Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/936,364

LINEAR CLUTCH AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 28, 2022
Examiner
RASHID, MAHBUBUR
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Blanking Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
588 granted / 871 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
904
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
74.1%
+34.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 871 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/23/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-20 in the reply filed on 01/05/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the restriction between alleged Species A, B and Cis improper and respectfully requests withdrawal of the restriction and rejoinder of all species and claims associated therewith. This is found persuasive and previously withdrawn from consideration as a result of a restriction requirement, claims 8, 13 and 17 hereby rejoined and fully examined. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (KR 20140013624 A). Regarding claim 16, Kim discloses a locking assembly (fig. 3) for a linear clutch, the locking assembly (note the right side locking arrangement as shown in fig. 3) comprising: a first wedge (15 and 17a) comprising: a first surface; and a second surface (17b) opposite the first surface, the second surface comprising a taper extending into the first wedge from the second surface toward the first surface; a first spring (23) configured to bias the first wedge; a first bearing assembly (19) configured to fit within the taper of the first wedge and comprising a first roller bearing (19); and a lever (27) configured to engage the wedge and to move between an unlocked position and a locked position. Re-claim 17, Kim discloses (note the left side locking arrangement as shown in fig. 3) a second spring; a second wedge (note the left side wedge members as shown in fig. 3) configured to engage the second spring and the lever, the second wedge comprising: a first surface; and a second surface opposite the first surface, the second surface comprising a taper extending into the first wedge from the second surface toward the first surface; and a second bearing assembly configured to fit within the taper of the second wedge and comprising a first roller bearing. Re-claim 18, Kim discloses the first wedge (15 and 17a) further comprises an opening therein configured to receive the first spring (23). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 are allowed. Claims 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHBUBUR RASHID whose telephone number is (571)272-7218. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am to 10pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ROBERT SICONOLFI can be reached at 5712727124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAHBUBUR RASHID/Examiner, Art Unit 3616 /Robert A. Siconolfi/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2022
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680585
WET BRAKE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A VEHICLE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679140
Two-Way Band Brake for a Caster
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674496
BRAKE ASSEMBLY
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669161
BEARING AND A METHOD FOR PRODUCING A BEARING
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662091
VEHICLE EMERGENCY BRAKING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+20.6%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 871 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month