Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 17/951,065

INORGANIC SOLID ELECTROLYTE-CONTAINING COMPOSITION, SHEET FOR ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND MANUFACTURING METHODS FOR SHEET FOR ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY AND ALL-SOLID STATE SECONDARY BATTERY

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2022
Priority
Mar 27, 2020 — JP 2020-059085 +2 more
Examiner
LI, AIQUN
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
4 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
536 granted / 837 resolved
-1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 837 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-4 and 6-14 are pending as amended on 25 June 2026. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Applicant’s amendments to the claims and the remarks/arguments have been entered and fully considered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 9 June 2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment and Arguments Applicant’s amendment does not distinguish from US2017/0352917A1 (Makino). Applicant’s arguments in light of the amendment have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Makino does not teach the specific residue structure of Formula (S3) and Expression (3b) as amended. The examiner disagrees. Makino explicitly teaches that the content of the compound (B) is preferably present in an amount of 0.1% by mass or more ([0223]), which anticipates the embodiment of 0.1% and meets the claimed α and expression (1). Makino further exemplifies a compound B-2 ([0221]): PNG media_image1.png 126 502 media_image1.png Greyscale Wherein PNG media_image2.png 400 662 media_image2.png Greyscale thus the group PNG media_image3.png 100 226 media_image3.png Greyscale is a 4-valenet branched group, which meets the claimed formula (S-3) wherein L6 is a single bond or a -CH2- group (i.e., R minus the end -CH2- of each of the four branches connected through S to a polymer), L7 is sulfur and n is 4. Makino discloses that B-2 has a molecular weight of 21000 ([0345], compound B-2), which meets the claimed Mw and expression (2), and anticipates the claimed expression (3b) since (-4.4X105X0.1+3.4X105)= 296000 when the content of the compound (B-2) is 0.1% by mass ([0223]). As such, Makino teaches the specific residue structure of Formula (S3) and Expression (3b) as amended. Applicant maintains that Makino exemplifies a binder content of 3 to 4% which is outside the claimed range. However, MPEP 2123 II [R-08.2012] states: “Disclosed examples and preferred embodiments do not constitute a teaching away from a broader disclosure or nonpreferred embodiments” . In re Susi, 440 F.2d 442, 169 USPQ 423 (CCPA 1971). Furthermore, "[t]he prior art’s mere disclosure of more than one alternative does not constitute a teaching away from any of these alternatives because such disclosure does not criticize, discredit, or otherwise discourage the solution claimed…." In re Fulton, 391 F.3d 1195, 1201, 73 USPQ2d 1141, 1146 (Fed. Cir. 2004). Applicant argues that the instant parameters/structure combination provide surface smoothness of A rating and excellent low temperature ion-conductivity, however, Makino teaches the instantly claimed structure, molecular weight and content which satisfy the claimed parameters therefore would inherently results in similar properties. As such the rejection over Makino stands. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1-12 stand and new claims 13-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Makino. Regarding claims 1, 2, 9 and 12-14, Makino teaches an all solid state secondary battery comprises a positive electrode active material layer; a negative electrode active material layer; and an inorganic solid electrolyte layer disposed between the positive electrode active material layer and the negative electrode active material layer, in which at least one layer of the positive electrode active material layer, the negative electrode active material layer, or the inorganic solid electrolyte layer includes a solid electrolyte composition ([0042]), wherein the solid electrolyte composition comprises: an inorganic solid electrolyte (A) having a conductivity of ions of metals belonging to Group I or II of the periodic table; and a compound (B) ([0012]), wherein the compound (B) comprises polymers or copolymers of vinyl monomer residues such as methacrylic acid ([0150][, [0165[ and [0169]-[0171]), which meets the claimed polymer binder (B). Makino teaches that the content of the compound (B) is present in an amount preferably 0.1% by mass or more of the total solid content of the solid electrolyte([0223]), which anticipates the embodiment of 0.1% by mass and meets the claimed α and expression (1). Makino further exemplifies a compound B has the structure of (B-2) ([0221]): PNG media_image1.png 126 502 media_image1.png Greyscale Wherein PNG media_image2.png 400 662 media_image2.png Greyscale thus the group PNG media_image3.png 100 226 media_image3.png Greyscale is a 4-valenet branched group, which meets the claimed formula (S-3) wherein L6 is a single bond or a -CH2- group (i.e., R minus the end -CH2- of each of the four branches connected through S to a polymer), L7 is sulfur and n is 4. Makino discloses that B-2 has a molecular weight of 21000 ([0345], compound B-2), which meets the claimed Mw and expression (2), and anticipates the claimed expression (3b) since (-4.4X105X0.1+3.4X105)= 296000 when the content of the compound (B-2) is 0.1% by mass ([0223]). Regarding claim 3, Makino teaches that the monomer residue comprises a hydrocarbon group having 8 or more carbon atoms in a side chain ([0163]), exemplified as a C16 residue ([0221], B-4). Regarding claim 4, Makino teaches a plurality of mercaptan are introduced into a terminal of the polymer ([0218] and [0221], B-2, 4, etc.). Regarding claim 6, Makino teaches that the inorganic solid electrolyte is sulfide-based ([0076]). Regarding claim 7, Makino teaches that the solid electrolyte comprises an active material ([0242]). Regarding claim 8, Makino teaches a sheet comprising the inorganic solid electrolyte layer ([0040]). Regarding claims 10 and 11, Makino teaches a method for manufacturing an electrode sheet for a battery, comprising: a step of applying the solid electrolyte composition using a coating method onto a collector to form an inorganic solid electrolyte-containing layer ([0041] and [0312]), and a method for manufacturing an all solid state secondary battery, in which an all solid state secondary battery is manufactured using the electrode sheet for a battery ([0049]). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AIQUN LI whose telephone number is (571)270-7736. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am -4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-2721302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AIQUN LI/Ph.D., Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Aug 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 05, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 25, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12689057
LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686807
Modified Graphite-Coated Soft Particle and Method for Preparing Same, and Profile Control and Water Shutoff Agent and Application Thereof
10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683246
SEPARATOR FOR NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY AND NON-AQUEOUS SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676338
SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL, BATTERY USING SAME, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID ELECTROLYTE MATERIAL
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665218
LITHIUM ION-CONDUCTING GARNET TYPE OXIDE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+22.4%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 837 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month