Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 17/930,708

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 08, 2022
Priority
Mar 10, 2020 — CN 202010162922.8 +1 more
Examiner
WU, JIANYE
Art Unit
2462
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
713 granted / 870 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
914
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
57.6%
+17.6% vs TC avg
§102
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 870 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/29/26 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/08/26 have been fully considered but they are moot due to the fact that all independent claims have been amended to which new ground rejections have been made as shown below. For the purpose of speedy prosecution, Examiner is addressing Applicant’s main argument points below: For claim 2, Applicant argues D1 and Kung does not disclose “determining... a duration T1 of a first timer" (p9, last para) because D1 fails to disclose that the duration of this timer is dynamically determined based on a time interval between a timing of a current transmission resource and a timing of a next transmission resource as indicated by received SCI (p9, full para), and Kung does not disclose “the duration of any timer is derived from SCI-indicated resource timing information, let along that the duration is based on a time interval between timings of transmission resources …“ (p11, last full para). In response, Examiner respectfully disagrees. D1 discloses a duration T1 as “DRX ON period” or “DRX cycle” in FIG. 4 that is based on a timer such as onDurationTimerSL. And Kung teaches in [0392] “… If concept of the timer is reused for SL, and the Rx UE receives a SCI indicating new transmission from a Tx UE, the Rx UE could start or restart the timer in response to the reception of the SCI. …”, which teaches that a timer may be based on SCI. Applying the teaching of Kung above to the timer by D1 discloses a dynamic timer. Therefore, Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. Applicant ‘s arguments to other claims are not persuasive because they are based on the argument to claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3, 8, 10-11, 21, 23-24 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DI (US 20230014303 A1) in view of Kung (US 20210227622 A1). For independent claim 2, DI discloses a wireless communication method (FIGs. 16-20 and 24-25), comprising: determining, by a first terminal device (FIG. 16, UE1), that the first terminal device is in DRX activation time (FIGs. 1-4, 10-20 and the related text, such as ([0114] “The terms Active Mode and DRX ON time may be used interchangeably. These refer to the periods when the UE is actively monitoring the SCI/PSCCH for sidelink transmissions.”; note that SCI is a Sidelink CSI) and “DRX on time” being “a period for receiving a unicast connection establishment request and before completing unicast establishment” and “[0216] … At step 241, UE 201 may determine that DTX may be used on SL transmissions to UE 202. At step 242, UE 201 may send a request message to UE 202 to enable SL DRX. …”) during the following periods (“[0505] … The SL DRX active time may comprise one or more of the following times:”): a period for receiving a unicast connection establishment request and before completing unicast establishment (FIG. 16 and the related text, such as the period between step 240 to 244” and “[0002] … The communication may be unicast (between a UE and a single peer UE)”); a period of waiting to receive a channel state information CSI report (FIG. 16 and the related text, such as “[0505] … The SL DRX active time may comprise one or more of the following times: … times during which UE has issued a Channel State information (CSI) request to a communicatively connected peer UE and the MAC entity is waiting for the SL-CSI report (from this peer UE)”); a period of sending a first request message and before receiving a response message of the first request message (FIG. 16 and the related text, such as the period between step for sending SL DRX Request 242 to step for receiving SL DRX response 244”); and a period of sending a unicast connection setup request and before completing unicast establishment (FIG. 16 and the related text, such as the period between step 240 to 244” and “[0002] … The communication may be unicast (between a UE and a single peer UE)”); sending, by the first terminal device, first configuration information to a second terminal device (FIG. 16, UE2) to request establishment of a sidelink connection to the first terminal device (FIG. 16 and the related text, such as step 242, and “[0216] … At step 242, UE 201 may send a request message to UE 202 to enable SL DRX. …”); and monitoring, by the first terminal device, sidelink control information (SCI) within the DRX activation time (FIG. 17 and the related text, steps 256-258, and “[0230] At step 256, UE 201 sends a message to UE 203 to inform UE 203 that UE 201 will be using DRX, and providing the SL DRX configuration. This message may be a new RRC message, a new IE in an existing RRC message, a MAC CE message, or alternatively a layer 1 control message (such as carried in the SCI). [0231] … At step 257, UE 203 stores the relevant DRX configuration for UE 201. At step 258, UE 203 sends a confirmation message to UE 201 …“); receiving, by the first terminal device within the DRX activation time, first SCI sent by a second terminal device, wherein first data associated with the first SCI is data of the first terminal device, and the first SCI indicates that the second terminal device reserves a retransmission resource of the first data for the first terminal device (FIGs. 16-17 and the related text, such as, step 242, 256, and “[0230] At step 256, UE 201 sends a message to UE 203 to inform UE 203 that UE 201 will be using DRX, and providing the SL DRX configuration. This