Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/926,720

PROGRAMMING METHOD FOR A COATING INSTALLATION, AND CORRESPONDING COATING INSTALLATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 21, 2022
Examiner
ROLLAND, ALEX A
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dürr Systems AG
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allow Rate
271 granted / 585 resolved
-18.7% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
638
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 585 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/6/26 has been entered. Claim Objections Claims 17, 31 objected to because of the following informalities: claims 17 and 31 contain words that are capitalized and should not be. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 17-33 are rejected for lack of antecedent basis for limitations in the claims. There are numerous instances of this problem in the claims and the examiner has attempted to list them all below. If any additional antecedent basis problems are identified, they should be corrected also. Claim 17: “the coating thickness profile” Claim 18: “the simulated coating” “the possible spray pattern data” Claim 20: “the framework” “the operator side” “the coating installation operator” Claim 21: “the framework” “the operator side” “the coating installation operator” “the manufacturer’s side” Claim 22: “the desired coating thickness” “the coating agent layer” “the target layer thickness” “the solids content” “the application efficiency” Claim 25: “the coating thickness homogeneity” Claim 26: “the path distance” Claim 27: “the simulated coating result” Claim 30: “the operator side” “the coating installation operator” Claim 33: “the service provider” Allowable Subject Matter The claims are otherwise allowable assuming the above claim objections and 112 rejections are overcome in a manner that does not broaden the claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Previously cited prior art reference Sadovoy, newly added references Sasaki and Pathre, are collectively the closest prior art. Although these references teach incorporating spray parameters one way or another into simulation work and output of a coating onto a substrate, none of the prior art references teach forming a characteristic diagram that links width of the coating thickness profile, shaping air flow of the application device, and coating agent flow of the application device for use in determining the suitable application parameters from the spray pattern data. An example of a characteristic diagram is shown in Fig. 5 and the definition of a characteristic diagram is a graphical representation illustrating the relationship between interdependent variables that define the performance, behavior, or properties of a component, system, or material. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX A ROLLAND whose telephone number is (571)270-5355. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at 5712721234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX A ROLLAND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 04, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594529
PREPARATION METHOD OF TI3C2TX MXENE QUANTUM DOT (MQD)-MODIFIED POLYAMIDE (PA) REVERSE-OSMOSIS (RO) MEMBRANE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595622
Fabric Substrate and Manufacturing Method Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589390
DETECTION CHIP AND MODIFICATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586764
PLASMA SHOWERHEAD TREATMENT METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577667
CYCLIC ALKYL AMINO CARBENE (CAAC) DEPOSITION BY TRANSMETALLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+27.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month