Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/920,777

AEROSOL GENERATION APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 21, 2022
Priority
Apr 22, 2020 — CN 202010323376.1 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, PHU HOANG
Art Unit
1747
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shenzhen First Union Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
469 granted / 712 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/30/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-9 and 14-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu et al. (CN 106102493) in view of Chen et al. (WO 2020034774A1) Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses a control method for an aerosol generation apparatus, wherein the method is applied to the aerosol generation apparatus, the aerosol generation apparatus comprises a heater for heating an aerosol generation substrate to generate an aerosol, and the method comprises: detecting whether a user smokes according to a real-time voltage value and a preset voltage threshold of the heater (Abstract and claim 1); and calculating a smoking duration when the real-time voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold when a detected result that the user smokes is detected (Abstract and claim 1). Liu discloses calculating the energy accumulated consumption of the heating wire, and accumulated consumption of the heating wire reaches the preset energy control power supply to stops supplying power to the heating wire wherein accumulated consumption of the heating wire comprises detecting a heating wire on the real-time voltage and real-time resistor; making use of the real-time power versus time obtained by integrating the accumulated consumption of energy (Abstract and Summary of the Invention). Liu further discloses a time interval (preset time such as 60s) between user sucking the Nth cigarette and the N+1 cigarette to distinguishes smoking process. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have the preset in accumulated consumption time (instead of preset in accumulated energy consumption since they are directly related) to stop heating of one smoking process when the smoking duration is greater than or equal to a preset duration threshold. Liu does not expressly disclose calculating a duration when the user does not smoke. Chen discloses when the duration of inspiration action is not detected to reach a threshold value, the device is triggered to enter a standby state; when in the standby state, the power consumption of the device reduce (see document). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to calculate a duration when the user does not smoke; and controlling a temperature of the heater to be reduced from a preset temperature in the smoking phase to a first preset temperature if the duration when the user does not smoke is greater than or equal to a second preset duration threshold as taught by Chen to save the power of the device. Regarding claim 2, Liu suggests wherein the detecting whether the user smokes according to a real-time voltage value and a preset voltage threshold of the heater comprises: if the real-time voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold, determining that the user smokes, and otherwise, determining that the user does not smoke ( claim 1). Regarding claim 3, Liu suggests the detecting whether the user smokes according to a real-time voltage value and a preset voltage threshold of the heater comprises: calculating an average voltage value in a preset time period according to the real-time voltage value; and if the average voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold, determining that the user smokes, and otherwise, determining that the user does not smoke (claim 1). Regarding claim 4, Liu discloses calculating the sum of all smoking duration when the user smokes according to the smoking duration when the real-time voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold; and if the sum of all the smoking duration is close to a first preset duration threshold, or the sum of all the smoking duration is greater than or equal to the first preset duration threshold, controlling the heater to stop heating (Abstract and claim 1). Regarding claim 5, since the accumulation of energy consumption and the working period of time of the heating element are related (claim 1); it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made the a preset energy is directly related to a duration threshold and therefore would have perform routine experimentation to arrive to the claimed range. Regarding claim 6, Liu discloses after controlling the heater to enter a smoking phase, executing the step of detecting whether a user smokes according to a real-time voltage value and a preset voltage threshold of the heater (claim 1). Regarding claim 8, Liu discloses the duration when the user does not smoke is determined according to the duration when the real-time voltage value is less than the preset voltage threshold (claim 1). Regarding claim 9, Liu discloses controlling the temperature of the heater to rise from the first preset temperature to a second preset temperature when it is detected that the user smokes, wherein the second preset temperature is greater than the preset target temperature (Abstract and claim 1). Regarding claim 14, Liu discloses a method further comprising calculating the sum of all smoking duration when the user smokes according to the smoking duration when the real-time voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold; and if the sum of all the smoking duration is close to a first preset duration threshold, or the sum of all the smoking duration is greater than or equal to the first preset duration threshold, controlling the heater to stop heating (Abstract and claim 1). Regarding claim 15, since the accumulation of energy consumption and the working period of time of the heating element are related (claim 1); it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made the a preset energy is directly related to a duration threshold and therefore would have perform routine experimentation to arrive to the claimed range. Regarding claim 16, Liu discloses calculating the sum of all smoking duration when the user smokes according to the smoking duration when the real-time voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold; and if the sum of all the smoking duration is close to a first preset duration threshold, or the sum of all the smoking duration is greater than or equal to the first preset duration threshold, controlling the heater to stop heating (Abstract and claim 1). Regarding claim 17, since the accumulation of energy consumption and the working period of time of the heating element are related (claim 1); it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made the a preset energy is directly related to a duration threshold and therefore would have perform routine experimentation to arrive to the claimed range. Regarding claim 18, Liu discloses controlling the temperature of the heater to rise from the first preset temperature to a second preset temperature when it is detected that the user smokes, wherein the second preset temperature is greater than the preset target temperature (claim 1). Regarding claim 19, Liu discloses a control method for an aerosol generation apparatus, wherein the method is capable of being applied to the aerosol generation apparatus, the aerosol generation apparatus comprises a heater for heating an aerosol generation substrate to generate an aerosol, and the method comprises: detecting whether a user smokes according to a real-time voltage value and a preset voltage threshold of the heater; calculating a smoking duration when the real-time voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold when a detected result that the user smokes is detected (Abstract and claim 1); wherein the step of detecting whether a user smokes according to a real-time voltage value and a preset voltage threshold of the heater (Abstract and claim 1). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to use an average voltage value in a preset time period according to the real-time voltage value; and determining that the user smokes if the average voltage value is greater than or equal to the preset voltage threshold, and determining that the user does not smoke if otherwise. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 9/04/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments filed 3/30/2026 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHU H NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-5931. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael H Wilson can be reached at 5712703882. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHU H NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 1747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Mar 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733679
AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727615
COMBUSTIBLE HEAT SOURCE FOR SMOKING ARTICLE AND SMOKING ARTICLE COMPRISING SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714149
SUSCEPTOR FOR VAPOR GENERATION APPARATUS, VAPOR GENERATION APPARATUS, AND TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12690606
TOBACCO-CONTAINING SMOKING ARTICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12677868
SMOKING ARTICLE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+19.7%)
3y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month