Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/928,376

Body Composition Measuring Device Using Nine Segments and Operation Method Thereof

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Nov 29, 2022
Priority
Jul 08, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0084255 +2 more
Examiner
MELHUS, BENJAMIN S
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Inbody Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
242 granted / 400 resolved
-9.5% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
442
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
73.7%
+33.7% vs TC avg
§102
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 400 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 4 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim(s) 4 and 13 do not further limit the determination of edema which is now recited in amended claim(s) 1 and 10. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office act0ion: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7-14, and 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masuo (US 20040059242 A1) in view of Cha (US 20180098735 A1). For claim(s) 1, 10, and 18, Masuo teaches A body composition measuring device [entire disclosure – see at least abstract] comprising: both hand electrode parts and both foot electrode parts, each of which has a plurality of electrodes; two arm electrode parts attached to elbow joint regions of both arms, respectively; two leg electrode parts attached to knee joint regions of both legs, respectively; [electrodes 10 and 11 in ¶250] and a processing unit [1] for causing electric current to flow through different combinations of the both hand electrode parts, the both foot electrode parts, the arm electrode parts, and the leg electrode parts at the time of measurement so as to measure impedance values of a measurement object, and then analyzing the body composition of the measurement object. [¶¶253-254] For claim(s) 1, 4, 10, and 13, Masuo fails to teach determining edema based on a change rate. Cha teaches an impedance system [abstract] comprising a step / function of determining edema when a change rate of a low frequency impedance is higher than a change rate of a high frequency impedance. [¶151] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed to modify the device and method of Masuo to incorporate the impedance determination of Cha in order to determine whether the subject requires treatment or has a condition that could affect their health status. As motivated by Cha ¶¶148-152 and Masuo ¶¶293-294. For claim(s) 2 and 11, Masuo teaches wherein the processing unit is configured to cause electric current to flow through different combinations of the both hand electrode parts, the both foot electrode parts, the arm electrode parts, and the leg electrode parts, divide the measurement object into nine segments of an upper left arm (ULA), a lower left arm (LLA), a upper right arm (URA), a lower right arm (LRA), a trunk (TR), an upper left leg (ULL), a lower left leg (LLL), an upper right leg (URL), and a lower right leg (LRL), and measure impedance values of the segments. [abstract, ¶¶91-92, ¶221, ¶266] For claim(s) 3 and 12, Masuo teaches wherein the processing unit is configured to apply the electric current to first electrodes comprised in one pair among the both hand electrode parts, the both foot electrode parts, the arm electrode parts, and the leg electrode parts for a body composition measurement, obtain a voltage for the electric current from second electrodes comprised in the pair, and measure an impedance value of a segment between the pair by using the electric current and the voltage. [abstract, ¶¶91-92, ¶221, ¶266] For claim(s) 5 and 14, Masuo teaches wherein at least some of the arm electrode parts and the leg electrode parts comprises an adsorption plate [81] adsorbing to an attachment part [81a] and at least one electrode [82] in contact with the attachment part inside the adsorption plate. [Fig. 39] For claim(s) 7 and 16, Masuo teaches wherein at least some of the arm electrode parts and the leg electrode parts comprises at least one electrode [82] in contact with the attachment part [81a] and a sheet [81] surrounding a periphery of the attachment part to maintain the contact. For claim(s) 8, Masuo teaches wherein at least some of the arm electrode parts and the leg electrode parts comprises an electrode board configured to adjust a frequency of the electric current. [¶251] For claim(s) 9 and 17, Masuo teaches wherein the body composition measuring device is in a form of a chair, the arm electrode parts are disposed on arm rests of the chair, and the leg electrode parts are disposed on parts of the chair in contact with the knees. [Fig. 50] Claim(s) 6 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Masuo in view of Lundback (US 5891028 A). For claim(s) 6 and 15, Masuo fails to teach a pressure regulator. Lundback teaches a biosignals measurement electrode [abstract] comprising a pressure regulator. [Fig. 9, col. 5] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed to modify the electrodes of Masuo to incorporate the pressure regulator of Lundback in order to ensure a stable and reliable connection of the electrode to the skin of the subject. As motivated by Lundback cols.1-2. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the prior art have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the new combination of references being used in the current rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN S MELHUS whose telephone number is (571)272-5342. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday | 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Chen can be reached on 571-272-3672. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN S MELHUS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Oct 20, 2025
Response Filed
May 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667270
CABLE FOR USE WITH PRESSURE MONITORING CATHETERS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12642453
CALCULATION DEVICE, CALCULATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12635957
METHODS AND KITS FOR ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL AND OPHTHALMIC FUNCTION AND LOCALIZING NEUROLOGICAL LESIONS
5y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629501
MEDICAL DEVICE WITH SUPPORT MEMBER
4y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633401
MODULAR AUTOMATED PHYSICAL HEALTH TESTING SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES AND METHODS
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.5%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 400 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month