Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 17/923,315

ACTIVATION AND DETECTION SYSTEM FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL DEVICE ATTACHED TO A MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 08, 2022
Priority
Jul 06, 2020 — EU 20184146.7 +1 more
Examiner
WOLCOTT, BRIAN P
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shl Medical AG
OA Round
4 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
454 granted / 586 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
619
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 586 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Status Claims 15, 17-27 and 29-34 are pending. Claims 1-15, 16 and 28 are cancelled. Claims 15 and 29 are amended. Response to Arguments Regarding amended claims 15 and 29, Applicant further requires "wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover", which was originally in claim 16, now cancelled. The added limitation does not appear to overcome the current 102 rejection to Yang. Yang teaches an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover, since, as shown in Fig 10, which depicts a portion of the cap removal sequence, and described in P[0103], the cap is moved relative to the needle shield remover to activate the supplemental device. In this initial activation sequence, the needle shield remover is not moved. As described in P[0103], the spring lever is rotated to engage switch 41, which activates the supplemental device. As shown in Fig 10, the cap is still coupled to the housing. When the cap is decoupled/removed from the housing during a cap removal sequence, the needle shield remover is then moved along with the cap as described in P[0101]. As such, Yang teaches " wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover". Examiner notes the limitation “wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover” is a functional limitation that describes what the does, rather than what the device is. In short, the claimed invention does not differ from the prior art in any physical structural manner. It has been held that “While features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431-32 (Fed. Cir. 1997); MPEP 2114 Additionally the limitations “that makes it compatible with standard tees having different ball resting diameters” are construed to be functional language not structurally distinguishable over the prior art because the limitation indicates a manner of operating the device or an intended result. Furthermore, a claim containing a "recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus" if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 15, 17-27 and 29-34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yang et al. (US 20180318526), hereinafter: “Yang”. In Regard to Claim 15 Yang teaches: A medicament delivery system comprising: a drug delivery device(10) comprising a medicament container(112; P[0078]) positioned within a housing(11; P[0078]), a dose delivery outlet(distal end 118 of needle; P[0049]-P[0050]) accessible through a terminal end of the housing(P[0049]) and a needle shield(122, 30) acting as a sterile barrier(P[0080]-P[0081]), coupled to a needle shield remover(18; Fig 9A; 122,30 is inherently coupled to the needle shield remover 18; P[0080]-P[0081]); a supplemental device(33) comprising a battery module(35, power supply is a battery, P[0063]), an activation member(40) and a communication module(152); a movable cap(30) coupled to the needle shield remover(Fig 8-10; P[0101]) wherein a cap movement(cap coupling/removal sequence illustrated in Fig 9A-10) creates a gap(see annotated fig below) between the cap and the housing of the medicament delivery device, wherein the creation of the gap creates a space(see annotated figure below) for the activation member to enter after passing a proximal end of the housing(activation member 40 enters the gap/space during the cap removal sequence; see annotated figure below) of the medicament delivery device as the activation member moves in a proximal direction(see annotated figure below), and wherein the activation member entering the space triggers the supplemental device (visually apparent from Fig 10, the activation member 40 enters the space and triggers (activates) the supplemental device by engaging the switch 41; P[0097]-P[0103]); and wherein the activation member is attached to the movable cap(the activation member 40 which includes spring lever 42 having a rotatable coupling 47 that engages an extension 36 of the cap assembly 30. See Col 19, In. 55 to Col 20 In. 17), and wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover(Fig 9A-11B; the arrows indicate the cap being movable in the axial direction, and as described at P[0089-P[0104] the cap can be moved axially between a 1st, 2nd and 3rd positions, wherein when the cap is moved to the 3rd position, represented by Fig 10, an initial motion sequence of the cap moving in the axial direction activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover 18; and as shown in Fig 10, which depicts a portion of the cap removal sequence, the cap is moved relative to the needle shield remover to activate the supplemental device. In this initial activation sequence, the needle shield remover is not moved. As described in P[0103], the spring lever is rotated to engage switch 41, which activates the supplemental device. As shown in Fig 10, the cap