Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/927,870

METHOD FOR THE MACHINE-BASED DETERMINATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL STATE OF SUPPORT ROLLERS OF A BELT CONVEYOR SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND MACHINE-READABLE DATA CARRIER

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 25, 2022
Examiner
CRAWFORD, GENE O
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Thyssenkrupp AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
14 granted / 32 resolved
-8.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
36
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 32 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed October 27, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues Staab is silent regarding “an identification image region position” and “an analysis image region position” in the “identification image region position”. However, while Staab does not disclose the aforementioned recitations, Staab does disclose equivalents to said recitations, when taking Staab disclosure as a whole. Staab discloses that thermal imaging sensor (30) is aimed at roller structure/”subregion” (24) to capture visual and thermal images of rollers (12, 12’) of each roller structure, also including an underside of the belt (column 3, lines 50-58). Each roller structure (24) image taken by imaging sensor (30) as unmanned vehicle travels along conveyor (10) in operation, represents “an identification image region position” as broadly claimed. The “identification image region position” in Staab representing each roller structure position (24). The hotspot (36) in an image disclosed in Staab, shown in fig 3, represents “an analysis image region position” in the “identification image region position” where a functional state of the support roller is determined based on analysis of the images hotspots and sensor structure data related to temperature and position, as broadly claimed. For the foregoing reasons the claims stand rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-13 and 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Staab et al. (claims 1, 16) Staab et al. discloses method and system for the machine-based determination of the functional state of support rollers 12, 12’ of a belt conveyor system (10) during operation of the belt conveyor system, the method including during operation of the belt conveyor system sensing image data of at least one subregion of the belt conveyor system, via a thermal imaging sensor (28) on at least one unmanned vehicle (22) wherein the image data includes thermal image data (column 4, lines 4-7); identifying in the image data an identification image region position, a subregion/roller structure (24) of the belt conveyor system including a support roller (12, 12’), defining for the identification image region an analysis image region and determining, in the analysis image region position the functional state of the support roller 24, 12,12’ (column 4, lines 10-20); (claims 2, 10, 17) moving the unmanned vehicle (22) along the subregion/roller structure (24) of the belt conveyor system and identifying the identification image region position, i.e. the location of a respective roller structure (24) to be viewed by the sensor (28), defining the analysis image region position includes spatially corresponding the analysis image region position to the identification image region position via thermal image sensor (28); determining temperature data of the relevant support roller and assigning temperature data to a functional state of the support roller (column 8, lines 34-53); (claim 3) the image data includes photographic image data (figure 3); (claims 4, 8) identifying the identification image region position includes identifying support rollers identifying the analysis image region to associate with the identification image region position (column 4, lines 10-20); (claims 5, 11) improving recognition quality of the identification image region position via a learning procedure carried out by a neural network (column 8, lines 34-53); (claim 6) selecting thermal image data for analysis in the analysis image region position (column 3, lines 53-61); (claim 7) selecting the thermal image data includes selecting thermal image data having circular or non-circular contours and/or in which the thermal data corresponds to temperatures of an equal temperature level (figure 3); (claim 9) assigning image data to a belt position via a radio based position determination by comparing the image data against reference image data (column 4, lines 10-20); (claim 12, 18) recording the functional state, image data and temperature data for the support roller in a functional state data collection (column 4, lines 17-20 and column 8, lines 34-53); (claim 13) detecting when a support roller is functionally impaired, determining a time for replacement and outputting the time for replacement to a communication device (column 8, lines 44-53). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GENE O CRAWFORD whose telephone number is (571)272-6911. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thurs 6a-5p; Fri 6a-2p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Thomas can be reached at (571) 272-8022. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 27, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602679
Multi-functional shopping cart, system, and method for shopping
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12559311
GRID FRAMEWORK STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12545512
METHOD FOR OPERATING A STORAGE ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12510899
METHOD FOR OPERATING A PLANAR MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12434602
SEAT FOR A VEHICLE AND VEHICLE COMPRISING SUCH A SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 32 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month