message may be … a MAC CE message, or alternatively a layer 1 control message (such as carried in the SCI). [0231] … At step 257, UE 203 stores the relevant DRX configuration for UE 201. At step 258, UE 203 sends a confirmation message to UE 201, confirming that it has received the SL DRX configuration. …“); and determining, by the first terminal device, a duration T1 of a first timer based on a time interval between a timing of a current transmission resource and a timing of a next transmission, wherein the first timer is used to control a minimum length of a time before next data retransmission in a same hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process (FIGs. 1-20 and the related text, such as step 241 in view of “[0302] A UE may have one or more SL DRX groups. A SL DRX group has a single SL DRX configuration that controls the SL DRX operation. … [0305] Each of the SL DRX configurations for the UE may be configured with parameters, such as drx-onDurationTimerSL, drx-InactivityTimerSL, drx-RetransmissionTimerTXSL, drx-RetransmissionTimerRXSL, drx-LongCycleStartOffsetSL, drx-ShortCycleSL, drx-SlotOffsetSL, drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerRXSL, drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerTXSL or drx-ShortCycleTimerSL. ...” and “[0311] drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerRXSL (per SL HARQ process): the minimum duration before a SL assignment for HARQ retransmission is expected by the MAC entity”; note that T1 is “DRX ON period” or “DRX cycle” based on onDurationTimerSL in FIG. 4). DI is silent on, but Kung, in the same field of endeavor of Sidelink communication, discloses wherein the time interval the first timer is started indicated by the first SCI received from the second terminal device (“[0392] … The UE monitors the PDCCH when the timer is running. A purpose for the timer is for the UE to monitor other PDCCH indicating new transmission scheduled by a base station. If concept of the timer is reused for SL, and the Rx UE receives a SCI indicating new transmission from a Tx UE, the Rx UE could start or restart the timer in response to the reception of the SCI. …”; note that the SCI is received from the sending/second terminal). OOSA would have been motivated to apply the teaching of Kung above to the sidelink communication system by DI to yield a predictable result of monitoring sidelink communication. Therefore, it would have been obvious to OOSA before the effective filing date of the application to combine Hosseini and DI for the benefit of monitoring sidelink communication ([0392] of Kung). Independent claim 8 is rejected because it is a claim of a generic apparatus that performs the method of claim 2 and has the same subject matter. Independent claims 21 and 23 are rejected because each of them comprising instructions to perform the method of claim 2 and has the same subject matter. As to claims 3, 10, 23 and 26, DI in view of Kung discloses claims 2, 8, 21 and 24, DI further discloses: receiving, by the first terminal device within the DRX activation time, second SCI sent by the second terminal device, wherein second data transmitted on associated with the second SCI is data of the first terminal device, and the second SCI indicates that the second terminal device does not reserve a retransmission resource for the first terminal device (FIGs. 16-17 and the related text, such as, step 244, 258, which include SCI included in the SL DRX Response message sent by the UE2, in view of explanation of the parent claims); and determining, by the first terminal device, duration of a second timer based on configuration information received from the second terminal device, wherein the configuration information comprises information about the second timer, and the second timer is used to control a time from next data retransmission in a same hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process (FIGs. 16-20 and the related text, such as “[0305] Each of the SL DRX configurations for the UE may be configured with parameters, such as drx-onDurationTimerSL, drx-InactivityTimerSL, drx-RetransmissionTimerTXSL, drx-RetransmissionTimerRXSL, drx-LongCycleStartOffsetSL, drx-ShortCycleSL, drx-SlotOffsetSL, drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerRXSL, drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerTXSL or drx-ShortCycleTimerSL. ...”), wherein the first timer is used to control a minimum length of a time before next data retransmission in a same hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process (FIGs. 16-20 and the related text, such as “[0311] drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerRXSL (per SL HARQ process): the minimum duration before a SL assignment for HARQ retransmission is expected by the MAC entity;” in view of the parent claims; note that the second timer information is included in the SL DRX Response message received by the first terminal device, such as UE1 in FIG. 16). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIANYE WU whose telephone number is (571)270-1665. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 8am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached on (571) 272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIANYE WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Dec 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750844
CONFIGURED GRANT BASED SMALL DATA TRANSMISSION (CG-SDT) IN MULTIBEAM OPERATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745180
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739766
SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL DETERMINATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12713407
Polar Coding for Beam Sweeping Broadcast Channel
4y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12713431
RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 870 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month