Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/952,021

UNIFORM LIGHT HALO FOR SINGLE KEYBOARD KEY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 23, 2022
Priority
Sep 24, 2021 — provisional 63/248,359
Examiner
CAROC, LHEIREN MAE ANGLO
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
782 granted / 1004 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1033
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.3%
+24.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings were received on 04/22/2025. These drawings are unacceptable. The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the enclosure including enclosure cutouts aligning with the at least two slot openings as recited in claim 6, in combination with the limitations of claims 1 and 5 from which claim 6 depends, the reflector including one or more slot openings that correspond to the enclosure cutouts of the enclosure as recited in claim 7, in combination with the limitations of claims 1, 5, and 6, from which claim 7 depends, the floor of the enclosure as recited in claim 11, in combination with the limitations of claims 1, 5, 6 and 8, from which claim 11 depends, the enclosure comprising enclosure cutouts aligning with the at least two slot openings as recited in claim 16, in combination with the limitations of claim 15 from which claim 16 depends, the reflector including one or more slot openings that correspond to the enclosure cutouts of the enclosure as recited in claim 18, in combination with the limitations of claims 15 and 16, from which claim 18 depends, and the dot openings and slot openings of the reflector and light guide panel and the light guide panel lens array as recited in claim 20, in combination with the limitations of claim 19, from which claim 20 depends must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 6-8, 10, 11, 16-18 and 20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. In regard to claim 6, the Specification and Drawings do not adequately describe the enclosure including enclosure cutouts aligning with the at least two slot openings, in combination with the limitations of claims 1 and 5, from which claim 6 depends. In regard to claim 7, the Specification and Drawings do not adequately describe the reflector including one or more slot openings that correspond to enclosure cutouts, in combination with the limitations of claims 1, 5 and 6, from which claim 7 depends. In regard to claim 11, the Specification and Drawings do not adequately describe the enclosure including edge walls forming a sharp angle with a floor of the enclosure to allow illumination of the periphery of the key to be driven by reflections from the floor of the enclosure, in combination with the limitations claims 1, 5, 6 and 8, from which claim 11 depends. In regard to claim 16, the Specification and Drawings do not adequately describe the enclosure comprising enclosure cutouts aligning with the at least two slot openings, in combination with the limitations of claim 15, from which claim 16 depends. In regard to claim 18, the Specification and Drawings do not adequately describe the reflector including one or more slot openings that correspond to enclosure cutouts, in combination with the limitations of claims 15 and 16, from which claim 18 depends. In regard to claim 20, the Specification and Drawings do not adequately describe dot openings and slot of openings of the reflector and light guide plate and the light guide plate lens array, in combination with the limitations of claim 19, from which claim 20 depends. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 12, 14, 15 and 19 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 04/22/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The amendments to the drawings do not adequately address the objections to the drawings or the rejection of claims 6-8, 10, 11, 16-18 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as detailed above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LHEIREN MAE A CAROC whose telephone number is (571)272-2730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LHEIREN MAE A CAROC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2833
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 16 earlier events
Jul 29, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 01, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 15, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676269
OPERATING DEVICE OF HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665141
ACTUATION UNIT FOR A SWITCHING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658386
BREAK MECHANISM FOR SWITCHING APPARATUS AND SWITCHING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651715
ROTATION DETECTION DEVICE AND STYLUS PEN
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12646669
Module for Generating Opening Signals
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month