Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/951,392

COLLABORATION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR REALIZING ONLINE OFFSITE SYNCHRONOUS ENSEMBLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 23, 2022
Examiner
DONELS, JEFFREY
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Chunghwa Telecom Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1115 granted / 1295 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§103
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§102
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§112
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1295 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to be/cause of the following informalities: the term “servo” is indefinite. Is this a translation error and did Applicant mean the word “server”? . Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claims 1-20, the term “servo” is indefinite. Is this a translation error and did Applicant mean the word “server”? Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3,6-8,11-13,15-17,20 is/are rejected (to the extent understood) under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being fully met by DESIGN M PLUS (JP 6864938 B1) (“DESIGN”). Paragraph numbers are from Espacenet. Regarding Claims 1,11,20, DESIGN discloses a collaboration system for realizing online offsite synchronous ensemble (para. 0050), comprising: a controlling device 81 in a first place; at least one controlled device 811-814 in at least one second place different from the first place, wherein the controlling device 81 is connected or communicated with the controlled device via a network 103; and a server device 101 connecting or communicating with the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 via the network 103, wherein the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 respectively receive a music score (e.g. para. 0020) of a same song from the server device 101 before performing the synchronous ensemble of the same song via the network or online, wherein the controlling device 81 sets a note starting position (bar position) regarding the music score of the same song when the same song is performed, and the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 synchronize the note starting position (bar position) of the music score of the same song, such that when the controlling device executes a start playing command of the music score of the same song, the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 start to play the music score of the same song note by note synchronously according to the note starting position of the music score of the same song (paras. 0050-0053). Regarding Claims 2,12, DESIGN discloses the controlling device 81 has a first audio capture module 803, a first communication module and a first audio playing module (terminals are smartphones with network connections and speakers, not numbered, para. 0021), and the controlled device 811-814 has a second audio capture module 803, a second communication module and a second audio playing module (terminals are smartphones with network connections and speakers, para. 0021), wherein the first audio capture module 803 and the second audio capture module 803 capture a live audio of the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 respectively to transmit the audio of the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 respectively to the server device 101 via the first communication module and the second communication module, such that the audio of both the controlling device 81 and the controlled device 811-814 collected by the server device 101 is played synchronously by the first audio playing module and the second audio playing module (paras. 0050-0053). Regarding Claims 3,13, DESIGN discloses the server device 101 has a music score database (para. 0020). DESIGN also teaches a plurality of terminals 811-814, a second terminal of which reads on a third audio capture module 803, an audio collection module and a third communication module (see above) which would function as a controlled device 811-814. Regarding Claims 6,15, DESIGN discloses the controlling device 81 has a first music score data receiving unit 505, a note starting position controlling unit and a first music score data playing unit (para. 0051), wherein the first music score data receiving unit 505 receives the music score from the server device 101, the note starting position controlling unit sets the note starting position and a start playing time T1 of the music score of the controlling device 81, and the first music score data playing unit plays the music score from the server device 101 (para. 0051). Regarding Claims 7,16, DESIGN discloses the controlled device 811-814 has a second music score data receiving unit 505, a note starting position controlled unit and a second music score data playing unit (para. 0053), wherein the second music score data receiving unit 505 receives the music score from the server device 101, the note starting position controlled unit receives a command from the controlling device 81 (via server 101) to set the note starting position and a start playing time of the music score of the controlled device 811-814, and the second music score data playing unit plays the music score from the server device 101 (para. 0053). Regarding Claims 8,17, DESIGN discloses the controlling device 81 has a note starting position controlling unit and a first music score data playing unit (para. 0051), a first communication module (see above), and the controlled device 811-814 has a note starting position controlled unit and a second music score data playing unit (para. 0053), a second communication module (see above), wherein the note starting position controlling unit of the controlling device 81 shares a sequencing information of the note starting position to the controlled device 811-814 via the first communication module (via server 101), such that the note starting position controlled unit of the controlled device 811-814 receives the sequencing information of the note starting position via the second communication module (via server 101), wherein the sequencing information of the note starting position of the controlling device 81 is presented in the first music score data playing unit, and the sequencing information of the note starting position of controlled device 811-814 is presented in the second music score data playing unit (paras. 0050-0053). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4,5,9,10,14,18,19 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The references cited show related teachings in the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY DONELS whose telephone number is (571)272-2061. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at (571) 270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEFFREY . DONELS Examiner Art Unit 2837 /JEFFREY DONELS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595155
ELEVATOR SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586485
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING LYRICS AND CHORDS FOR USER INTERFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573361
PICKUP DEVICES OPTIMISED FOR AMPLIFYING AN ACOUSTIC GUITAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565403
ELEVATOR SYSTEM WITH SIMPLIFIED POWER SUPPLY FOR SHAFT DOOR ASSEMBLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12545550
ELEVATOR PARKING BRAKE, A METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM AND AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1295 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month