Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/945,108

BABY CARRIAGE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 15, 2022
Priority
Sep 16, 2021 — CN 202111089505.6 +1 more
Examiner
FRICK, EMMA K
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
4 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
353 granted / 501 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
520
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 501 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION In the reply filed 9/8/2025, claim 18 is amended, and new claim 26 is added. Claims 1-16, 18-26 are currently pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/8/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 18-21 and 24-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ruggiero (US 10,239,550). Regarding claim 18, Ruggiero teaches: a baby carriage comprising: a handle (110); a first fixing member (including at least elements 112, 134) connected to an end of the handle; and a seat (300) configured to be installed on the first fixing member, the seat comprising: a support base (including at least element 348B) configured to detachably connect connected to the first fixing member; a backrest (312) connected to the support base; a foot rest (310) pivotally connected to the support base; and a lock member (components which facilitate locking of seat elements, including at least elements 314, 320, 332, 362, 366) disposed between the support base and the foot rest, the lock member locking the foot rest at a second unfolded position with respect to the backrest (column 10, lines 51-55); wherein, when the foot rest rotates with respect to the backrest, the foot rest drives the lock member to unlock (rotation of the foot rest with respect to the backrest keeps element 320 disengaged from element 314, and moves element 332 into and unlocking position). Relevant elements are best shown in Figs. 1, 13-17. Regarding claim 19, Ruggiero further teaches: wherein the seat further comprises a third elastic member (364) disposed between the foot rest and the lock member; when the foot rest drives the lock member to unlock, the lock member compresses the third elastic member. See Fig. 14. Regarding claim 20, Ruggiero further teaches: wherein the support base comprises a third pivot portion (see the portion of element 348A extending along axis P1), the foot rest comprises a fourth pivot portion (314), and the third pivot portion is inserted into the fourth pivot portion, such that the foot rest is pivotally connected to the support base. See Fig. 14. Regarding claim 21, Ruggiero further teaches: wherein the foot rest comprise an accommodating recess (inside element 314), the lock member (362) is movably disposed in the accommodating recess; the lock member is configured to rotate with the foot rest. See Fig. 14. Regarding claim 24, Ruggiero further teaches: wherein the seat further comprises an armbar (including at least elements 304, 330, 342) pivotally connected to the foot rest, the foot rest comprises a guiding groove (340), the armbar comprises a guiding pillar (342), and the guiding pillar is inserted into the guiding groove; when the foot rest is folded or unfolded with respect to the backrest, an end portion of the guiding groove pushes the guiding pillar to drive the armbar to be folded or unfolded with respect to the backrest. See Figs. 15, 16. Regarding claim 25, Ruggiero further teaches: wherein the armbar is detachably and pivotally connected to the foot rest. Pivoting is shown in Figs. 15-16. The armbar is detachably connected at least by being capable of disassembly; see Fig. 14. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 and 26 are allowed. Claims 22-23 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 22 requires: “the support base comprises a second inclined driving surface; when the foot rest rotates with respect to the backrest from the second unfolded position, the second inclined driving surface pushes the lock member to move toward the foot rest, so as to drive the lock member to unlock.” These features are not reasonably taught by Ruggiero, and it would not be obvious to modify Ruggiero to arrive at the invention as set forth by claim 22. Claim 23 is allowable at least because it depends from claim 22. Please also see reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter is the Office Action mailed 3/14/2025. Response to Arguments/Remarks Applicant's arguments filed 9/8/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s remarks are made with regard to prior art no longer relied upon. Amendments to the claims necessitated a new ground(s) of rejection. Arguments have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Applicant's arguments were made with respect to the claims, as amended, and have been rejected/addressed as provided above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMMA K FRICK whose telephone number is (571)270-5403. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM EST M, T, F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4324. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EMMA K FRICK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
May 30, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 05, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673714
Wagon with Reclining Seat for Carrying Children
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673710
Foldable Cart
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668292
VEHICLE FRAME AND STROLLER
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662196
APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR TIRE CATCHERS FOR FRAME BASED VEHICLE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654528
Differential Drive System
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+20.2%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 501 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month