Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 13, 2026
Application No. 17/918,795

COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A NONIONIC ADDITIVE AND A NONIONIC RINSE SURFACTANT AND THE USE THEREOF FOR REDUCING DEPOSITION OF FAT ON A SURFACE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 13, 2022
Priority
Jul 02, 2020 — EU 20183691.3 +1 more
Examiner
MRUK, BRIAN P
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
BASF SE
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
982 granted / 1323 resolved
+9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1366
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§112
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1323 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to Applicant’s amendment filed May 11, 2026. Claims 12-13 remain withdrawn from consideration. Applicant has amended claim 1. Claim 2 has been cancelled. Currently, claims 1 and 3-17 remain pending in the application. The text of those sections of Title 35 U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in the prior Office action, Paper No. 20260310. The rejection of claims 5-6 and 14-17 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, is maintained for the reasons of record. The rejection of claims 1, 3-11 and 14-17 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mussman et al, US 2016/0362633, is maintained for the reasons of record. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed May 11, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that instant claim 5 is not indefinite, since the instantly claimed method has the step of “using”. However, the examiner respectfully disagrees. Specifically, the examiner respectfully maintains that since the claim does not set forth any steps involved in the method, it is unclear what method applicant is intending to encompass. A claim is indefinite where it merely recites a use without any active, positive steps delimiting how this use is actually practiced. The examiner suggests that claim 5 should be amended to recite a positive step, such as “applying the cleaning composition to a surface” or “contacting a surface with the cleaning composition”. Applicant further argues that Mussman et al, US 2016/0362633, does not teach or suggest in general a composition that contains a rinse surfactant of formula (II) or formula (III), as required by applicant in the instant claims. However, the examiner respectfully disagrees. Specifically, the examiner respectfully maintains that Mussman et al clearly discloses that their composition contains a second fatty alcohol of formula II, wherein R2 is an alkyl group having 10-16 carbon atoms, R3 is an alkyl group having 2-26 carbon atoms, AO is -CH2CH2-, and w is 10-30 (see paragraph 22), which meets rinse surfactant (III) of the instant claims when R7 is C10-16, x is 10-30, y is zero, R9 is hydrogen, and R8 is C10-20, per the requirements of the instant invention. Furthermore, the examiner asserts that applicant’s Examples I, II, IV and V in Tables 5, 6, 8 and 9 of the instant specification are not commensurate in scope with the instant claims, as required in MPEP 716.02(d), since the base mixture detergent and specific compounds (A.1), (A.2) and (B.1) in these Examples are not required in independent claim 1. Accordingly, the examiner asserts that applicant has not shown that the unexpected results occur over the entire claim range. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN P MRUK whose telephone number is (571)272-1321. The examiner can normally be reached on 7:00am-5:30pm Monday-Thursday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached on 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN P MRUK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 Brian P Mruk June 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703827
Composition with Mixed C8-C18 Alcohols and Surfactants Thereof
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692460
A UNIT DOSE TABLET COMPOSITION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680057
FABRIC CARE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673793
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANUFACTURING A SHEET OF LAUNDRY DETERGENT
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674118
STABLE ANHYDROUS DISH SOAP AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.8%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1323 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month