DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 1, 2026 has been entered.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments, see Applicants’ remarks, filed April 27, 2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1, 12, 13 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Kim et al. (US 2010/0157880).
Kim teaches a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 1, Sections 0039, 0040, propagation delay, which is the communication delay, between the terminals and non-terrestrial entity).
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1 – 5, 9, 10, 12, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ravishankar (US 11,272,373) in view of Frederiksen et al. (US 2022/0091276) and in further view of Kim et al. (US 2010/0157880)
Regarding Claim 1, Ravishankar teaches a communication control apparatus that controls a terrestrial network comprising a terrestrial base station installed on a ground and capable of communicating with a communication device in a terrestrial communication cell provided by the terrestrial base station (Figure 2, base station (255)), and a non-terrestrial network comprising flying non-terrestrial base station and capable of communicating with a communication device in a non-terrestrial communication cell provided by the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite (210)) is the non-terrestrial base station, satellite base station (220) is the communication control apparatus (Col. 4 line 25)), wherein the non-terrestrial network is provided with an antenna capable of communicating with the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite terminal (230) communicates with the satellite (210)), and a non-terrestrial signal processing unit that processes non-terrestrial signal communicated with the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the antenna and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite base station (220) comprises processors, said satellite base station controls the resources of the satellite network and terrestrial network via the GRM in order to minimize interference (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64) thus said satellite base station would need to process non-terrestrial network (NTN) communications) and the communication control apparatus comprising: a non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit that shares, among the non-terrestrial signal processing unit and the terrestrial network, non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding a quality of the non-terrestrial communication via the non- terrestrial base station between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information with said satellite and terrestrial network); and a communication ratio determining unit that determines the ratio of the terrestrial network and the non-terrestrial network to be used for communication with communication device in an overlapping area of the terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, the allocation or distribution of resources to the satellite network and terrestrial network is the ratio, overlapping coverage area which is terrestrial coverage area (256) is within satellite coverage area (212) (See Figure 2)).
Ravishankar does not teach wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes a Doppler shift between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station; and a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station.
Frederiksen, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes a Doppler shift between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial base station (Section 0036, doppler shift between communication device and a non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar with the above features of Frederiksen for the purpose of compensating for doppler shift as taught by Frederiksen.
Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen does not teach a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station.
Kim, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 1, Sections 0039, 0040, propagation delay, which is the communication delay, between the terminals and non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen with the above features of Kim for the purpose minimizing long propagation round trip delay time thus providing low latency, which is a benefit of minimizing the propagation delay time.
Regarding Claim 12, Ravishankar teaches a communication control method that controls a terrestrial network comprising a terrestrial base station installed on a ground and capable of communicating with a communication device in a terrestrial communication cell provided by the terrestrial base station (Figure 2, base station (255)), and a non-terrestrial network comprising flying a non-terrestrial base station and capable of communicating with a communication device in a non-terrestrial communication cell provided by the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite (210) is the non-terrestrial base station), wherein the non-terrestrial network is provided with an antenna capable of communicating with the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite terminal (230) communicates with the satellite (210)), and a non-terrestrial signal processing unit that processes non-terrestrial signal communicated with the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the antenna and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite base station (220) comprises processors, said satellite base station controls the resources of the satellite network and terrestrial network via the GRM in order to minimize interference (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64) thus said satellite base station would need to process non-terrestrial network (NTN) communications), and the communication control method comprising: sharing, among the non-terrestrial signal processing unit and the terrestrial network, non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding a quality of the non-terrestrial communication via the non-terrestrial base station between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information with said satellite and terrestrial network); and determining a ratio of the terrestrial network and the non-terrestrial network to be used for communication with a communication device in an overlapping area of the terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, the allocation or distribution of resources to the satellite network and terrestrial network is the ratio, overlapping coverage area which is terrestrial coverage area (256) is within satellite coverage area (212) (See Figure 2)).
Ravishankar does not teach wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes a Doppler shift between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station; and a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station.
