Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/928,455

NOTIFICATION DISPLAY METHOD AND TERMINAL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 29, 2022
Priority
Jun 16, 2020 — CN 202010549282.6 +1 more
Examiner
MATTHEWS, ANDRE L
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
318 granted / 516 resolved
At TC average
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
551
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
87.2%
+47.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 516 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 31,33, 34, 36, 38, 40-41, 43, 46-50 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 31 and 48-49 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 31, and 48-49 recite “….. a first icon of a first application is displayed in the flat display region…..displaying a first banner in the flat display region… displaying a first symbol in the curved display region….. displaying a second symbol on the first icon in the flay display region…..when no operation on the first banner, the first symbol, or the first icon is detected within a first predetermined time period in which the first symbol is displayed in the curved display region, enabling the first symbol to automatically disappear from the flat display region and the first banner to automatically disappear from the curved screen.” Since the first symbol is displayed in the curved display region, as required by claim language, it is unclear why/how the first symbol would disappear from the flat display region. Likewise with the first banner being displayed in the flat display region, as required by claim language, it is unclear why/how the first banner would disappear from the curved display region. It appears the claim language should require the first symbol to disappear from the curved display region while the first banner disappears form the flat display region. Claims 33, 34, 36, 38, 40, 41, 43, 46, 47, and 50 inherit the rejection based on dependency of claims 31, and 48-49. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRE L MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)270-5806. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571-272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDRE L MATTHEWS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 12 earlier events
Jun 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682863
LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670884
METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM FOR COMPENSATING BRIGHTNESS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663873
GESTURE INSTRUCTION EXECUTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658155
METHOD FOR ADJUSTING CHROMATICITY OF DISPLAY DEVICE AND THE DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646474
DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+16.4%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 516 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month