Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/926,577

USER EQUIPMENT (UE) AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 19, 2022
Examiner
LOUIS-FILS, NICOLE M
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
4 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
185 granted / 254 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
304
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
71.0%
+31.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 254 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 01/29/2026 has been entered. Claims 6-7 and 9 remain pending in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/29/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues (page 4) that Youngkyo allegedly fails to disclose: “in a case of accessing the SNPN services via a PLMN using 3GPP access”; “operating in the SNPN access mode over non-3GPP access”; “transmitting the Registration request message to the SNPN via non-3GPP access.” Applicant further asserts that Youngkyo’s three paths (511–513) do not use non-3GPP access when accessing the SNPN via the PLMN. Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive for the reasons below. 1. Accessing SNPN services via a PLMN using 3GPP access. Youngkyo explicitly discloses a path where the UE connects: to a PLMN via 3GPP access, and subsequently accesses the SNPN via the N3IWF. For example, Youngkyo explains that: a terminal may connect to a public network using 3GPP access and then connect to the private network through the N3IWF. This corresponds directly to the claimed scenario: “accessing SNPN services via a PLMN using the 3GPP access.” Thus, Youngkyo explicitly discloses the claimed condition. 2. Operation over non-3GPP access. Youngkyo further discloses the UE establishing a connection over a non-3GPP access network. For example, Youngkyo describes that: the UE obtains an IP address through a non-3GPP connection (e.g., Wi-Fi), the UE establishes a tunnel with the N3IWF to access the SNPN. This teaching corresponds to: “operate in the SNPN access mode over non-3GPP access.” Applicant’s argument (page 5) that Youngkyo lacks an explicit “SNPN access mode” is not persuasive, because the claim does not require any specific signaling mechanism defining such a mode. Operating in an access configuration that uses non-3GPP access to reach the SNPN through N3IWF inherently constitutes operating in an SNPN access mode over non-3GPP access. 3. Transmission of a Registration Request message via non-3GPP access: Youngkyo further discloses that the UE sends a registration request message when accessing the SNPN. Specifically: the UE establishes the tunnel to the N3IWF, the UE transmits a registration request message toward the SNPN. Youngkyo further explains that the registration request message may include an access network parameter indicating non-3GPP access. Thus, Youngkyo explicitly teaches: “transmitting the Registration request message to the SNPN via the non-3GPP access.” 4. Applicant’s interpretation of the three connection paths: Applicant argues (page 6) that none of the three paths use non-3GPP access when accessing the SNPN via the PLMN. However, this interpretation is too narrow. Youngkyo discloses: connection to the PLMN via 3GPP access, and connection to the SNPN via N3IWF, which inherently uses non-3GPP access. Thus, the architecture of Youngkyo inherently includes: 3GPP access to PLMN, and non-3GPP access to SNPN via N3IWF. This corresponds directly to the claimed scenario where: the UE accesses the SNPN services via the PLMN using 3GPP access, and transmits a registration request through non-3GPP access. 5. “SNPN access mode”: Applicant further (page 6) argues that Youngkyo does not explicitly disclose an SNPN access mode. However, the claim does not define any specific protocol state or parameter representing the mode. Youngkyo discloses a UE configuration in which the UE accesses an SNPN through non-3GPP access via N3IWF. Such operation inherently constitutes operating in an SNPN access mode. Therefore the limitation is met. Conclusion: Youngkyo teaches: accessing SNPN services through a PLMN using 3GPP access, establishing non-3GPP connectivity through an N3IWF, and transmitting a registration request message to the SNPN through the non-3GPP access. Accordingly, Youngkyo discloses each limitation of independent claims 6 and 9. Dependent claim 7, which depends from claim 6, is also anticipated for the same reasons. Therefore, the rejection of claims 6, 7, and 9 under 35 U.S.C. §102 is maintained. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Youngkyo et al. (KR 20210044104 A). Regarding claim 6, Youngkyo teaches a User Equipment (UE) (UE 120 of Figs. 1 and 3) comprising: a controller (control unit 330), wherein: in a case of accessing Stand-alone Non-Public Network (SNPN) services using 3GPP access (Referring to FIG. 5, a first path 511 for the UE 120 to access the SNPN#1 501 is based on 3GPP access through the 5G-RAN 102-1, page 5, par 7), the controller is configured to: operate in a (SNPN) access mode over the 3GPP access (UE may attempt to access the SNPN through another path through 3GPP access when it is in an area serviced by the base station of the SNPN, page 6, par 6), and transmit a Registration request message to an SNPN via the 3GPP access in a Registration Procedure for the SNPN (In steps 713 and 715, in order to access the SNPN, the terminal may request registration by transmitting a registration request message to the AMF through the base station. In