Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/935,327

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A TOTAL AMOUNT OF CARBON EMISSIONS OF AN INDIVIDUAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 26, 2022
Priority
Mar 27, 2020 — provisional 63/000,874 +1 more
Examiner
KRAFT, LOGAN M
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Quanata LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 390 resolved
At TC average
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
434
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
81.4%
+41.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 390 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4, 6, 9, 10, 13, 15, 18 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Husain (US 2021/0072033) in view of Matus et al (US 2019/0005412). Husain teaches: A computer-implemented method for determining a total amount of carbon emissions of an individual during a predetermined time duration (see Husain, paragraph 52), the method comprising: collecting, by a computing device, one or more individual telematics data associated with a user during a predetermined time duration (see Matus et al, paragraphs 2, 12, 19, 32 and 52. “OBD data”, “vehicle operations data” “biometric data”, “fuel data”, etc. par. 32); generating, by the computing device, first lifestyle data indicative of one or more lifestyle activities engaged by the user based at least in part upon the one or more individual telematics data; (see Matus et al, paragraphs 19 and 32) estimating, by the computing device, a total amount of carbon emissions associated with the user during the predetermined time duration based at least in part upon the first lifestyle data (see Husain, paragraph 52). Husain teaches as outlined above the idea of determining carbon emissions data of an individual based at least on a driving style (lifestyle data) (see Husain paragraph 52). Husain, however, does not explicitly teach how the driving style (lifestyle data) of the individual is determined. However, Matus et al teaches using telematics data to determine driving style (lifestyle data) of the individual (driver). See Matus et al, paragraphs 2, 12, 19, 32 and 52. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have derived the individual’s driving style in Husain’s carbon emission determination method by using telematics data as already known and taught by Matus et al since this would have provided for an effective way of determining an individual’s driving style. With respect to claims 4, 13 and 19 training of a first model, see the “user data sets” taught by Matus et al at paragraph 52. With respect to claim 9, sending a notification when exceeding a carbon threshold is considered to be an obvious matter of design choice. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2,3,5,7,8,11,12,14,16, 17 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERICK R SOLIS whose telephone number is (571)272-4853. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9 -5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at (571) 270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERICK R SOLIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12606135
DECELERATION TURNING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, TOWED VEHICLE AND COUPLED VEHICLES
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12565180
TRAILER BRAKE FADE RECOGNITION AND MITIGATION SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12491747
METHODS FOR CREATING CLEARANCE BENEATH VEHICLE WHEELS
2y 6m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12486709
ACTUATOR MECHANISM
3y 1m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12421923
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE FOR GASEOUS FUELS
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+17.3%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 390 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month