Frederiksen, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes a Doppler shift between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial base station (Section 0036, doppler shift between communication device and a non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar with the above features of Frederiksen for the purpose of compensating for doppler shift as taught by Frederiksen.
Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen does not teach a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station.
Kim, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 1, Sections 0039, 0040, propagation delay, which is the communication delay, between the terminals and non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen with the above features of Kim for the purpose minimizing long propagation round trip delay time thus providing low latency, which is a benefit of minimizing the propagation delay time.
Regarding Claim 13, Ravishankar teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a communication control program (Figure 2, satellite base station (220) is the communication control apparatus and comprises a processor that executes code stored in memory (226), Col. 5 line 18) that controls a terrestrial network comprising a terrestrial base station installed on a ground and capable of communicating with a communication device in a terrestrial communication cell provided by the terrestrial base station (Figure 2, base station (255)), and a non-terrestrial network comprising flying a non-terrestrial base station and capable of communicating with a communication device in a non-terrestrial communication cell provided by the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite (210)) is the non-terrestrial base station), wherein the non-terrestrial network is provided with an antenna capable of communicating with the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite terminal (230) communicates with the satellite (210)), and a non-terrestrial signal processing unit that processes non-terrestrial signal communicated with the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the antenna and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 2, satellite base station (220) comprises processors, said satellite base station controls the resources of the satellite network and terrestrial network via the GRM in order to minimize interference (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64) thus said satellite base station would need to process non-terrestrial network (NTN) communications), and the communication control program causing a computer to perform: sharing, among the non-terrestrial signal processing unit and the terrestrial network, non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding the quality of the non-terrestrial communication via the non-terrestrial base station between communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information with said satellite and terrestrial network); and determining a ratio of the terrestrial network and the non-terrestrial network to be used for communication with a communication device in an overlapping area of the terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, the allocation or distribution of resources to the satellite network and terrestrial network is the ratio, overlapping coverage area which is terrestrial coverage area (256) is within satellite coverage area (212) (See Figure 2)).
Ravishankar does not teach wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes a Doppler shift between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station; and a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station.
Frederiksen, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes a Doppler shift between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial base station (Section 0036, doppler shift between communication device and a non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar with the above features of Frederiksen for the purpose of compensating for doppler shift as taught by Frederiksen.
Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen does not teach a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station.
Kim, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches a communication delay between at least one of the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and the non-terrestrial base station (Figure 1, Sections 0039, 0040, propagation delay, which is the communication delay, between the terminals and non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen with the above features of Kim for the purpose minimizing long propagation round trip delay time thus providing low latency, which is a benefit of minimizing the propagation delay time.
Regarding Claim 2, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Ravishankar further teaches wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit is provided in the non-terrestrial signal processing unit (Figure 2, Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM is included in satellite base station and thus can be a part of the satellite base station’s architecture), and shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information obtained from the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the non-terrestrial base station and the antenna to the terrestrial network(Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information).
Regarding Claim 3, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 2. Ravishankar further teaches wherein the terrestrial network is connected to core network via the non-terrestrial signal processing unit (Figure 2, terrestrial network (256) can be connected to private network, which reads on a core network, via public network and satellite base station), the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information with the terrestrial network when the non-terrestrial communication quality information exceeds a predetermined threshold (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information, Col. 11 lines 63 – 67, allocation of resources such that a portion of said resources is muted, usage requirements being high can lead to high interference and thus interference exceeding a threshold), and the communication ratio determining unit changes the ratio of the terrestrial network and the non-terrestrial network used for communication with the communication device in the overlapping area of the terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information that exceeds the predetermined threshold (Col. 11 lines 63 – 67, allocation of resources such that a portion of said resources is muted, usage requirements being high can lead to high interference and thus interference exceeding a threshold, overlapping coverage area which is terrestrial coverage area (256) is within satellite coverage area (212) (See Figure 2)).
Regarding Claim 4, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Ravishankar further teaches wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit is provided in the terrestrial network (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM interacts with the terrestrial network for the purpose of allocating resources thus it is provided is said terrestrial network), and shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information obtained from the communication device in the terrestrial communication cell to the non-terrestrial signal processing unit (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information).