is still coupled to the housing, thus the needle shield remover is not moved). wherein the supplemental device is configured to determine if the cap has moved relative to the needle shield(P[0100]-P[0105]) and wherein the communication module is configured to transmit data to an external device where the data comprises information directly related to the status of the activation member and/or the movement of the movable cap(communication module 152 transmits “data representative of at least one of a condition and an operational state of the drug delivery device”, i.e. the data comprises information directly related to the activation status of 40 and/or the position of the removable cap; P[0062], P[0065], P[0079]). Examiner notes the limitation “wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover” is a functional limitation that describes what the does, rather than what the device is. In short, the claimed invention does not differ from the prior art in any physical structural manner. It has been held that “While features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431-32 (Fed. Cir. 1997); MPEP 2114 Additionally the limitations “that makes it compatible with standard tees having different ball resting diameters” are construed to be functional language not structurally distinguishable over the prior art because the limitation indicates a manner of operating the device or an intended result. Furthermore, a claim containing a "recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus" if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987). PNG media_image1.png 334 592 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 368 624 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 354 576 media_image3.png Greyscale In Regard to Claim 17 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the dose delivery outlet is prevented from being accessible unless the cap is fully removed from the medicament delivery device(the dose delivery outlet is shielded unless the cap is fully removed from the drug delivery device), wherein a continued moving sequence of the cap subsequently to the initial moving sequence of the cap is required to remove of needle shield from the dose delivery outlet(as described in P[0101], the needle shield remover 18 is removed from the device 10 with a continued moving sequence of the cap 30 to ready the device for administering the drug, as such the needle shield remover also removes the needle shield from the dose delivery outlet simultaneously during the continued moving sequence; P[0080]). In Regard to Claim 18 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the battery module or the communication module comprises one or more sensors(164) configured to detect a motion of at least one of the components of the medicament delivery device(P[0062], P[0079]). In Regard to Claim 19 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the system further comprises a sensor module(160,162,164,165) connectable to any other module(controller module 150, communication module 152) and wherein said sensor module comprises one or more sensors configured to detect a motion of at least one of the components of the medicament delivery device(P[0062]-P[0071]). In Regard to Claim 20 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the activation member is a switch(40 is a switch; P[0079]). In Regard to Claim 21 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 20(see rejection of claim 20 above), wherein the switch is initially in a first state(deactivated/first position; P[0041], P[0096]) where the communication module is prevented to receive power from the battery(P[0096]) and where movement of the cap relative to the proximal end of the medicament delivery device changes the switch to a second state(activated/third position; P[0041], P[0096]) where the battery provides power to the communication module(P[0096]). In Regard to Claim 22 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 21(see rejection of claim 21 above), wherein the activation member is configured to activate the supplemental device only once(the switch 40 activates the supplemental device only once during the cap removal sequence; P[0041], P[0096]), and wherein the switch being in the second state, indicates a potential breach of the sterile barrier of the medicament delivery device(the switch being in being in the second state, or activated state indicates the sterile barrier has been removed along with the cap). In Regard to Claim 23 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 23(see rejection of claim 23 above), wherein the supplemental device comprises a recorder(172; P[0079]) configured to obtain and store data information about the medicament delivery device(P[0063]-P[0064]). In Regard to Claim 24 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the data transmission by the communication module starts when the recorder receives power from the battery(data transmission by communication module 152 starts when the battery 35 provides power to the electronic component 33 which includes the recorder 172; P[0079]). In Regard to Claim 25 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein any of the modules is removable from the housing and is reusable(each of the battery module and the communication module are contained within the cap and are thus removable from the housing and reusable; P[0071]). In