Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/928,455

NOTIFICATION DISPLAY METHOD AND TERMINAL

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 29, 2022
Examiner
MATTHEWS, ANDRE L
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
6 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
307 granted / 503 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
539
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 503 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 31,33, 34, 36, 38, 40-41, 43, 46-50 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 31 and 48-49 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 31, and 48-49 recite “….. a first icon of a first application is displayed in the flat display region…..displaying a first banner in the flat display region… displaying a first symbol in the curved display region….. displaying a second symbol on the first icon in the flay display region…..when no operation on the first banner, the first symbol, or the first icon is detected within a first predetermined time period in which the first symbol is displayed in the curved display region, enabling the first symbol to automatically disappear from the flat display region and the first banner to automatically disappear from the curved screen.” Since the first symbol is displayed in the curved display region, as required by claim language, it is unclear why/how the first symbol would disappear from the flat display region. Likewise with the first banner being displayed in the flat display region, as required by claim language, it is unclear why/how the first banner would disappear from the curved display region. It appears the claim language should require the first symbol to disappear from the curved display region while the first banner disappears form the flat display region. Claims 33, 34, 36, 38, 40, 41, 43, 46, 47, and 50 inherit the rejection based on dependency of claims 31, and 48-49. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRE L MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)270-5806. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571-272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDRE L MATTHEWS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 13, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Aug 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 17, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 12, 2024
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 11, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 14, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 16, 2025
Interview Requested
Jun 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592187
Zonal Attenuation Compensation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586494
COLOR CALIBRATION SYSTEM AND COLOR CALIBRATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575301
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567349
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12546652
LIGHT DETECTION MODULE, LIGHT DETECTION METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+17.0%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 503 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month