Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/919,697

Ozonising module and remote management system of a plurality of such modules

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Oct 18, 2022
Priority
Apr 21, 2020 — IT 102020000008470 +2 more
Examiner
TAI, XIUYU
Art Unit
1795
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
O3Zy SA
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 1017 resolved
-6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1043
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
70.8%
+30.8% vs TC avg
§102
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1017 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “a comparison between an ozone threshold concentration and a concentration signal coming from said ozone sensor”. It is not clear how to compare concentration with a signal. Appropriate correction/clarification is required. For the purpose of examination, the above limitation will be interpreted as “a comparison between an ozone threshold concentration and a concentration coming from said ozone sensor” Claim 3 recites “said ozone sensor is self-contained and apt to be moved away from said ozone generator”. It is not clear what this limitation is regarded (e.g., self-contained? Moved away..?) . Appropriate correction/clarification is required. Claim 5 recites “a conveyor duct” and “a deviator duct”. It is not clear what these limitations are regarded. Also, it is not clear how each component is arranged with respect to a conveyor duct, a fan, an inlet opening thereof, with a deviator duct at an exit thereof. Appropriate correction/clarification is required. Due to the dependency to the parent claim, claims 2-10 are rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Garner (PG-PUB US 2010/0047116). Regarding claim 1, Garner discloses a sterilization apparatus using ozone (ABSTRACT). The apparatus comprises (1) an ozone generator 6 within a housing 21 (i.e., an ozone assembly is housed, Figures 1-3, paragraph [0032]); (2) an ozone sensor 30 coupled to a controller 15, wherein the controller 15 integrated with a timer controls the operation of the apparatus by setting pre-determined ozone concentration having desired exposure duration and comparing the measured ozone concentration from the ozone sensor to pre-determined ozone concentration in order to achieve desired sterilization (i.e., an ozone sensor … a control unit …, Figures 1-3, paragraphs [0012], [0034] , [0051], [0055] –[0060], & Example 1); and (3) a catalytic filter element 4 for removing ozone by flowing air through an intake 17 to an exit port 16 (i.e., ozone reducing means consisting of a filter assembly with catalytic action … by means of respective controlled ventilation means, Figures 1-3, paragraphs [0031] & [0035]). Since the claim does not specify “an ozone threshold concentration”, it will be interpreted as “a pre-determined ozone concentration”. Garner teaches to dose a pre-determined amount of ozone to achieve desired degree of sterilization (paragraphs [0012], [0034] , [0051], [0055] –[0060], & Example 1), reading on “an ozone threshold concentration”. Regarding claim 2, Garner teaches that the controller connected to some components of the apparatus, such as a the ozone sensor, through electronic connection to a network (paragraphs [0034] & [0051]). Regarding claim 3, Garner teaches that the electronic connections may be wireless and the ozone sensor 30 disposed away from the ozone generator 6 is provided within a self-contained housing 20 (Figures 1-3, paragraphs [0011], & [0034]). Regarding claim 4, Garner teaches a motion/presence sensor 18 (Figure 1, paragraph [0034]). Regarding claim 5, Garner teaches that the ozone generator is provided within a conduit/channel having an inlet and an outlet while a fan is provided around the inlet of the conduit/channel (Figures 1 & 11, paragraphs [0031], & [0048]). Regarding claim 6, Garner teaches that audible or visual alarm may be provided (paragraph [0034]). Regarding claim 7, Garner teaches a temperature sensor (Example 1). Regarding claim 8, Garner teaches that the controller include a programmable means (paragraph [0034]). Regarding claim 9, Garner teaches that two or more sterilization systems may be used and the controller 15 connects to a network through a communication system (paragraphs [0034], & [0055]). Regarding claim 10, Garner teaches that the controller can store a date base of sterilization with user input (paragraphs [0034], [0058], & [0063]). Conclusion Claims 1-10 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIUYU TAI whose telephone number is (571)270-1855. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Luan Van can be reached at 571-272-8521. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIUYU TAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Apr 16, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636616
PAPER-BASED MICRO-CONCENTRATOR, BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE DETECTION DEVICE AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE DETECTION METHOD
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630423
OZONISER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING OZONE FROM OXYGEN
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630481
MATERIAL SURFACE TREATMENT EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD AND SILICON CARBIDE MATERIAL SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624853
AIR PURIFIER
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611481
AIR CLEANING DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.8%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1017 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month