Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/926,866

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING MOBILITY FOR COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF NETWORK DATA IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 21, 2022
Examiner
CHAU, PETER P
Art Unit
2476
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
444 granted / 570 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+41.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 570 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/24/25 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see section IV, with respect to claims 4, 11, 17, and 20 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The objection of claims 4, 11, 17, and 20 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see section V, with respect to claims 4, 11, 17, and 20 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) of claims 4, 11, 17, and 20 has been withdrawn. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) was/were submitted on 10/27/25. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim(s) 20 is/are objected to because of the following informalities: it is suggested to change “analytics information” in lines 4 and 8 to “the analytics information” to be consistent with claims 4 and 11 and 17. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 7-8, 10-11, and 13-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 8, and 14-15, it is unclear what “the analytics subscription” is being referred to since there is a plurality of analytics subscriptions. All claims dependent on claims 1, 8, and 14-15 fail to resolve the deficiency of their respective independent claim and are thus rejected under similar rationale. Regarding claim 10, it is unclear what “the analytics information” in line 7 is referring to since there are a plurality of analytics information in claims 8 and 10. Claim 11 fails to resolve the deficiency of claim 10 and is thus rejected under similar rationale. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER P CHAU whose telephone number is (571)270-7152. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 A.M - 6 P.M. ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER P CHAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 24, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Sep 08, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604352
Link Availability and Status Indication for Multi-Link Operation in WLAN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593223
RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION FOR VOICE AND DATA SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587887
MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING FOR UE-TO-UE INTERFERENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581332
CHANNEL STATUS REPORT BASED ON SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL RESOURCE USAGE IN FULL DUPLEX
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556905
USER EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY INDICATION FOR UPLINK TRANSMISSION CONFIGURATION INDICATION STATE AND SPATIAL RELATION INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+41.7%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 570 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month