Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/920,977

POLYANIONIC SURFACTANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THEREOF

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Oct 24, 2022
Examiner
LI, AIQUN
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Chevron U S A Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
523 granted / 822 resolved
-1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
865
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 822 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 8, 9, 19, 22 and 28--30 are pending as amended on 4 February 2026, claims 5, 6, 10, 11 and 15 are withdrawn from consideration. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Applicant’s amendments to the claims and the remarks/arguments have been entered and fully considered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 4 February 2026 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.97(c) because it lacks the timing fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(p). It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. Response to Amendment and Arguments Applicant’s amendment does not distinguishes from US Patent 5922663 (Gabriel). Applicant’s arguments in light of the amendments have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Gabriel does not teach the presence of a butyleneoxy group in the formula. The examiner disagrees. Gabriel teaches in the following formula I: PNG media_image1.png 156 156 media_image1.png Greyscale A is independently a straight chain or branched C1-C6 alkyl (col.17, line 7-20), and R2 can be a polyether group [-O(EO)a(PO)b-] (col. 16, line 50-59), which renders the presence of a butyleneoxy group obvious when A is a ethylene, R and R1 are each C1 alkyl (methyl), or when A is a methylene and one of R and R1 is C1 alkyl, and the other one is a C2 alkyl. As such the rejection over Gabriel stands. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 8 require z is 0, however, independent claim 1 requires z is 1 to 40. Thus claim 8 fails to include all the limitations of claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1, 8-9 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent 5922663 (Gabriel). Regarding claims 1 and 8-9, Gabriel teaches an anionic surfactant of the formula (col.16, line 35-40): PNG media_image1.png 156 156 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the R and R1 are independently C1-C22 alkyl (col.16,line 45 and 56); R2 can be a polyether group [-O(EO)a(PO)b-] wherein a is 0-30, b is 0 to 10, a+b is at least 1 and t is independently 0 or 1(col. 16, line 50-59), which overlaps with the claimed x and y, respectively and a prima facie case of obviousness exists; A is independently a straight chain or branched C1-C6 alkylene(col.17, line 7-20); R3 can be a phenyl group (col. 17,line 20-23); and Z is independently -SO3Y or -OSO3Y (col16, line 65-67), which renders the claimed C7-C28 alkylaryl group substituted with one sulfonate moieties and the instant Formula IA containing 1 butyleneoxy group obvious, i.e., z is 1, when A is a ethylene, R and R1 are each C1 alkyl (methyl), or when A is a methylene and one of R and R1 is C1 alkyl, and the other one is a C2 alkyl. Regarding claim 19 , Gabriel teaches a composition comprising the surfactant and water as a carrier liquid (col. 29 ,line 1-5). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 22 and 28-30 are allowable for reasons of record. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AIQUN LI whose telephone number is (571)270-7736. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am -4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-2721302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AIQUN LI/Ph.D., Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jun 30, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Oct 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600894
LIGNIN-BASED DRILLING FLUIDS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597596
NANO-SILICON-GRAPHITE COMPOSITE NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL WITH CARBON COATING AND ALUMINUM METAPHOSPHATE COMPOSITE MODIFICATION LAYER ON SURFACE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592654
MOISTURE ENABLED ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION MATERIALS AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577451
POLYANIONIC SURFACTANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576430
Method of Pretreating a Pipeline or Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+22.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month