Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/942,345

Transmission or Reception Configuration Method and Electronic Device

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 12, 2022
Priority
Mar 13, 2020 — CN 202010177055.5 +1 more
Examiner
APPIAH, CHARLES NANA
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
27 granted / 59 resolved
-16.2% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
83
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
61.2%
+21.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 59 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/02/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 3-6, 8-11, and 13-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11, 13-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 11, the preamble of the claim recites “a transmission or reception configuration method, applied to a second electronic device,” yet all of the recited method steps are directed to configuring a first electronic device, and there are no steps recited as being performed by, or applied to, the second electronic device. The claim fails to clearly identify which device is performing the method steps, or how the second electronic device is involved in the method. As such, it is unclear as to who or what is performing the recited steps. This renders the claim indefinite. In other words, there are zero steps performed by the second electronic device. There are zero steps applied to the second electronic device. There is no indication that the second electronic device is somehow remotely configuring the first electronic device. It is unclear what constitute the are no limitations here that would be given patentable weight, since all of the limitations pertain to the configuration of a first device, and the method applies to a second device instead. This claim is indefinite and not properly enabled due to the gaps in limitations. Claims 13-17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) due to their respective dependencies on claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-6, 8-10 and 19 are allowed Claims 11, 13-17, and 20 would be allowable if amended to overcome the 112(b) rejection set forth in this action.. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kung et al. (US 20210227465 A1) discloses a method for logical channel prioritization regarding sidelink discontinuous reception. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES N APPIAH whose telephone number is (571)272-7904. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-5:30 M-TH. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES N APPIAH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Sep 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 09, 2026
Response Filed
May 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750803
SIDELINK POSITIONING ANCHOR CLASSIFICATION AND SELECTION
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744840
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12724157
EXTENDED WIDE-LANE CARRIER PHASE AVAILABILITY USING INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNIT (IMU) FEEDBACK
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12652342
HANDHELD ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647898
CONTROL SIGNALING FOR REPEATERS WITH ENERGY TRANSFER
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+16.8%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 59 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month