Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/950,735

Oral Care Compositions and Methods

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Priority
Sep 22, 2021 — provisional 63/247,056
Examiner
ROBERTS, LEZAH
Art Unit
1612
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Colgate-Palmolive Company
OA Round
5 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
6-7
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
374 granted / 772 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
844
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 772 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicants' arguments, filed June 11, 2026, have been fully considered. Rejections and/or objections not reiterated from previous office actions are hereby withdrawn. The following rejections and/or objections are either reiterated or newly applied. They constitute the complete set presently being applied to the instant application. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims Claim Objection (New Objection) Claim 10 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 10 recites “by wt. % of guanidine by wt. of the total composition, in free or orally acceptable salt form. It is suggested that claim be amended “0.1 to 5.0% of the guanidine in free or salt form by weight of the total composition” to make the claim consistent with the rest of the claim and claim 1, and also to remove one of “wt.%”. Appropriate correction is required. Also see Indefinite rejection below in regards to the recitation of “free form”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 (New Rejections) Indefiniteness The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “guanidine in free form or salt form”. It further defines the guanidine as a specific salt. The claim is indefinite insofar as the guanidine when further defined does not include a “free form”, making the claim indefinite. It is suggested the claim read “guanidine in salt form” or “a guanidine”. Not Further Limiting The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fourth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 13-14 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 1 defines the guanidine as specific salts. Claims 13-14 and 16 does not further define the listed guanidine salts. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. It is suggested that applicant cancel the claims due to the indicated allowable subject matter indicated in the Office Action mailed March 11, 2026. Conclusion Claims 1-17 and 19-20 are rejected. No claims allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEZAH ROBERTS whose telephone number is (571)272-1071. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11:00-7:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sahana Kaup can be reached on 571-272-6897. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEZAH ROBERTS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jun 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 04, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 11, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 31, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734116
CATIONIC MATERIAL FOR TOOTH DESENSITIZATION, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12702631
Oral Care Compositions Comprising Hops Beta Acids And Fluoride Ions
1y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697288
COMPOSITION FOR ORAL CAVITY
5y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691045
Rheological Solid Composition for Use in Shaving
5y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12661309
PREPARATION AND EFFICACY OF TOOTH WHITENING TABLET INCLUDING SHMP
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+35.1%)
4y 1m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 772 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month