Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/917,623

DATA COLLECTION METHOD, DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 07, 2022
Examiner
MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tsubakimoto Chain Co.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
751 granted / 898 resolved
+31.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
937
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§102
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 898 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The Amendment filed 1/16/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 17 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yanai et al. (JP H11349114 A) in view of Chavez et al. (US 10,549,928). Yanai discloses a data collection method implemented by one or more processors (10) connected to a sorting machine sorting articles to different sorting destinations (see “Field of the Invention”), the method comprising: acquiring, by the one or more processors, an identification code (6) of an article from a reader (6) provided on the sorting machine for identifying the article being loaded into the sorting machine; acquiring, by the one or more processors, after the article has been read by the reader, image data of the article identified by the identification code from a camera (16), at the time when the article identified by the identification code enters angles of view of the camera; and storing, by the one or more processors, the acquired image data so as to be associated with the acquired identification code. The camera is disposed on a downstream side of the reader in the sorting machine (see Fig. 1). Yanai discloses all the limitations of the claims, but it does not disclose a plurality of cameras that are attached so as to image the same article at different angles. Rather, Yanai discloses utilizing only one camera. However, Chavez discloses a similar method which includes utilizing a plurality of cameras (114, 1126) that are attached so as to image the same article at different angles (see Fig. 1) for the purpose of ensuring that an article is properly identified. It would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the applicant’s invention to modify Yanai by utilizing a plurality of cameras that are attached so as to image the same article at different angles, as disclosed by Chavez, for the purpose of ensuring that an article is properly identified. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-11 and 13-16 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 17 and 18 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK HEWEY MACKEY whose telephone number is (571)272-6916. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at 571-272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK H MACKEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600493
AUTOMATED BAGGAGE HANDLING CARTS AND SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577060
CARD ATTACHMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565379
STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12565380
INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS FOR INTELLIGENT THREE-DIMENSIONAL WAREHOUSE, CONTROLLING METHODS AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREROF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558710
PARCEL SINGULATION YIELD CORRECTING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 898 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month