Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/923,806

NETWORK LEVEL AUTO-HEALING BASED ON TROUBLESHOOTING/RESOLUTION METHOD OF PROCEDURES AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Priority
Sep 07, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTUS2022042705
Examiner
MCCARTHY, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
2113
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Rakuten Mobile Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
733 granted / 853 resolved
+30.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
876
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 853 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The amended independent claims recite “applying the first resolution to an electronic device configured to implement a node included in the network to resolve the error…”. The examiner cannot find any description of a device implementing a node then applying a resolution to change said node, as recited in claim 1. The examiner believes the applicant may have meant a different term than “node” as being implemented, such as an “action” as disclosed in the Specification in paragraph 0043. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S MCCARTHY whose telephone number is (571)272-3651. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bryce Bonzo can be reached at (571)272-3655. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S MCCARTHY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2113
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 08, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 15, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743355
MANAGEMENT OF TEST CASE CHAMPIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743330
KERNEL DUMP DISTRIBUTION ACROSS ELECTRONIC DEVICES
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737245
Memory Access Validation for Input/Output Operations Using an Interposer
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730732
MEMORY DEVICE HEALTH MONITORING LOGIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724657
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, FACTOR ANALYSIS METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (-4.7%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 853 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month