Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/917,149

METHOD, EQUATION, DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCT TO PROVIDE UNIFORM HEATING FOR SHAPED HEATERS WITH IMPROVED BUSBAR DESIGNS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 05, 2022
Priority
Apr 06, 2020 — provisional 63/005,745 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, VY T
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
VISION DFIND INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 379 resolved
+2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
80.1%
+40.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 379 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group II and species 9 (Fig. 9C) which is drawn to claims 9-12 is acknowledged. Claims 1-8 and 13-20 are canceled. Election was made in the reply filed on 05/04/2026. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) was submitted on 05/19/2026 and 10/06/2022. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 9-10 and 12 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 18-19 of US patent 11039505 B1 (hereby “Parker”). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claimed subject matter of the present applicant and that of the claims of the US patent 11039505 B1 are substantially the same and the claimed subject matter of the present application would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art based on the claimed subject matter of the claims of the US patent 11039505 B1. Regarding independent claim 9, Parker discloses, a transparent or mirrored heated material of non-uniform width that minimizes the presence of hot spots across a surface of the material (see claim 18 “A system for providing heating across a transparent or mirrored surface of non-uniform width”) comprising: a substrate layer defining the shape of the surface (see claim 18 “a base substrate defining a shape of the surface”); a conductive film layered over the substrate layer (see claim 18 “a thin conductive material applied to the base substrate”); and two busbars (see claim 18 “busbars applied to the thin conductive material”) where a first busbar is positioned at a top outer edge of the surface (see claim 18 “a first busbar of the busbars is applied to or next to a first edge of the surface”) and the second busbar is positioned at a bottom outer edge of the surface (see claim 18 “a second busbar of the busbars is applied to or next to a second edge of the surface opposite the first edge”), wherein sheet resistivity of the conductive film varies as a function of a distance defined by a linear path between the two busbars, wherein the sheet resistivity increases as the distance defined by a linear path between the two busbars decreases in order to improve uniform heating across the surface (see claim 18 “where L.sub.1 is a first linear path across the surfaces between busbars, L.sub.1 being the longest vertical path between busbars when busbars are located along a top edge and a bottom edge of the surface, L.sub.2 is any second linear path across the surface between busbars, L.sub.2 being shorter than and parallel to L.sub.1, and W is the width of a busbar contact region, and wherein contact between the conductive film and the busbars is continuous except where a dielectric coating underneath the busbars prevents electrical contact between the busbars and the conductive film”) . Regarding claim 10, Parker discloses, the material as defined in claim 9, wherein the sheet resistivity is increased by providing voids or holes in the conductive film, and wherein at least one of the number and density of the voids and holes increases as the distance defined by a linear path between the two busbars decreases (see claim 18 “at least one of holes, voids, and dots applied to the thin conductive material to alter resistivity across a surface defined by the thin conductive material, wherein more of the at least one of holes, voids, and dots are present when the busbars are closer together than when the busbars are farther apart”). Regarding claim 12, Parker discloses, the heated goggles comprising a lens (see claim 19 “heated lens”) composed of the material as defined in of claim 9 (see claim 9 cited above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 9, and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated over Park (US 5806102 A). Regarding independent claim 9, Park discloses, a transparent or mirrored heated material of non-uniform width that minimizes the presence of hot spots across a surface of the material (see Figs. 4-5) comprising: a substrate layer (see weather lens 100 in Figs. 4-5) defining the shape of the surface (see Fig. 5); a conductive film (see electroconductive 110 in Fig. 4) layered over the substrate layer (see Fig. 4); and two busbars (see upper and lower electrodes 120 and 130 in Figs. 4-5), where a first busbar (upper electrode 120) is positioned at a top outer edge of the surface (see Figs. 4-5) and the second busbar (lower electrode 130) is positioned at a bottom outer edge of the surface (see Figs. 4-5), wherein sheet resistivity of the conductive film (110) varies as a function of a distance defined by a linear path between the two busbars (see Fig. 5), wherein the sheet resistivity increases as the distance defined by a linear path between the two busbars(120, 130) decreases in order to improve uniform heating across the surface (see Fig. 5 and disclosed in Col. 3 lines 60-63 “The dot electrodes 140 is used for improving the conductivity of the electroconductive film 110, and is thereby employed to generate the uniform heat in the entire part thereof”) . Regarding claim 11, Park discloses, the material as defined in claim 9, wherein the sheet resistivity is decreased by providing conductive dots (see dot electrodes 140 in Figs. 4-5) in the conductive film (110), and wherein at least one of the number and density of the dots increases as the distance defined by a linear path between the two busbars increases (see annotated Fig. 5, wherein L2 is longer than L1, and L2 has more dots 140 than L1). PNG media_image1.png 414 642 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, Park discloses, heated goggles (see face shield in Fig. 5) comprising a lens (see weather lens 100 in Figs. 4-5) composed of the material as defined in claim 9 (see claim 9 cited above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VY T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571) 272-6015. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday approx. 9:00 am-5:00 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ibrahime Abraham can be reached on (571) 270-5569. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VY T NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 01, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680758
NON-WATER COOLED CONSUMABLE ELECTRODE VACUUM ARC FURNACE FOR CONTINUOUS PROCESS
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677986
LOCK STRUCTURE AND COOKING APPLIANCE
4y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673383
LASER PROCESSING MACHINE AND LASER PROCESSING METHOD
4y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672731
BEVERAGE MAKING DEVICE AND A SYSTEM FOR MAKING A BEVERAGE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660960
COOKING APPLIANCE, STRAINING DEVICE AND USE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+36.3%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 379 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month