Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/920,588

AFMT ANALOGS AND THEIR USE IN METHODS OF TREATING PARKINSON'S DISEASE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 21, 2022
Examiner
WILSON, JERICA KATLYNN
Art Unit
1621
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
President and Fellows of Harvard College
OA Round
2 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
57 granted / 94 resolved
+0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
133
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
34.4%
-5.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 94 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
enNotice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-5, 7-16 and 65-67 are pending in the instant application. Claims 1, 4, 8, and 10-16 have been amended. Claims 6 and 33-36 have been cancelled. Claims 65-67 are new. Claims 3, 9, 14-16, and 65-67 are withdrawn from consideration. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, and 10-13 are examined herein. Priority The instant application claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/013270, filed on 21 April 2020 and PCT/US2021/028492, filed on 21 April 2021. The claims to the benefit of priority are acknowledged. As such, the effective filing date of the claims is 21 April 2020. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS), submitted on 12 August 2025, 20 August 2025, and 12 December 2025 are acknowledged and considered. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Response to Arguments The amendment filed on 12 December 2025 has been entered. In view of applicant amendment to claim 1, the Improper Markush rejection of record is withdrawn. Applicant has limited claimed genus to be representative of the disclosed embodiments. In view of applicant amendment to claim 1, the 102(a)(1) rejection of record over DeJesus is withdrawn. Applicant has added the proviso that the compound is not the previously elected species; (2S)-2-amino-2-[(3-fluoranyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl] -3-fluoropropanoic acid. In addition, new 1020(a)(1) rejections are necessitated by amendment (see below). All rejections and objections not found below have been withdrawn. Election/Restrictions Applicant has amended the claims such that the previously elected species, (2S)-2-amino-2-[(3-fluoranyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl] -3-fluoropropanoic acid, is no longer a claimed compound. As such, the search has been expanded to the next compound listed in claim 13; 2-amino-3-(3-fluoro-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid. NEW REJECTIONS FACILITATED BY AMENDMENT Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, and 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ciba Geigy (BE 636257) (hereinafter referred to as “Ciba”). Regarding claims 1 and 13, Ciba discloses compounds of the formula pictured below (claim 22), which is a species of the instant genus when the reference R and R’ are hydrogen. This corresponds to the instant Formula (I) where: X1 is -C(R7)=, wherein R7 is halogen X2 is -C(R11)=, wherein R11 is hydrogen X3 is -C(R8)=, wherein R8 is hydrogen X4 is =C(R12)-, wherein R12 is hydrogen X5 is =C(R4), wherein R4 is hydroxyl R1 is hydrogen R2 is hydrogen R3 is PNG media_image1.png 90 104 media_image1.png Greyscale ; wherein R9 is hydrogen; R10 is amino; and R14 is hydrogen PNG media_image2.png 116 242 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 92 172 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Ciba discloses the substituent corresponding to the instant R14 is H (claim 22). Regarding claim 4, Ciba discloses the substituent corresponding to the instant R4 is hydroxyl and the substituent corresponding to the instant R10 is amino (claim 22). Regarding claim 5, Ciba discloses a compound of claim 1 that is not one of the three excluded compounds of claim 5. Regarding claim 7, Ciba teaches the racemic form which would include the S isomer of claim 7. Regarding claim 8, Ciba discloses the substituents corresponding to X1, X2, X3, and X4 are CR7, CR11, CR8, and CR12, respectively (claim 22). Regarding claim 10, Ciba discloses the substituent corresponding to the instant R4 is hydroxyl (claim 22). Regarding claim 11, Ciba discloses the substituent corresponding to the instant R1 is H (claim 22). Regarding claim 12, Ciba discloses the substituent corresponding to the instant R7 is halogen (claim 22). Conclusion Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, and 10-13 are rejected. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jerica K Wilson whose telephone number is (703)756-4690. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton Brooks can be reached at (571)270-7682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.K.W./Examiner, Art Unit 1621 /CLINTON A BROOKS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 12, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582722
BIFUNCTIONAL COMPOUNDS FOR DEGRADING BTK VIA UBIQUITIN PROTEOSOME PATHWAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12533357
TREATMENT FOR ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA OR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12527788
Defining RNA-Small Molecule Affinity Landscapes Enables Design of a Small Molecule Inhibitor...
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12527759
COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING AMINO ACIDS FOR USE AND TREATMENT OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INJURIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12503484
Androstane Derivatives with Activity as Pure or Predominantly Pure Stimulators of SERCA2a for the Treatment of Heart Failure.
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.5%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 94 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month