Regard to Claim 26 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the system further comprises a logging module(172) connectable to any other module or included as part of any other module(172 is connected to the battery module which provided its power and may be included as part of any other module; P[0079]), and wherein the logging module is configured to start tracking motion of the medicament delivery device when the cap is removed(motion tracking by the logging module 172 starts when the battery 35 provides power to the electronic component 33 which includes the recorder 172; P[0079]). In Regard to Claim 27 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 15(see rejection of claim 15 above), wherein the system further comprises a memory module(172) connectable to any other module or included as part of any other module(172 is connected to the battery module which provided its power and may be included as part of any other module; P[0079]), and wherein the memory module is configured to store the data(P[0063]-P[0064]) and the communication module is configured to transmit the data wirelessly to the external device(P[0065]). In Regard to Claim 29 Yang teaches: A medicament delivery system comprising: a medicament delivery device(10) having a medicament container(112; P[0078]) positioned within a housing(11; P[0078]), a dose delivery outlet(distal end 118 of needle; P[0049]-P[0050]) accessible through a terminal end of the housing(P[0049]) and a needle shield(122,30) surrounding the dose delivery outlet to provide a sterile barrier(P[0080]-P[0081]), where the needle shield is operatively associated with a needle shield remover(18; Fig 9A; 122,30 is inherently coupled to the needle shield remover 18; P[0080]-P[0081]); a supplemental device(33) comprising a battery module(35, power supply is a battery, P[0063]), an activation member(40) and a communication module(152); and a removable cap(30) is operatively associated with the needle shield remover (Fig 8-10; P[0101]), where an initial movement of the cap creates a gap(see annotated fig above) between the cap and the housing of the medicament delivery device, wherein the creation of the gap creates a space(see annotated figure above) for the activation member to enter after passing a proximal end of the housing(activation member 40 enters the gap/space during the cap removal sequence; see annotated figure above) of the medicament delivery device as the activation member moves in a proximal direction(see annotated figure above), and wherein the activation member entering the space causes the activation member to activate the supplemental device(see annotated figures above; the cap being movable in the proximal direction, and as described at P[0089-P[0104] the cap can be moved axially between a 1st, 2nd and 3rd positions, wherein when the cap is moved to the 3rd position, represented by Fig 10, an initial motion sequence of the cap moving in the axial direction activates the supplemental device; this sequence is explicitly described in P[0103]) and where subsequent movement of the cap causes the needle shield to be removed from the dose delivery outlet(as described in P[0101], the needle shield remover 18 is removed from the device 10 with a continued moving sequence of the cap 30 to ready the device for administering the drug, as such the needle shield remover also removes the needle shield from the dose delivery outlet simultaneously during the continued moving sequence; P[0080]), wherein the supplemental device is configured to determine if the cap has moved relative to the needle shield(P[0100]-P[0105]), wherein the activation member is attached to the removable cap(the activation member 40 which includes spring lever 42 having a rotatable coupling 47 that engages an extension 36 of the cap assembly 30. See Col 19, In. 55 to Col 20 In. 17), wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover(Fig 9A-11B; the arrows indicate the cap being movable in the axial direction, and as described at P[0089-P[0104] the cap can be moved axially between a 1st, 2nd and 3rd positions, wherein when the cap is moved to the 3rd position, represented by Fig 10, an initial motion sequence of the cap moving in the axial direction activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover 18; and as shown in Fig 10, which depicts a portion of the cap removal sequence, the cap is moved relative to the needle shield remover to activate the supplemental device. In this initial activation sequence, the needle shield remover is not moved. As described in P[0103], the spring lever is rotated to engage switch 41, which activates the supplemental device. As shown in Fig 10, the cap is still coupled to the housing, thus the needle shield remover is not moved). wherein the supplemental device is configured to determine if the cap has moved relative to the needle shield(P[0100]-P[0105]) and wherein the communication module is configured to transmit data to an external device where the data comprises information directly related to the status of the activation member and/or the movement of the movable cap(communication module 152 transmits “data representative of at least one of a condition and an operational state of the drug delivery device”, i.e. the data comprises information directly related to the activation status of 40 and/or the position of the removable cap; P[0062], P[0065], P[0079]), and