Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/923,781

SIRP ALPHA AND SIRP BETA 1 ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 07, 2022
Priority
May 08, 2020 — provisional 63/022,309 +1 more
Examiner
BERHANE, SELAM
Art Unit
1675
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Electra Therapeutics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
48 granted / 81 resolved
-0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+57.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
139
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 81 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1, 3, 6, 16, 18-24, 26, 31-32, 34, 37-39, 44-45, 47, and 54 and species: SEQ ID NOs: 10, 26, 41, 58, 74, 91 109, 128, ADCC, SIRPα positive cells, macrophages, SEQ ID NO: 4 with amino acid substitutions, binding of antibody does not disrupt the interaction between CD47 and SIRPα, SEQ ID NO: 147 and 166 in the reply filed 01/14/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 55, 57, 60-67, 70-77, 79, 81-83 are withdrawn from consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions and species, there being no allowable generic or linking claims. Election was made in the reply filed 01/14/2026. Claims 1, 6, 16, 18-24, 26, 31-32, 34, 37-39, 44-45, 47, and 54 are now under consideration in the instant Office Action. Claim Objections Claims 1, 16, 18, and 20 are objected to because of the following informalities: the claims contain multiple periods within each claim. For example, "a.". Please change format to "a)". Applicant's attention is directed to MPEP 608.01(m) that deals with claim format. In particular, MPEP 608.01(m) discloses that each claim begins with a capital letter and ends with a period. In addition, it is disclosed that periods may not be used elsewhere in the claims except for abbreviations. See Fressola v. Manbeck, 36 USPQ2d 1211 (D.D.C. 1995). Where a claim sets forth a plurality of elements or steps, each element or step of the claim should be separated by a line indentation, 37 CFR 1.75(i). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 26 and 44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Instant claim 26 recites that the antibody can be an antibody fragment. It is unclear what type of antibody fragment this claim encompasses, as not all antibody fragment types require the presence of all six CDRs or heavy and light chain variable sequence as are required by the instant claims from which it depends. Instant claim 44 recites the term “optionally”. The phrase “optionally” is interpreted as "for example" which renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. For the purposes of examination, the instant claims will be interpreted without the optional limitations as they are not required or claimed as necessary to the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims that encompass SEQ ID NOs: 71, 74, 84, 105, 108, 109, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124, 127, 128, 138, 139, 140, 141 are free of the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SELAM BERHANE whose telephone number is (571)272-6138. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Stucker can be reached at 571-272-0911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SELAM BERHANE/Examiner, Art Unit 1675 /AURORA M FONTAINHAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673090
TREATMENT OF CANCERS USING sEphB4-HSA FUSION PROTEINS
4y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662541
ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AGAINST THE RECEPTOR TYROSINE KINASE EPHA5
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12637509
TRISPECIFIC ANTIBODY TARGETING BCMA, GPRC5D, AND CD3
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12559564
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PREVENTING OR REVERSING T-CELL EXHAUSTION THROUGH ECTONUCLEOTIDASE INHIBITION AND ANTIBODY-MEDIATED TARGET CYTOSIS
5y 2m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12540175
ANTI-APOE ANTIBODIES
1y 12m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+57.0%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 81 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month