Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/934,478

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Examiner
VU, QUOC THAI NGOC
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
411 granted / 591 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 591 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 04, 20265 has been entered. Claims 1-23 are now pending in the present application. Claims 8-23 have been withdrawn from consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rappoport et al. (US 2013/0076573, “Rappoport”. Regarding claim 1, Rappoport teaches an electronic device (FIG. 5), comprising: a housing defining an internal volume and an opening (FIG. 5, housing 12 includes internal volume 64 and an opening where display cover layer 60 is located ); a grounding component disposed in the internal volume ([0037], [0038]); a rear cover disposed in the opening, an inner surface of the rear cover defining the internal volume (FIG. 5 housing wall 66 covers the internal volume 64); and a conductive antenna component embedded within the rear cover (FIG. 5, [0036] “antenna structures 24 can be embedded within housing wall 66” ), the conductive antenna is electrically connected to the grounding component (FIG. 5, [0037] “conductive structures such as portions 70 and 72 of antenna structures 24 may be configured to protrude through the surface of housing wall 66 and may serve as one or more antenna terminals (e.g., antenna feed terminals such as feed terminals 42 and/or 44 of FIG. 3)”. [0038] “Antenna structures 24 may include antenna resonating element structures such as antenna resonating element 34 of FIG. 3 and/or ground plane structures such as ground structures 32”) defines a first opening (FIG. 5, [0037] “conductive structures such as portions 70 and 72 of antenna structures 24 may be configured to protrude through the surface of housing wall 66”); and is disposed peripherally around an electromagnetically transparent component ([0040] “The antenna structures that are formed by fabrication equipment 79 may include conductive antenna structures such as ground plane 32 and antenna resonating element 34 of FIG. 3 and optional dielectric substrate structures such as structure 24SUB. Dielectric structures 24SUB may be, for example, a flexible printed circuit ("flex circuit") substrate formed from a sheet of flexible polymer such as polyimide, a rigid printed circuit substrate such as a layer of fiberglass-filled epoxy (e.g., FR4), a plastic carrier, or other dielectric substrate on which patterned metal traces have been formed to form conductive antenna structures 24. [0051] “the material of wall 66 may allow radio-frequency antenna signals from antenna structures 24 to pass in and out of device 10”). Regarding claim 2, Rappoport teaches claim 1 and further teaches wherein the conductive antenna component is disposed outside the internal volume (FIG. 5, antenna structure 24 is located outside internal volume 64). Regarding claim 3, Rappoport teaches claim 1 and further teaches wherein the antenna component is entirely embedded within the rear cover (FIG. 5, [0036] “antenna structures 24 can be embedded within housing wall 66” ). Regarding claim 4, Rappoport teaches claim 1 and further teaches wherein an outer surface of the rear cover defines an external surface of the electronic device (FIG. 6, wall 66 has outer surface). Regarding claim 5, Rappoport teaches claim 1 and further teaches wherein: the rear cover extends across a thickness defined between the outer surface and the inner surface; and the antenna component is disposed within the thickness (FIG. 5). Regarding claim 6, Rappoport teaches claim 1 and further teaches wherein the rear cover comprises a plastic ([0057] “… antenna structures are located under an exterior housing structure such as housing wall 66 of FIG. 5, a housing wall formed by plastic 82 of FIG. 6, or a housing wall formed by overmolded plastic 66 of FIG. 9).”) Regarding claim 7, Rappoport teaches claim 1 and further teaches wherein: the rear cover defines a second opening; and the first opening of the antenna component corresponds in position with the second opening (FIG. 5, [0037] “conductive structures such as portions 70 and 72 of antenna structures 24 may be configured to protrude through the surface of housing wall 66”). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-7 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUOC THAI NGOC VU whose telephone number is (571)270-5901. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9:30AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rafael Perez-Gutierrez can be reached at 571-272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUOC THAI N VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 21, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Aug 13, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598370
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597955
HIGH FREQUENCY MODULE AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593275
Power Saving Method for Monitoring Data Channel
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592727
OVERSAMPLED MULTIPLE-CORRELATOR SYMBOL SYNCHRONIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587921
STORING BEAM RELATED INFORMATION OF USED BEAM AT THE TIME OF INITIATING THE TIME-TO-TRIGGER PROCEDURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 591 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month