wherein the communication module is configured to transmit data to an external device where the data comprises information directly related to the status of the activation member or the movement of the removable cap(communication module 152 transmits “data representative of at least one of a condition and an operational state of the drug delivery device”, i.e. the data comprises information directly related to the activation status of 40 and/or the position of the removable cap; P[0062], P[0065], P[0079]). Examiner notes the limitation “wherein an initial motion sequence of the cap activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover” is a functional limitation that describes what the does, rather than what the device is. In short, the claimed invention does not differ from the prior art in any physical structural manner. It has been held that “While features of an apparatus may be recited either structurally or functionally, claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78, 44 USPQ2d 1429, 1431-32 (Fed. Cir. 1997); MPEP 2114 Additionally the limitations “that makes it compatible with standard tees having different ball resting diameters” are construed to be functional language not structurally distinguishable over the prior art because the limitation indicates a manner of operating the device or an intended result. Furthermore, a claim containing a "recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus" if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural limitations of the claim. Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987). In Regard to Claim 30 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 29(see rejection of claim 29 above), further comprising a sensor module(160,162,164,165) containing a sensor that detects a motion of the cap relative to the housing(P[0062]-P[0071]). In Regard to Claim 31 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 29(see rejection of claim 29 above), wherein the activation member comprises a switch(40 is a switch; P[0079]). In Regard to Claim 32 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 29(see rejection of claim 29 above), wherein the activation member comprises a switch(40 is a switch; P[0079]) that is initially in a first state(deactivated/first position; P[0041], P[0096]) that prevents a battery from energizing the communication module(P[0096]) and where movement of the cap relative to the terminal end of the housing moves the switch to a second state(activated/third position; P[0041], P[0096]) where the battery provides power to the communication module(P[0096]). In Regard to Claim 33 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 29(see rejection of claim 29 above), wherein the cap can move axially relative to the needle shield remover a first distance that will activate the activation member, where further axial movement of the cap will cause axial movement of the needle shield remover which in turn will cause axial movement of the needle shield relative to the dose delivery outlet(Fig 9A-11B; the arrows indicate the cap being movable in the proximal/axial direction, and as described at P[0089-P[0104] the cap can be moved axially between a 1st, 2nd and 3rd positions, wherein when the cap is moved to the 3rd position, represented by Fig 10, an initial motion sequence of the cap moving in the axial direction activates the supplemental device but does not move the needle shield remover 18; this sequence is explicitly described in P[0103}, and as described in P[0101], the needle shield remover 18 is removed from the device 10 with a continued moving sequence of the cap 30 to ready the device for administering the drug, as such the needle shield remover also removes the needle shield from the dose delivery outlet simultaneously during the continued moving sequence; P[0080]). In Regard to Claim 34 Yang teaches: The medicament delivery system of claim 29(see rejection of claim 29 above), wherein the supplemental device is removable from the medicament delivery device and is attachable to and reusable with a second medicament delivery device(each of the battery module and the communication module are contained within the cap and are thus removable from the housing and reusable with a second drug delivery device; P[0071]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN P WOLCOTT whose telephone number is (571)272-9837. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Weiss can be reached at 571-270-1775. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN P WOLCOTT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 04, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12694353
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR EVALUATION AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT OF WORKFLOWS INVOLVING HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680761
CONVECTIVE SUBSTRATE COOLING WITH MINIMAL PRESSURE CHANGE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680467
VARIABLE CAPACITY TURBOCHARGER
1y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12654823
MAST NAVIGATION LIGHT
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655773
LIGHT WEIGHT FAN CASING CONFIGURATIONS FOR ENERGY ABSORPTION
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.5%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 586 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month