Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/923,092

HOSE, HOSE ARRANGEMENT AND CORRESPONDING PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A HOSE ARRANGEMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 03, 2022
Examiner
BOCHNA, DAVID
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Neoperl GmbH
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
1438 granted / 1801 resolved
+27.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1849
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1801 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 7-8 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 3, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim 7, line 3 recites “a hose (1) and inner hose (2) as claimed in claim 1”. It is suggested changing the phrase to “the hose (1) and the inner hose (2) as claimed in claim 1”, as those elements were already recited in claim 1. Claim 8 depends from itself. Additionally, claim 8 also again recites “an inner hose (2)”, which was already recited in claims 1 and 7. Claim 11, it is unclear how widening of the inner diameter of the hose, using a mandrel, can occur “during the plugging in of the hose nipple”, as the mandrel and the nipple would be occupying the same space in the inner diameter of the hose. Clarification is needed. Claim 14, it is unclear what is meant by the phrase “or outer diameters D of less than 10mm, less than 9 mm, and less than 7mm”. It is unclear if this is comparing the outer diameter of one hose relative to the other or if both variants must have outer diameters of less than 10 mm, less than 9 mm, and less than 7mm. However, if both variants have, for example, an outer diameter D of 5 mm, they would anticipate this limitation of the claim, but fail to be variants, as they would have the same outer diameter. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 4-6, 9-10 and 16 are allowed. Claims 3, 7-8 and 11-14 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 3, 7-8 and 11-14 have been considered but are moot because the new rejections do not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E. BOCHNA whose telephone number is (571)272-7078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID BOCHNA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 03, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 14, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 07, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601444
THERMALLY INSULATED PIPE SYSTEM, THERMALLY INSULATING PIPE SECTION AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A THERMALLY INSULATING PIPE SECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601430
SHOWER COLUMN ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601226
TUBULAR MEMBER WITH ASYMMETRIC BURST AND COLLAPSE RATINGS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601428
METER SWIVEL NUT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584570
MULTILAYER TUBULAR MOLDED BODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING MULTILAYER TUBULAR MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month