Step 713, the terminal may include the AN parameter in the registration request message, and the AN parameter or the registration request message may include information on radio capabilities for the 3GPP access of the terminal., page 6, par 6), and in a case of accessing the SNPN services via a Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) using the 3GPP access (There is a method of accessing a public network using 3GPP access and then accessing a private network through N3IWF, page 5, par 8), the controller is further configured to: operate in the SNPN access mode over non-3GPP access (n step 601, a terminal acquires an IP (internet protocol) address through a non-3GPP connection (eg, WiFi). In step 603, in order to access the SNPN, the UE searches for the N3IWF of the SNPN and creates a tunnel between the UE and the N3IWF, page 5, par 10), and transmit the Registration request message to the SNPN via the non-3GPP access in the Registration Procedure for the SNPN (In step 605, in order to access the SNPN, the terminal transmits a registration request message to the N3IWF. In this case, the terminal may include an access network (AN) parameter in the registration request message. The AN parameter may include information or an indicator indicating that the terminal has accessed through a non-3GPP connection, page 5, par 11). Regarding claim 7, Youngkyo teaches the UE according to claim 6, wherein the controller is further configured not to operate in the SNPN access mode over the 3GPP access in a case of accessing the SNPN services via the PLMN using the 3GPP access (The registration rejection message or registration cancellation message may include a specific cause value. For example, "access to the SNPN is not permitted due to multiple access" may be designated as the cause value. In addition, an indicator such as "access type = 3GPP access" or "access type = via PLMN" may be included in order to inform which path the access is rejected. When a registration rejection message or a registration cancellation message including a cause value is received, in step 721, the terminal does not attempt to access the SNPN through the corresponding path, page 6, par 10-11). Regarding claim 9, Youngkyo teaches 0 communication control method performed by a User Equipment (UE) (method of Figs. 5-7), the communication control method comprising: in a case of accessing Stand-alone Non-Public Network (SNPN) services using 3GPP access Referring to FIG. 5, a first path 511 for the UE 120 to access the SNPN#1 501 is based on 3GPP access through the 5G-RAN 102-1, page 5, par 7), operating in a SNPN access mode over the 3GPP access (UE may attempt to access the SNPN through another path through 3GPP access when it is in an area serviced by the base station of the SNPN, page 6, par 6), and transmitting a Registration request message to an SNPN via the 3GPP access in a Registration Procedure for the SNPN (In steps 713 and 715, in order to access the SNPN, the terminal may request registration by transmitting a registration request message to the AMF through the base station. In Step 713, the terminal may include the AN parameter in the registration request message, and the AN parameter or the registration request message may include information on radio capabilities for the 3GPP access of the terminal., page 6, par 6), and in a case of accessing the SNPN services via a Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) using the 3GPP access (There is a method of accessing a public network using 3GPP access and then accessing a private network through N3IWF, page 5, par 8), operating in the (SNPN) access mode over non-3GPP access (in step 601, a terminal acquires an IP (internet protocol) address through a non-3GPP connection (eg, WiFi). In step 603, in order to access the SNPN, the UE searches for the N3IWF of the SNPN and creates a tunnel between the UE and the N3IWF, page 5, par 10), transmitting the Registration request message to the SNPN via the non-3GPP access in the Registration Procedure for the SNPN (In step 605, in order to access the SNPN, the terminal transmits a registration request message to the N3IWF. In this case, the terminal may include an access network (AN) parameter in the registration request message. The AN parameter may include information or an indicator indicating that the terminal has accessed through a non-3GPP connection, page 5, par 11). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICOLE M LOUIS-FILS whose telephone number is (571)270-0671. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Appiah can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE M LOUIS-FILS/Examiner, Art Unit 2641 /JINSONG HU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Sep 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 21, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12581403
DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND MIRROR SERVER FOR LOW-POWER WIRELESS PERSONAL AREA NETWORK SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574132
LEARNING-BASED SIGNAL RECEIVING METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12554007
CONTROLLING DEVICE AND PROCESSING SETTINGS BASED ON RADIO FREQUENCY SENSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12556267
METHOD FOR RECEIVING STORE AND FORWARD SATELLITE OPERATION PARAMETER AND USER EQUIPMENT THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12538317
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 254 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month