Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/932,864

Forming Through Hole in Component Carrier by Laser Drilling Blind Hole and Extending the Latter by Etching

Non-Final OA §103§DP
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Examiner
CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
At&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
587 granted / 940 resolved
-7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
988
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 940 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-5, 7-13 and 16 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Allowable Subject Matter The indicated allowability of claims 1-5, 7-13, 16 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Chen. Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Double Patenting Applicant is advised that should claim 1 be found allowable, claim 16 will be objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate thereof. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5, 7, 10, 11 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (CN112203440A) in view of Jang (previously cited KR 20030047088 A). Regarding claims 1 and 16, Chen discloses (limitations not disclosed are crossed out): A method of manufacturing a component carrier, the method comprising: laser drilling a blind hole (113, Fig. 2; see [0019] and [0020]) in a layer stack; and subsequently extending the blind hole to a through hole wherein the method comprises extending the blind hole to the to produce a through hole wherein the backside electrically conductive layer structure has a larger overhang than a frontside electrically conductive layer structure (112). Chen also discloses filling the through hole with a filling medium (electroplating copper 115), as in claim 7, as well as the lack of an offset between a center of the through hole at a frontside and a center of the through hole at a backside of the layer stack, as in claim 10. However, Chen does not disclose the specific manner of forming the through hole, nor the further details of claims 3-5, 8, 9 and 11-13. Jang discloses the claimed invention as follows (refer to the first full paragraph on second page of translation; limitations not disclosed by Chen are crossed out): Claim 1. A method of manufacturing a component carrier, the method comprising: laser drilling (see [37] and Fig. 8(c)) a blind hole (105, Fig. 8(d)) in a layer stack (structure of Fig. 8(a)); and subsequently extending the blind hole to a through hole (105, Fig. 8(f)) by etching (see [38]), wherein the method comprises laser drilling the blind hole in the layer stack only from one side of the layer stack (see Fig. 8(c)), wherein the method comprises extending the blind hole to produce a through hole by etching in a region of the blind hole simultaneously at two opposing exposed surface portions of a backside electrically conductive layer structure of the layer stack on an electrically insulating layer structure of the layer stack (see Fig. 8(e) and [38]), Claim 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises laser drilling through1 the frontside electrically conductive layer structure (102a; see Fig. 8(b)) of the layer stack and into at least part of an electrically insulating layer structure (101) of the layer stack. Claim 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises forming a window in the frontside electrically conductive layer structure (102a, Fig. 8(b); see [36]) of the layer stack by etching, and thereafter laser drilling (Figs. 8(c) and 8(d); see [37]) through the window into at least part of the electrically insulating layer structure. Claim 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises laser drilling through the entire electrically insulating layer structure of the layer stack up to the backside electrically conductive layer structure of the layer stack as a stop layer. See [37]. Claim 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the method comprises, after said laser drilling through the entire electrically insulating layer structure up to the backside electrically conductive layer structure, forming a window in the backside electrically conductive layer structure by etching (see Figs. 8(e) and 8(f); see [38]). Claim 7. The method according to claim 1, Claim 8. The method according to claim 7, Claim 9. The method according to claim 7, Claim 10. The method according to claim 1, comprising at least one of the following features: wherein the method comprises laser drilling the blind hole using at least one of a carbon dioxide laser and an ultraviolet laser (see “CO2 laser (104)” in [37]); wherein, before etching, at least one of the frontside electrically conductive layer structure and the backside electrically conductive layer structure of the layer stack has a thickness of not more than 20 µm; wherein, after etching, least one of the frontside electrically conductive layer structure and the backside electrically conductive layer structure of the layer stack has a thickness in a range from 1 µm to 7 µm; wherein the etching comprises a first etching process for removing surface metal material followed by a second etching process enhancing surface roughness, wherein the first etching process comprises a desmear process and/or the second etching process comprises a flash etching process; wherein the method comprises forming the through hole without a lateral offset between a center of the through hole on the frontside and a center of the through hole on the backside of the layer stack (see [39]); wherein the method comprises filling the through hole in the layer stack with an electrically conductive filling medium without bridge plating, wherein the layer stack has a thickness below 80 µm. Claim 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises protecting at least part of an exterior surface of at least one of the frontside electrically conductive layer structure at the frontside of the layer stack and the backside electrically conductive layer structure at the backside of the layer stack by a protection structure (“resist” in [36]) at least during the etching, and patterning the protection structure before the etching (see “exposure, development” in [36]). Claim 12. The method according to claim 1, Claim 