Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/924,724

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING AN INHALER ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 11, 2022
Priority
May 18, 2020 — EU 20175216.9 +1 more
Examiner
EFTA, ALEX B
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Philip Morris International Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
459 granted / 767 resolved
-5.2% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
813
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
57.8%
+17.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 767 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/28/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Amendment filed 7/28/2026 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 1-9 and 12-14 are pending. Claims 1-5 are withdrawn. Claims 10 and 11 are cancelled. Claim is amended. No new matter is added. Support for the first folding head is found in instant published paragraph [0071]-[0074], support for the second folding head is found in instant published paragraphs [0095]-[0096]) and support for the pre-folding station and end folding station being located one after another is found in instant published paragraphs [0135] and [0136] as well as in figure 2. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see REMARKS, filed 7/28/2026, with respect to claim 6 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The prior rejections of the claims has been withdrawn. Applicant argues that the cited art does not teach or suggest the two claimed folding heads, having their respective surfaces. Examiner agrees. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-9, 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 requires that the folding station fold the pre-treated portion inwards by “at least 90 degrees”. Then requires two sub folding stations in said folding station. The first one deforms the end of the pre-treated portion by less than 90 degrees. The second deforms the pre-treated portion by “about 90 degrees’ or “larger than 90 degrees”. There is a conflict in the scope of the inwards degree between the second folding station and the “at least 90 degrees. The “at least 90 degrees” includes 90 degrees. Whereas, the “about 90 degrees” includes values slightly less than 90 degrees (MPEP 2144.05, I) and “larger than 90 degrees” necessarily includes values greater than 90 degrees. Thus, the second folding station includes angles that aren’t 90 degrees, which is within the scope of “at least 90 degrees. Claims 7-9 and 12-14 are rejected for depending from claim 6. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. HOLDERMAN et al. discloses an ignitable device having plant matter therein (Paragraph [0106]) comprising a body, 603, (Paragraph [0096]) a cavity holding a liquid therein, 1124, (Paragraph [0103]); a mouthpiece element, 1101 (Paragraph [0103]) and a deformable tubular element having an open distal end (Paragraphs [0103]-[0105]; See item 1123 in figures 6P and 6O). The deformable end is placed into a folding element (e.g., device for manufacturing an inhaler article) causing the end to form folds, 1130, in the form of crimps (e.g., pre-treating the distal end to reduce structural stability) and then continuing to fold the end past 90 degrees and into the plant matter by means of a concavely shaped folding head (See figures 6L, 6N) (Paragraphs [0103]-[0106]). As seen in figures 6D-6F, and paragraph [0101] of HOLDERMAN et al., the tip of the deformable tubular element goes from a pre-folded end, to an end that is folded into an end with a convex shape, and then ultimately to a concave shaped end, and thus implicitly past 90 degrees into the plant matter. [AltContent: textbox (Starting of fold forms obtuse angle)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 450 290 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (Final fold forms acute angle)][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image2.png 540 416 media_image2.png Greyscale The folding tip, 670, is an equivalent pre-treatment station in that it is a crimping head for reducing structural stability. However, HOLDERMAN et al. only discloses a single folding head, 604, and not two as required by claim 6. ROBINSON (US 0662027) describes the crimping, folding and tucking of the end of a cigarette (Figures 1 and 2; Page 1, lines 55-75) by using respective heads. However, the shape of the heads isn’t disclosed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX B EFTA whose telephone number is (313)446-6548. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Philip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX B EFTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 11, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 23, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733672
CIGARETTE ADDITIVE, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726000
BONDING DEVICE AND BONDING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714805
BEVERAGE AND VAPOR DISPENSER
6y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714146
AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE AND HEATER
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12686639
CERAMIC, VAPORIZATION CORE, AND VAPORIZER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.3%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 767 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month