Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/919,218

INITIAL ACCESS AND RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL PROCEDURES FOR REDUCED CAPABILITY DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 14, 2022
Priority
Nov 03, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021128434
Examiner
GEORGE, AYANAH S
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
446 granted / 514 resolved
+28.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
546
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
84.8%
+44.8% vs TC avg
§102
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 514 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is a response to an amendment filed on 1/30/26 in which claims 26-36 and 46-55 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 26-28, 32, 46, 47 and 52-55 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lei et al. (Pub. No.: 2021/0195654), herein Lei and Fei et al. WO 2023/011071 A1, herein Fei. As to claim 26, Lei teaches a method of operating a base station, the method comprising: generating system information to configure bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) (Lei [0108] At 710, the apparatus may communicate with the UE based on the indication of the reduced UE capability and within a downlink and uplink bandwidth part (BWP) configuration associated with a corresponding UE capability, wherein the downlink and uplink BWP configuration is broadcast in system information of the base station); and transmitting outputting the system information for transmission in a broadcast message (Lei [0108] the downlink and uplink BWP configuration is broadcast in system information of the base station); Lei does not teach configure an initial downlink (DL)/(DL) or uplink (UL) bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) However Fei does teach configure an initial downlink (DL)/(DL) or uplink (UL) bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) (Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP configuration information of common UEs and the initial UL BWP configuration information of RedCap UEs may be broadcast and sent by the base station in the system information) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei with Fei, because Fei teaches us page 18 lines 14-16 the base station configures different initial UL BWPs for the RedCap UE. As to claim 46, Lei teaches at least one non-transitory, computer-readable media having instructions that, when executed, cause processor circuitry to (Lei Fig. 3 memory and processor): generate system information to configure bandwidth part (BWP) for reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) (Lei [0108] At 710, the apparatus may communicate with the UE based on the indication of the reduced UE capability and within a downlink and uplink bandwidth part (BWP) configuration associated with a corresponding UE capability, wherein the downlink and uplink BWP configuration is broadcast in system information of the base station); and output the system information for transmission in a broadcast message (Lei [0108] the downlink and uplink BWP configuration is broadcast in system information of the base station); Lei does not teach configure an initial downlink (DL)/(DL) or uplink (UL) bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) However Fei does teach configure an initial downlink (DL)/(DL) or uplink (UL) bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) (Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP configuration information of common UEs and the initial UL BWP configuration information of RedCap UEs may be broadcast and sent by the base station in the system information) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei with Fei for the same reasons stated in claim 26. As to claim 52, Lei teaches a method of: receiving system information to configure bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) (Lei [0108] At 710, the apparatus may communicate with the UE based on the indication of the reduced UE capability and within a downlink and uplink bandwidth part (BWP) configuration associated with a corresponding UE capability, wherein the downlink and uplink BWP configuration is broadcast in system information of the base station); and utilizing the initial DL or UL BWP for UL or DL transmissions (Lei [0108] At 710, the apparatus may communicate with the UE based on the indication of the reduced UE capability and within a downlink and uplink bandwidth part (BWP) configuration associated with a corresponding UE capability) Lei does not teach configure an initial downlink (DL)/(DL) or uplink (UL) bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) However Fei does teach configure an initial downlink (DL)/(DL) or uplink (UL) bandwidth part (BWP) dedicated to reduced-capability (redcap) user equipments (UEs) (Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP configuration information of common UEs and the initial UL BWP configuration information of RedCap UEs may be broadcast and sent by the base station in the system information) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei with Fei for the same reasons stated in claim 26. As to claim 27, the combination of Lei and Fei teach the method of claim 26, wherein the broadcast message comprises a system information block 1 (SIB 1) or a system information bock-redcap (SIB redcap) (Lei [0108] At 710, the apparatus may communicate with the UE based on the indication of the reduced UE capability and within a downlink and uplink bandwidth part (BWP) configuration associated with a corresponding UE capability, wherein the downlink and uplink BWP configuration is broadcast in system information of the base station); Claims 47 and 53 are rejected for the same reasons stated in claim 27. As to claim 28, the combination of Lei and Fei teach the method of claim 26, wherein the initial DL OR UL BWP comprises an initial DL BWP and the system information includes an indication of a frequency location and bandwidth of the initial DL or UL BWP (Lei [0096] downlink and uplink BWP configuration and Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP) Claims 48 and 54 are rejected for the same reasons stated in claim 28. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei with Fei for the same reasons stated in claim 26. As to claim 32, the combination of Lei and Fei teach the method of claim 31, wherein the redcap-dedicated parameters comprise a number of frequency-domain multiplexed RACH occasions, a power- ramping step, a time-domain periodicity, a time-domain density, or a number of synchronization signal blocks associated with a valid RACH occasion (Lei [0061] Aspects of the present disclosure can include an implicit indication of reduced UE capabilities for reduced capability (redcap) UEs or light UEs. This implicit indication of reduced UE capabilities may occur at a certain time period, e.g., prior to an RRC connection. And [0084] At 570, base station 504 may transmit, to the UE, a UE capability reduction instruction, e.g., instruction 574, via a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), where the UE capability reduction instruction includes an identifier of the UE and a capability reduction time period, where capability reduction time period is a time period where the UE capability reduction takes effect) Claim(s) 29, 49 and 55 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lei, Fei and Lei2 et al. (Pub. No.: 2022/0104109), herein Lei2. As to claim 29, Lei teaches the method of claim 26, wherein the initial DL or UL BWP comprises an initial DL BWP (Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP configuration information of common UEs and the initial UL BWP configuration information of RedCap UEs may be broadcast and sent by the base station in the system information) Lei nor Fei teach and the system information includes an indication of a common search space dedicated to redcap UEs, the common search space for a random access message, a system information block (SIB), or a paging message However Lei2- does teach and the system information includes an indication of a common search space dedicated to redcap UEs, the common search space for a random access message, a system information block (SIB), or a paging message (Lei2 claim 11 The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining a set of additional system informations for reduced-capability UEs which may be requested based at least in part on the information included in the dedicated field or in the configuration information element, wherein the set of additional system informations include synchronization signal blocks, downlink broadcast reference signals, control resource set configurations, common search space configurations for random access procedures, paging) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei and Fei with Lei2, because Lei2 teaches us [0320] receiving first system information from a base station, the first system information being for reduced-capability UEs comprising UEs with a bandwidth capability below a threshold, the UE being a reduced-capability UE; evaluating the first system information for a dedicated field that includes an indicator that additional system information for reduced-capability UEs is to be received in response to on-demand requests; and obtaining the additional system information for reduced-capability UEs in accordance with information included in either the dedicated field when the dedicated field is included in the first system information or in a configuration information element of the first system information when the dedicated field is absent from the first system information. Claims 49 and 55 are rejected for the same reasons stated in claim 28. Claim(s) 30 and 50 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lei, Fei and Geng et al. (Pub. No.: 2021/0058879), herein Geng. As to claim 30, the combination of Lei and Fei teach the method of claim 26, wherein the initial DL or UL BWP comprises an initial DL BWP (Lei [0096] downlink and uplink BWP configuration Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP configuration information of common UEs and the initial UL BWP configuration information of RedCap UEs may be broadcast and sent by the base station in the system information) Lei nor Fei teach and the system information includes an indication of a location of a non-cell-defined synchronization signal block. However Geng does teach and the system information includes an indication of a location of a non-cell-defined synchronization signal block (Geng [0016] In a possible implementation, the second information includes frequency information and type information of a second synchronization signal block. In this implementation, the network device can indicate locations of the cell-defined synchronization signal block and the non-cell-defined synchronization signal block to the terminal) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei and Fei with Geng, because Geng teaches us [0003] The synchronization signal blocks are classified, according to types, into a cell-defined (cell defining) synchronization signal block and a non-cell-defined (non cell defining) synchronization signal block. The cell-defined synchronization signal block supports initial access, camping, cell reselection, or cell selection of the terminal, and the non-cell-defined synchronization signal block does not support initial access, camping, cell reselection, or cell selection of the terminal. The terminal measures the non-cell-defined synchronization signal block, but cannot perform initial access, camping, cell reselection, or cell selection on the corresponding synchronization signal block. Consequently, unnecessary power consumption of the terminal is caused. Claim 50 is rejected for the same reasons stated in claim 30. Claim(s) 31 and 51 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lei, Fei and Wang et al. (WO 2021/112740 A1), herein Wang. As to claim 31, Lei teaches the method of claim 26, wherein the initial DL or UL BWP comprises an initial UL BWP (Lei [0096] downlink and uplink BWP configuration Fei page 18 lines 21-22 the initial UL BWP configuration information of common UEs and the initial UL BWP configuration information of RedCap UEs may be broadcast and sent by the base station in the system information) Lei nor Fei teach and the system information comprises redcap- dedicated parameters for uplink transmission during a random access channel (RACH) procedure. However Wang does teach and the system information comprises redcap- dedicated parameters