Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/926,264

LATEX COMPOSITION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 18, 2022
Examiner
NERANGIS, VICKEY M
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sumitomo Seika Chemicals Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allow Rate
649 granted / 1152 resolved
-8.7% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
69 currently pending
Career history
1221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1152 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/10/2025 has been entered (with RCE filed on 1/8/2026). Response to Amendment The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior office action. All outstanding rejections, except for those maintained below, are withdrawn in light of applicant’s amendment filed on 12/10/2025 (entered with RCE filed on 1/8/2026). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1, 8, 12, and 24-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hironaka (JP 2009-114413, machine translation) in view of Bowers (US 2,968,637) and Martz (US 5,319,032). With respect to claims 1, 12, 24, and 25, Hironaka discloses an aqueous modified chlorosulfonated polyolefin (paragraph 0001) composition comprising chlorosulfonated polyethylene (paragraph 0015) and optionally known additives including a vulcanization accelerator and film-forming aids (paragraph 0036) such as ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (i.e., methyl glycol), diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (i.e., methyl diglycol), ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (i.e., butyl glycol), and dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether (i.e., butyl propylene diglycol) (paragraph 0037) which also read on claimed formula I for n = 1. Hironaka fails to disclose (i) the amount of vulcanization accelerator or a specific vulcanization accelerator compound or (ii) the amount of film forming aid. With respect to (i), Bowers discloses curable dispersions of ethylene polymers, e.g., a dispersion (i.e., latex) comprising 100 parts by weight chlorosulfonated polyethylene, 1 part by weight diphenylguanidine (accelerator), and 3 parts by weight benzothiazyl disulfide (accelerator) (col. 5, lines 5-15). Given that both Hironaka and Bowers discloses aqueous dispersion of chlorosulfonated polyolefin comprising accelerator and further given that Bowers teaches that suitable vulcanization accelerators for chlorosulfonated polyolefin includes diphenylguanidine (guanidine based) and benzothiazyl disulfide (thiazole-based), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize at least one of these accelerators in Hironaka’s aqueous dispersion in an amount of 1-3 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of chlorosulfonated polyolefin. With respect to (ii), Martz discloses modified chlorinated polyolefins (abstract) and teaches that suitable coalescing solvents (i.e., film forming aids) include ethylene glycol butyl ether (i.e., butyl glycol) inter alia and are used in amounts of 5-40 wt % (preferably 15-30 wt %) based on the solids of the aqueous dispersion (i.e., latex solids) (col. 3, lines 42-58). Given that Martz discloses glycol ethers as film forming aids and further given that Martz teaches that chlorinated polyolefin latex appropriately includes 5-40 wt % glycol ether solvents as a film forming aid, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the glycol ether film forming aids of Hironaka within the claimed range. With respect to claim 8, Hironaka discloses film-forming aids (paragraph 0036) such as ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (i.e., methyl glycol), diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (i.e., methyl diglycol), ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (i.e., butyl glycol), and dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether (i.e., butyl propylene diglycol) (paragraph 0037). While Hironaka teaches butyl glycol it does not teach claimed isobutyl glycol. Even so, it is the examiner’s position that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to expect similar beneficial results with isomers. Case law holds that position isomers are generally of sufficiently close structural similarity that there is a presumed expectation that such compounds possess similar properties. In re Wilder, 563 F.2d 457, 195 USPQ 426 (CCPA 1977). Also, while Hironaka teaches butyl glycol it does not teach hexyl glycol. It is the examiner’s position that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to expect similar beneficial results with compounds having only additional –CH2– groups (from 4 to 6 for hexyl). Case laws holds that homologs (compounds differing regularly by the successive addition of the same chemical group, e.g,. by –CH2– groups) are generally of sufficiently close structural similarity that there is a presumed expectation that such compounds possess similar properties. In re Wilder, 563 F.2d 457, 195 USPQ 426 (CCPA 1977). Evidence to support the examiner’s position is found in Martz which teaches that ethylene glycol hexyl ether (hexyl glycol) is preferred (col. 3, line 54). With respect to claims 26-30, Hironaka teaches that chlorosulfonated polyolefins are used in packings, gaskets, and handrails inter alia, which are all molded products. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/10/2025 (entered with RCE filed on 1/8/2026) have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection set forth above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICKEY NERANGIS whose telephone number is (571)272-2701. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 am - 5:00 pm EST, Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at (571)272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VICKEY NERANGIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 vn
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 07, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600812
DISPERSANTS MADE FROM ISOCYANATES AND AMINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595377
RETROREFLECTIVE AQUEOUS PSEUDOPLASTIC GEL COMPOSITION FOR INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583980
Preparation Method of Super Absorbent Polymer
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570812
FIBER-REINFORCED MOLDED BODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING FIBER-REINFORCED MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559636
METHOD FOR TUNING GLOSS IN PAINT FORMULATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+28.5%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1152 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month