Regarding Claim 5, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 4. Ravishankar further teaches wherein the non-terrestrial signal processing unit is connected to core network via the terrestrial network (Figure 2, satellite base station is connected to private network (see arrow between satellite base station and the private network), said connection is on the earth thus rendering a terrestrial connection and thus use of a terrestrial network); the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information with the non-terrestrial signal processing unit when the non-terrestrial communication quality information exceeds a predetermined threshold (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information, GRM is controlled by the processors of the satellite base station thus said processors would participate in the sharing of the interference related information, Col. 11 lines 63 – 67, allocation of resources such that a portion of said resources is muted, usage requirements being high can lead to high interference and thus interference exceeding a threshold), and the communication ratio determining unit changes the ratio of the terrestrial network and the non-terrestrial network used for communication with the communication device in the overlapping area of the terrestrial communication cell and the non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information that exceeds the predetermined threshold (Col. 11 lines 63 – 67, allocation of resources such that a portion of said resources is muted, usage requirements being high can lead to high interference and thus interference exceeding a threshold, overlapping coverage area which is terrestrial coverage area (256) is within satellite coverage area (212) (See Figure 2)).
Regarding Claim 9, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Ravishankar does not teach wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes at least one of a Doppler shift between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell, the antenna and the non-terrestrial base station, and a communication delay between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell, the antenna and the non- terrestrial base station.
Frederiksen, which also teaches the use of satellites, teaches wherein the non-terrestrial communication quality information includes at least one of a Doppler shift between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell, the antenna and the non-terrestrial base station, and a communication delay between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell, the antenna and the non- terrestrial base station (Section 0036, doppler shift between communication device, which also has an antenna and a non-terrestrial entity).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar with the above features of Frederiksen for the purpose of compensating for doppler shift as taught by Frederiksen.
Regarding Claim 10, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Ravishankar further teaches wherein the non-terrestrial base station is a communication satellite flying in outer space (Figure 2, satellite (210)) is the non-terrestrial base station).
Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ravishankar (US 11,272,373) in view of Frederiksen et al. (US 2022/0091276) in view of Kim et al. (US 2010/0157880), as applied to Claim 1 set forth above, and further in view of Eichen (US 2021/0058146).
Regarding Claim 6, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim does not teach wherein the non-terrestrial signal processing unit is a baseband unit that processes the non-terrestrial signal in baseband.
Eichen, which also teaches use of satellites, teaches wherein the non-terrestrial signal processing unit is a baseband unit that processes the non-terrestrial signal in baseband (Section 0037, ground station comprises baseband equipment with interfaces for communications with DGSS logic and the internet thus will need to processing capability for processing said communications).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen and in further view of Kim with the above features of Eichen for the purpose of resolving conflicts between the incumbent users of atmospheric water sensors onboard Earth exploration satellites and 5G providers as taught by Eichen.
Claim(s) 7, 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ravishankar (US 11,272,373) in view of Frederiksen et al. (US 2022/0091276) in view of Kim et al. (US 2010/0157880) in view of Eichen (US 2021/0058146), as applied to Claim 6 set forth above, and further in view of Bachu et al. (US 2024/0097997).
Regarding Claim 7, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 6. Ravishankar further teaches the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information amongst itself and the terrestrial network (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information).
Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen does not teach the baseband unit comprises a distributed unit on the antenna side and a central unit on the core network side, and the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information among the central unit and the terrestrial network.
Bachu, which also teaches wireless communication, teaches baseband unit comprises a distributed unit on the antenna side and a central unit on the core network side (Figure 2, Section 0085, DU closer to the RUs, which are close to antennas).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen with the above features of Bachu for the purpose of providing enhanced scalability and resource efficiency, which are benefits of a CU/DU split. The combination of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen and Bachu teaches the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information among the central unit and the terrestrial network
Regarding Claim 8, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 7. Ravishankar further teaches shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information obtained from the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the non-terrestrial base station and the antenna (Col. 5 lines 58 – 64, GRM allocating resources among the satellite and terrestrial networks based on interference thus there is an implicit sharing of interference related information).
Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen does not teach wherein the distributed unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information obtained from the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the non-terrestrial base station and the antenna to the central unit.
Bachu, which also teaches wireless communication, teaches a distributed unit and a central unit (Figure 2, Section 0085, DU closer to the RUs, which are close to antennas).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim in view of Eichen with the above features of Bachu for the purpose of providing enhanced scalability and resource efficiency, which are benefits of a CU/DU split. The combination of Ravishankar combination and Bachu teaches wherein the distributed unit shares the non-terrestrial communication quality information obtained from the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell via the non-terrestrial base station and the antenna to the central unit.
Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ravishankar (US 11,272,373) in view of Frederiksen et al. (US 2022/0091276) in view of Kim et al. (US 2010/0157880), as applied to Claim 1 set forth above, and further in view of Jeong et al. (US 2016/0006499)
Regarding Claim 11, Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim teaches all of the claimed limitations recited in Claim 1. Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim does not teach a second non-terrestrial network comprising flying a second non-terrestrial base station and capable of communicating with a communication device in a second non-terrestrial communication cell provided by the second non-terrestrial base station, wherein the second non-terrestrial network is provided with a second antenna capable of communicating with the second non-terrestrial base station, and a second non-terrestrial signal processing unit that processes a second non-terrestrial signal communicated with the communication device in the second non-terrestrial communication cell via the second antenna and the second non-terrestrial base station, and the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit that shares, among the non-terrestrial signal processing unit and the second non-terrestrial signal processing unit, non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding the quality of the non-terrestrial communication via the non-terrestrial base station between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and second non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding a quality of the second non-terrestrial communication via the second non-terrestrial base station between the communication device in the second non-terrestrial communication cell and the second antenna; and the communication ratio determining unit that determines a ratio of the non-terrestrial network and the second non-terrestrial network to be used for communication with communication device in an overlapping area of the non-terrestrial communication cell and the second non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information and the second non-terrestrial communication quality information.
Jeong, which also teaches a satellite system, teaches a second non-terrestrial network comprising flying a second non-terrestrial base station and capable of communicating with a communication device in a second non-terrestrial communication cell provided by the second non-terrestrial base station (Section 0101, second satellite network will comprise satellites that communicate with ground terminals in the footprint of said satellites), wherein the second non-terrestrial network is provided with a second antenna capable of communicating with the second non-terrestrial base station (Section 0101, the ground terminals in the footprint of the satellite will have antennas in order to communicate with said satellite), and a second non-terrestrial signal processing unit that processes a second non-terrestrial signal communicated with the communication device in the second non-terrestrial communication cell via the second antenna and the second non-terrestrial base station (Figure 1, satellite network operation management device (30) will have a processor for processing signals communicated in the satellite network); and the non-terrestrial communication quality information sharing unit that shares, among the non-terrestrial signal processing unit and the second non-terrestrial signal processing unit, non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding the quality of the non-terrestrial communication via the non-terrestrial base station between the communication device in the non-terrestrial communication cell and the antenna, and second non-terrestrial communication quality information regarding a quality of the second non-terrestrial communication via the second non-terrestrial base station between the communication device in the second non-terrestrial communication cell and the second antenna (predicting apparatus predicts the interference which is a quality metric that affects both satellite networks (Sections 0102, 0103, 0104); and the communication ratio determining unit that determines a ratio of the non-terrestrial network and the second non-terrestrial network to be used for communication with communication device in an overlapping area of the non-terrestrial communication cell and the second non-terrestrial communication cell based on the non-terrestrial communication quality information and the second non-terrestrial communication quality information (Section 0104, compensation for interference between both satellite networks renders adjustment in communication resources in both satellite networks which is the ratio).
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Ravishankar in view of Frederiksen in view of Kim with the above features of Jeong for the purpose of enabling multiple satellite networks to coexist as taught by Jeong.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND S DEAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7877. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 6:00-2:30, EST.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached at 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/RAYMOND S DEAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645 Raymond S. Dean
June 5, 2026
Prosecution Insights