13. The method according to claim 12, comprising at least one of the following features: Claim 16. A method of manufacturing a component carrier, the method comprising: laser drilling (see [37] and Fig. 8(c)) a blind hole (105, Fig. 8(d)) in a layer stack (structure of Fig. 8(a)); and subsequently extending the blind hole to a through hole (105, Fig. 8(f)) by etching (see [38]), wherein the method comprises laser drilling the blind hole in the layer stack only from one side of the layer stack (see Fig. 8(c)), wherein the method comprises extending the blind hole to the through hole by etching in a region of the blind hole simultaneously at two opposing exposed surface portions of a backside electrically conductive layer structure of the layer stack on an electrically insulating layer structure of the layer stack (see Fig. 8(e) and [38]), Jang discloses the claimed invention, except for the limitations crossed out above. Chen teaches the holes can be formed using lasers (see [0022]). However, Chen teaches that laser drilling through copper requires high-power lasers, which can vaporize substances when processing the copper, which can affect the optical lens of the laser generator, thereby affecting performance (see [27]). Such problems are avoided by using the process disclosed by Jang (see [42]). In view of the combined teachings of Jang and Chen, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to modify the process of Chen so that the through holes through the conductive layers and through the insulating layer are formed using the process taught by Jang, for the advantages disclosed by Jang, such as avoiding contamination of the optical lens. Regarding the small hole 114, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious that the patterning to delimit the area to be etched would have been modified accordingly, to ensure the lower hole 114 is still formed small. Claim(s) 8, 9, 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen in view of Jang, further in view of Rivett (previously-cited EP0189975A1). Cheng as modified in view of Jang discloses the claimed invention except for filling the through hole at least partially with a filling medium by electroless plating to form a seed layer and electroplating on the seed layer, as claimed in claims 8 and 9. Modified Chen also does not discloses forming at least one electrically conductive trace based on at least one of a frontside electrically conductive layer structure and a backside electrically conductive layer structure, and at least one of the following features: a) the method comprises forming the at least one electrically conductive trace by patterning at least one of the frontside electrically conductive layer structure and the backside electrically conductive layer structure, by etching simultaneously with the extending of the blind hole to the through hole by etching; and b) the method comprises plating the at least one electrically conductive trace simultaneously with at least partially filling the through hole by the plating. Rivett shows it is known in the art to form a seed layer (20, Figs. 4 and 6) on the walls of a through hole by electroless plating (col. 2, Ins. 17-21) and thereafter electroplating (24, 26, 28, Fig. 6; see col. 2, Ins. 27-35) to partially fill the through hole with a conductive medium, thereby forming a plated through hole electrically connecting two conductive layers. In view of the teachings of Rivett, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to form a seed layer by electroless plating inside the through hole, followed by the electroplating, to thereby form the electroplated material 115. Rivett also shows it is known to pattern the two conductive layers (compare Fig. 1 and Fig. 3) to thereby form conductor patterns, such as trace 18 in Fig. 3, prior to plating the through hole. When the through hole is electrolessly-plated, the trace is also simultaneously electrolessly-plated (compare Figs. 3 and 4; see col. 2, Ins. 17-21). In view of the teachings of Rivett, one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to pattern the conductive layers 111 and 112 of Chen, prior to the electroless plating, to define circuit layers including traces, followed by electroless plating of the entire substrate, masking while leaving exposed areas to be electroplated, then electroplating to form a plated layer, including in through holes, whereby the electroless layer that was covered by the mask can be removed. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to do so, as a choice among conventional printed circuit board fabrication techniques for patterning conductive layers and plating of through holes, with predictable results. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIVIUS R CAZAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8032. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday noon-8:30 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIVIUS R. CAZAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729 1 The laser drilling into the insulating layer structure occurs through the conductive layer 102a, since the laser 104 passes through the opening in the conductive layer. See Fig. 8(c).
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Dec 16, 2024
Response Filed
May 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Aug 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Oct 27, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Feb 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12550268
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CIRCUIT WIRING BY THREE-DIMENSIONAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12528254
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A 3D ELECTROMECHANICAL COMPONENT HAVING AT LEAST ONE EMBEDDED ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12506458
PACKAGING MODULE AND PACKAGING METHOD OF BAW RESONATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12501551
Method for Embedding a Component in a Printed Circuit Board
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12500494
METHOD FOR HARDENING A BRIDGE ASSEMBLY OF A ROTATIONAL BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+25.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 940 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month