Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/925,388

CONVEYING APPARATUS AND TONING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 15, 2022
Examiner
NEJAD, MAHDI H
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Zhengzhou Sanhua Technology Industry Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
442 granted / 602 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 602 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of the Group 1 (claims 1-7) directed to a conveyor in the reply filed on 10/02/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 8-13 (Group 2) are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected species. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on Chinese Application CN202010664389.5 dated 05/20/2021 and applicant has filed a certified copy of this Chinese application on 11/15/2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Hartness (US 7055677 B2). Regarding claim 1, Hartness teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below) a conveying apparatus (conveyor 1110), wherein the conveying apparatus comprises: a first guide rail (col. 20, line 64-col. 1, line 11: guide rail 1185), comprising a first section and a second section connected to each other; a compression module (compression module comprises at least flexible adaptors 1192, gripping members 1132 and body 1130), which can be provided on the first guide rail (best shown in Fig. 44) in a manner of being movably fitted along the first guide rail (col. 20, line 64-col. 1, line 11), wherein the compression module comprises a base (body 1130) and a compression assembly (adaptors 1192, gripping members 1132) with adjustable relative positions (adjustable relative vertical positions Z), the compression assembly is provided on the base, the compression assembly and the base have a gap therebetween, the compression module has a to-be-assembled state and a compression state which are oppositely arranged, and when the compression module is in the compression state, the gap is decreased so as to clamp a clamped member (as shown in Fig. 44, in the compression state, with cylindrical clamped member being clamped, the gap between the compression assembly (1132, 1192) and the base (1130) is z1; this gap z1 is increased to z2 in a to-be-assembled state when the jaws of the compression assembly (1132, 1192) are opened to release the cylindrical clamped member); and a limiting structure (limiting structure comprises right side 1152, 1188 and left side 1152, 1184), configured to adjust the gap between the compression assembly and the base (movement of 1152 on angled surface of 1188 and 1184 opens and closes jaws of the compression assembly and therefore changes gap between the compression assembly (1132, 1192) and the base), in a process that the compression module moves from the first section to the second section (first section of the first guide rail (1185, 1187) is wider than second section; therefore movement of the compression module on the guide rail from the first section to the second section closes the jaws of the compression assembly (1132, 1192) and therefore changes the gap between the compression assembly and the base 1130), a state of the compression module is switched through the limiting structure, and when the compression module is located at the first section, the compression module is in the to-be-assembled state (depending on the size of the cylindrical clamped part, movement of the compression module in the first section in -Y direction shown below gradually opens the jaws of the compression assembly (1192, 1132) and releases the clamped member and makes the compression module ready to grip another object), and when the compression module is located at the second section, the compression module is in the compression state (depending on the size of the cylindrical clamped part, movement of the compression module in the second section in +Y direction shown below gradually closes the jaws of the compression assembly (1192, 1132) and clamps the clamped member). PNG media_image1.png 1208 779 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The closest prior art to the claimed invention of claim 2 are Hartness and Marti (ES 2224786 A1). Hartness teaches the limiting structure comprises a second guide rail (1188, 1184) and a limiting member (1152), the first guide rail and the second guide rail are provided in the same direction (Y direction). However Hartness does not teach the second guide rail is provided with a first sliding groove, the limiting member is provided in the first sliding groove (in conveying apparatus of Hartness the second guide rail 1184 and limiting member 1152 are cam mechanisms to push the jaws and not a ramped groove), the base is provided on the first guide rail, and the limiting member is connected to the compression assembly. Marti teaches (reproduced and annotated Figs. below) a bottle gripping conveying apparatus with movement of the limiting member 62 on ramped second guide rail 63 rotates gear 61 and therefore moves racks 54, 54 to open and close the jaws 4, 4. However Marti does not teach gap between the compression assembly (4, 4) and the base (top surface of 2) changes. PNG media_image2.png 827 960 media_image2.png Greyscale Claims 3-7 would be allowable due to dependency on allowable claim 2. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHDI H NEJAD whose telephone number is (571)270-0464. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at (313) 446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MAHDI H. NEJAD Examiner Art Unit 3723 /MAHDI H NEJAD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589508
ROBOT HAND, ROBOT, ROBOT SYSTEM, AND TRANSFER METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589468
ELECTRIC VISE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589469
LEVELING KNOB SYSTEM AND MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583063
PRESS PLATE MODULE, PRODUCTION LINE, AND CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575378
WAFER HANDLING DEVICE AND SUCKER MODULE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.9%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 602 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month