Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/920,470

RADIO TERMINAL, CENTER SERVER APPARATUS, AND METHOD THEREFOR

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Mar 29, 2023
Priority
Apr 27, 2020 — JP 2020-078447 +1 more
Examiner
KAUR, PAMIT
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
508 granted / 633 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
86.7%
+46.7% vs TC avg
§102
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 633 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 29, 30, 32, 33, 45, 46, 48-58 are subject under examination. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 29, 30, 32, 33, 45, 46, 48 and 49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 13,29 and 45 Applicant is claiming “receive, from a policy control Function (PCF) apparatus that is configured to receive an Application Function (AF) request and to thereby update the SMF, the updated policy information including a cell identifier”. It is unclear if applicant is trying to claim receive an Application Function (AF) request and receive updated policy information including a cell identifier or is applicant trying to claim receive an Application Function (AF) request to thereby update the SMF and to update the policy information including a cell identifier. Further, it is unclear how the SMF is updated? Is it updated by providing the new/ updated policy information? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13,14, 29, 30, 32, 33, 45, 46, 48, 49, 53 and 56 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Li (US 20190357301 A1) and DAO US 20190394279 A1 in view of Faccin (US 20180227743 A1). Regarding claim 29, Li teaches A Session Management Function (SMF) apparatus See para 0193 “serving SMF 310”) , comprising: at least one memory storing instructions; and at least one processor configured to execute the instructions to thereby (see para 0008 “a network node including at least one network interface, at least one processor, and a non-transient computer readable memory for storing instructions which when executed by the at least one processor configure the network node to execute the methods disclosed herein”) and configured to: Receive, from a Policy Control Function (PCF) apparatus that is configured to receive an Application Function (AF) request and to thereby update an SMF, (see para 0193 “The PCF 316 generates or update 1230 PCC rule(s) according to the AF request received 1228. The PCF 316 notifies 1232 the PCC rule(s) to the serving SMF 310 of the PDU Session according to a subscription of the SMF to such notifications”; and Based on the updated policy information from the PCF apparatus, determine whether to perform relocation of a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) Session Anchor (PSA) User Plane Function (UPF) (see para 0087 “he SMF may, based on local policies, take the information in the PCC rules into account to (re)select UPF(s) for PDU Sessions”), wherein a user plane (UP) path is configured with the relocation of the PSA UPF, the UP path being configured between a user equipment (UE) and a data network (DN) see para 0067 “In the presence of UE mobility, it may result in frequent UPF relocation…UE-1 moves from position X1 to X2, its PSA (PDU session Anchor) relocates frequently from A1, to A2, to A3, and finally to A4.”; see para 0088 “In the case of UP path reselection, the SMF may configure the source UPF to forward traffic to the UL CL/BP so that the traffic is steered towards the target UPF.” para 0006 “the PSA is a UPF through which a UP path of the PDU session is connected to a data network (DN).”)[ UP path reselection is interpreted as UP path reconfigured]. Li doesn’t teach updated policy information including a cell identifier DAO US 20190394279 A1 teaches updated policy information including a cell identifier (see para 0042 “the location element comprises at least one of a …. a RAN address, a cell identifier”; see para 0129 “the PCF 201 may inform the SMF 92 of the applicable indication(s) for the location information element and/or the time information element of individual policy rules”). Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine updated policy information including a cell identifier in the system of Li. The motivation is to optimize operation of user equipment in wireless communication networks (Dao: see para 0002) Li doesn’t teach send N2 Session Management (SM) information including the cell identifier to an access and Mobility Management Function (AMF). Faccin (US 20180227743 A1) teaches send N2 Session Management (SM) information including the cell identifier to an access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) (see para 0101 “SMF 225-c may send UPF location information, such as a PSAC value, to AMF 210-a”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine send N2 Session Management (SM) information including the cell identifier to an access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) in the system of Li. The motivation is to support the efficient communication. (faccin: See para 0039). Regarding claim 45, Li teaches a method performed by a Session Management Function (SMF) apparatus (see para 0193 “SMF 310”), the method comprising: receiving from a Policy Control Function (PCF) apparatus that is configured to receive an Application Functi SMF 310on (AF) request and to thereby update an SMF see para 0193 “The PCF 316 generates or update 1230 PCC rule(s) according to the AF request received 1228. The PCF 316 notifies 1232 the PCC rule(s) to the serving of the PDU Session”); and based on receiving the updated policy information from the PCF apparatus, determining whether to perform relocation of a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) Session Anchor (PSA) User Plane Function (UPF) see para 0087 “he SMF may, based on local policies, take the information in the PCC rules into account to (re)select UPF(s) for PDU Sessions”), wherein a user plane (UP) path is configured with the relocation of the PSA UPF, the UP path being configured between a user equipment (UE) and a data network (DN), see para 0067 “In the presence of UE mobility, it may result in frequent UPF relocation…UE-1 moves from position X1 to X2, its PSA (PDU session Anchor) relocates frequently from A1, to A2, to A3, and finally to A4.”; see para 0088 “In the case of UP path reselection, the SMF may configure the source UPF to forward traffic to the UL CL/BP so that the traffic is steered towards the target UPF.” para 0006 “the PSA is a UPF through which a UP path of the PDU session is connected to a data network (DN).”)[ UP path reselection is interpreted as UP path reconfigured],, Li doesn’t teach updated policy information including a cell identifier DAO US 20190394279 A1 teaches updated policy information including a cell identifier (see para 0042 “the location element comprises at least one of a …. a RAN address, a cell identifier”; see para 0129 “the PCF 201 may inform the SMF 92 of the applicable indication(s) for the location information element and/or the time information element of individual policy rules”). Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine updated policy information including a cell identifier in the system of Li. The motivation is to optimize operation of user equipment in wireless communication networks (Dao: see para 0002) Li doesn’t teach send N2 Session Management (SM) information including the cell identifier to an access and Mobility Management Function (AMF). Faccin (US 20180227743 A1) teaches send N2 Session Management (SM) information including the cell identifier to an access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) (see para 0101 “SMF 225-c may send UPF location information, such as a PSAC value, to AMF 210-a”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine send N2 Session Management (SM) information including the cell identifier to an access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) in the system of Li. The motivation is to support the efficient communication. (faccin: See para 0039). Regarding claim 30, 46, Li teaches wherein the PCF apparatus is configured to receive the AF request via a Network Exposure Function (NEF) apparatus (see para 0023 “there is provided a method for execution at a Network Exposure Function. The method comprises receiving, from an Application Function (AF), an application selection notification setup request; transmitting, towards a Policy Control Function (PCF), an application selection notification setup request”) Regarding claims 32 and 48, Li doesn’t teach wherein the UP path is reconfigured by reestablishing a PDU session using session and service continuity mode 2. Faccin teaches wherein the UP path is reconfigured by reestablishing a PDU session using session and service continuity mode 2. (see para 0063 “n SSC Mode 2, the DN 235 may trigger a release of a PDU session (e.g., and the associated UPF 230), and may transmit instructions to UE 115-a to establish a new PDU session.”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the reconfiguration of the UP path is done by re- establishing a PDU Session using Session and Service Continuity (SSC) mode 2 in the system of Li. The motivation is to support the efficient communication. (faccin: See para 0039) Regarding claims 33 and 49, Li doesn’t teach wherein the UP path is reconfigured by re establishing a PDU Session using Session and Service Continuity (SSC) mode 3. Faccin teaches wherein wherein the UP path is reconfigured by re establishing a PDU Session using Session and Service Continuity (SSC) mode 3. (see para0063 “In SSC Mode 3, UE 115-a may establish a different connection or registration (e.g., using a new UPF 230) with a DN 235 while UE 115-a has an established PDU session with the same DN 235.”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the reconfiguration of the UP path is done by re- establishing a PDU Session using Session and Service Continuity (SSC) mode 3 in the system of Li. The motivation is to support the efficient communication. (faccin: See para 0039). Regarding claim 53,56, Li doesn’t teach the cell identifier includes a physical cell ID (PCI). Dao teaches the cell identifier includes a physical cell ID (PCI) ( see para 0029 “ at least one information element can comprise a location element. In an embodiment, the location element can comprise at least one of a geographical location specified by a 2D and/or a 3D coordinate system, a geographical location specified by an identifier of a geographical zone of a mapping system, a RAN address, a cell identifier, a TAI”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the cell identifier includes a physical cell ID (PCI) in the system of Li. The motivation is to optimize operation of user equipment in wireless communication networks (Dao: see para 0002) Claim(s) 54,55, 57 and 58 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Li (US 20190357301 A1) and DAO US 20190394279 A1 in view of Faccin (US 20180227743 A1) and further in view of Tsai (US 20190045404 A1). Regarding claim 54, 57, Li doesn’t teach wherein the cell identifier is an identifier of a candidate secondary cell group (SCG) cell for dual connectivity (DC). Tsai teaches wherein the cell identifier is an identifier of a candidate secondary cell group (SCG) cell for dual connectivity (DC). (see para 0028 “the UE sends assistant information to enable fast DC configuration. The assistant information could be an indication to tell the network that the UE is configured with DC configuration before the fallback to 2G/3G. The assistant information could be an information element (IE) in RRC message that contains some cell ID(s). The cell ID(s) is the suggested cell(s) for SCG configuration”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the cell identifier is an identifier of a candidate secondary cell group (SCG) cell for dual connectivity (DC) in the system of modified Li. The motivation is to improve system capacity (Tsai: see para 0003) Regarding claim 55 and 58, Li doesn’t teach wherein the N2 SM information requests addition of the candidate SCG cells as an SCG Cell in DC for the UE. Tsai teaches the N2 SM information requests addition of the candidate SCG cells as an SCG Cell in DC for the UE. (See para 0030 “MeNB 402 sends an RRC connection reconfiguration message to UE 401 for adding SCG cell(s) based on the assistant information provided by the UE….As a result, UE 401 can be configured for adding NR cells of SCG quickly”) Thus it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the cell identifier is an identifier of a candidate secondary cell group (SCG) cell for dual connectivity (DC) in the system of modified Li. The motivation is to improve system capacity (Tsai: see para 0003) Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAMIT KAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-5665. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NOEL BEHARRY can be reached at 5712705630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAMIT KAUR/Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 29, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Mar 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684592
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CHANNEL ACCESS PRIORITY DETERMINATION FOR SIDELINK TRANSMISSION
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684639
METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS COMMUNICATION USING A PLURALITY OF SUBSCRIBER IDENTITIES, A RELATED WIRELESS DEVICE AND A RELATED NETWORK NODE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12666327
SERVICE PACKET TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666482
RECONFIGURING LINK CHARACTERISTICS WHILE MAINTAINING LINKS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660035
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIDELINK DRX ALIGNMENT
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.0%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month