for uplink transmission during a random access channel (RACH) procedure (Wang page 8 lines 20-23 the first downlink message can be adapted for use in the random access configuration, for example the first downlink message may be a SIB1 carrying information about how the physical random access channel is configured) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei and Fei with Wang, because Wang teaches us a way to allow wireless devices such as bandwidth restricted devices to use a network supporting large bandwidths page 1 line 33-34. Claim 51 is rejected for the same reasons stated in claim 31. Claim(s) 33 and 34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lei, Fei and Asustek et al. (NPL: Discussion on aspects related to reduced maximum UE bandwidth), herein Asustek As to claim 33, Lei and Fei teach the method of claim 26, Lei nor Fei teach wherein the initial DL or UL BWP comprises an initial UL BWP and the system information comprises redcap- dedicated parameters for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmissions, the redcap- dedicated parameters to include a resource block offset for PUCCH-redcap resources with respect to a lowest physical resource block (PRB) of the initial UL BWP. However Asustek does teach wherein the initial DL or UL BWP comprises an initial UL BWP and the system information comprises redcap- dedicated parameters for physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmissions, the redcap- dedicated parameters to include a resource block offset for PUCCH-redcap resources with respect to a lowest physical resource block (PRB) of the initial UL BWP (Asustek page 2 agreements separate PUCCH configuration indicates the PUCCH is within the RedCap UE bandwidth and the initial UL BWP is the same for RedCap and non-RedCap) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei and Fei with Asustek, because Asustek teaches us the initial UL BWP for a RedCap UE can be the same as the UL BWP for the non RedCap and sharing CORESET#0 (Asustk page 2 agreements and line 1) As to claim 34, the combination of Lei, Fei and Asustek teach the method of claim 26, wherein the initial DL or UL BWP comprises an initial UL BWP and the system information comprises an indication of whether frequency hopping is enabled or disabled for a physical uplink control channel transmission (Asustek page 2 separate PUCCH same configuration for RedCap whether frequency hopping is disabled) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei and Fei with Asustek for the same reasons stated in claim 33. Claim(s) 35 and 36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lei, Fei and Hwang et al. (Pub. No.: 2023/0043139 A1), herein Hwang. As to claim 35, Lei and Fei teach the method of claim 26, further comprising: generating, for transmission, and transmitting downlink control information (DCI) to indicate a modification for redcap-specific configuration (Lei [0071] Aspects of the present disclosure can also include a switch of UE capabilities. For instance, for premium UEs, e.g., UEs equipped with more advanced capabilities than reduced capability or light UEs, a temporary switch to reduced capabilities may help to improve power savings and/or radio resource utilization efficiency. In some instances, a base station can transmit a PDCCH to instruct one or more UEs to reduce their capabilities within a configurable time interval. Further, the DCI can include the UE identifiers and/or the time interval when a capability reduction may take effect. Also, the UE can request a capability reduction within a configurable time interval) Lei nor Fei teach broadcast control channel (BCCH) However Hwang does teach broadcast control channel (BCCH) (Hwang Fig. 1 BCCH) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei and Fei with Hwang, because Hwang teaches us [0208] The information about the BCCH modification and ETWS/CMAS notification included in the short message may be information that must be broadcast continuously for a certain period of time without changing instantaneously. As to claim 36, the combination of Lei, Fei and Hwang teach the method of claim 35, wherein: the DCI comprises DCI format 1_0 having an indication of the BCCH modification as a bit within a first field that is a short message field or a second field; the DCI comprises DCI format 1_0 and the method further comprises using a paging radio network temporary identifier (P-RNTI) or scrambling sequence to scramble cyclic redundancy check (CRC) bits of the DCI format 1_0 to provide an indication of the BCCH modification; or the method further comprises transmitting the DCI within a common search space configured for redcap UEs to provide an indication of the BCCH modification (Hwang [0188] The short message of the current NR standard may be used in the paging DCI for the purpose of providing BCCH modification information (systemInfoModification)) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Lei, Fei and Hwang for the same reasons stated in claim 35. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 1/30/26, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 under 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Fei. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AYANAH S GEORGE whose telephone number is (571)272-8880. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached at 572-272-3940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. AYANAH S. GEORGE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2467 /AYANAH S GEORGE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684366
DYNAMIC SPECTRUM SHARING OVERHEAD IMPACT MITIGATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12652567
PRE-CONFIGURED GAP STATUS AT GAP CONFIGURATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12641676
RADIO FREQUENCY SENSING WITH POWER SAVINGS
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635030
METHOD FOR PROCESSING DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION PARAMETER, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROCESSOR
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634360
METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND SYSTEMS FOR NETWORK ANALYSIS
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 514 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month