and may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art. See MPEP 2123. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BERNARD G. LINDSAY whose telephone number is (571)270-0665. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mohammad Ali can be reached on (571)272-4105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant may call the examiner or use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /BERNARD G LINDSAY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2119
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
May 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Oct 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603501
Device And Method For Controlling The Voltage Of Microgrids
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12547163
ANOMALY DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD USING INVARIANTS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12506360
REDUNDANT GENERIC OBJECT ORIENTED SUBSTATION EVENT (GOOSE) MESSAGES WITH LIVE AND TEST POWER SYSTEM DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12487567
CHILLER AND AIR HANDLER CONTROL USING CUSTOMIZABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12474699
System and Method for Anomaly Detection using an Attention Model
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+47.0%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 451 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month