Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/956,094

SIDELINK TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 29, 2022
Examiner
ROUDANI, OUSSAMA
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
OA Round
4 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
369 granted / 465 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
492
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 465 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, submitted on 10/14/2025, have been considered but they are moot in view of new ground(s). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1, 6-8, 13, 15, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ryu et al. (US 20220407634) in view of Jiang et al. (US 20250184966). Regarding claim 1, Ryu discloses an information feedback apparatus, applicable to a first terminal equipment side, the apparatus comprising: a memory; and processor circuitry coupled to the memory (Figs. 2A, 24-26) and configured to: receive sidelink control information, the sidelink control information being used to indicate the first terminal equipment to perform hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback, wherein HARQ feedback information comprises only NACK (Negative acknowledgment) (reception UE may not transmit ACK when the decoding of PSSCH transmitted from the transmission UE is successful, and transmit NACK via PSFCH only when decoding failed; [0135]. transmission UE may transmit, to the reception UE, SL HARQ feedback enabling information via SCI; [0432]), receive sidelink data transmitted by a second terminal equipment; decode the received sidelink data at the first terminal equipment (reception UE may transmit ACK via PSFCH when decoding of PSSCH transmitted from an NR V2X transmission UE is successful; [0135]); determine, at the first terminal equipment, a decoding result for the received sidelink data (the V2X reception UE may transmit ACK/NACK information indicating success or failure of decoding of SL data to the V2X transmission UE on PSFCH; [0152]); at the first terminal equipment, instruct a physical layer of the first terminal equipment to generate HARQ feedback information, when a value of a one-bit HARQ feedback indicator field in the sidelink control information is set to 1 (transmission UE may transmit, to the reception UE, a 1-bit indicator of whether to enable HARQ operation via SCI. ‘0’ may denote disabling of SL HARQ operation and ‘1’ may denote enabling of SL HARQ operation; [0426]) and NACK-only is indicated by the sidelink control information (reception UE may transmit NACK via PSFCH only when decoding failed; [0135] Transmission UE may transmit, to the reception UE, SL HARQ feedback enabling information via SCI. Upon receiving SCI, the physical layer and MAC layer of the reception UE may not transmit PSFCH according to ‘00’ indicator of SCI. Upon receiving SCI, the physical layer and MAC layer of the reception UE may not transmit PSFCH according to ‘00’ indicator of SCI even when a cast type is not identified; [0432-0433]) and when the first terminal equipment is within a communication range of the second terminal equipment and the decoding result is being not correctly decoded at the first terminal equipment (NACK information may be transmitted only when decoding of received PSSCH is failed. UEs transmitting NACK information may transmit the NACK information only when a specific condition is satisfied. UE-B and UE-C may determine an additional condition. Such a condition may be a distance to the UE-A; [0260]); and generate NACK and transmit the generated NACK to the second terminal equipment when the first terminal equipment is within the communication range of the second terminal equipment and the sidelink data is not correctly decoded (NACK information may be transmitted only when decoding of received PSSCH is failed. UEs transmitting NACK information may transmit the NACK information only when a specific condition is satisfied. UE-B and UE-C may determine an additional condition. Such a condition may be a distance to the UE-A; [0260]). Ryu does not expressly disclose decode received data at a MAC layer; and determine, at the MAC layer, a decoding result for the received data; at the MAC layer, instruct a physical layer to generate HARQ feedback information when the decoding result is being not correctly decoded at the MAC layer. In an analogous art, Jiang discloses decode received data at a MAC layer; and determine, at the MAC layer, a decoding result for the received data (The MAC sublayer 302 provides multiplexing between a logical channel and a transport channel. The MAC sublayer 302 is also responsible for allocating between first communication nodes various radio resources (i.e., resource block) in a cell. The MAC sublayer 302 is also in charge of HARQ operation; [0198]); at the MAC layer, instruct a physical layer to generate HARQ feedback information when the decoding result is being not correctly decoded at the MAC layer (PSFCH channel is introduced for HARQ transmission on sidelink. the HARQ feedback selection 1 is to only feed back a NACK, and the HARQ feedback selection 2 is to feed back both an ACK and a NACK; [0005, 0015]. The L1 is called PHY 301 in the present disclosure. The layer 2 (L2) 305 is above the PHY 301, and is in charge of a link between a first communication node and a second communication node, as well as two UEs via the PHY 301. L2 305 comprises a Medium Access Control (MAC) sublayer 302. The MAC sublayer 302 is also in charge of HARQ operation; [0198]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to add the features taught by Jiang into the system of Ryu in order to in order to improve the transmission and spectral efficiency of a feedback channel for a sidelink (Jiang; [0012]). Regarding claim 6, the combination of Ryu and Jiang, particularly Ryu discloses wherein the sidelink control information further used to indicate the first terminal equipment to perform groupcast communication with HARQ feedback information only comprising NACK (When HARQ-ACK/NACK is mentioned in the embodiments of the disclosure, PSSCH may be unicast or groupcast PSSCH configured or indicated to transmit HARQ-ACK/NACK; [0296]). Regarding claim 7, the combination of Ryu and Jiang, particularly Ryu discloses wherein the sidelink control information further comprises: location information of the second terminal equipment and/or the communication range (SCI includes information about a location of the transmission UE (for example, zone ID or at least one of altitude or latitude of the transmission UE) and a range requirement; [0438]). Regarding claim 8, the combination of Ryu and Jiang, particularly Ryu discloses wherein the processor circuitry is further configured to perform the HARQ feedback according to the location information of the second terminal equipment and/or the communication range in the sidelink control information (NACK information may be transmitted only when decoding of received PSSCH is failed. UEs transmitting NACK information may transmit the NACK information only when a specific condition is satisfied. UE-B and UE-C may determine an additional condition. Such a condition may be a distance to the UE-A; [0260]). Regarding claim 13, the combination of Ryu and Jiang, particularly Ryu discloses when the first terminal equipment is within the communication range of the second terminal equipment and the sidelink data is not correctly decoded, determine at an MAC layer whether a layer 1 destination address ID indicated in a sidelink control information (SCI) is equal to lower 16 bits of a layer 2 ID of the first terminal equipment; and when a determination result is yes, generate HARQ feedback, and transmit the generated HARQ feedback information to the second terminal equipment (transmission UE may set an indicator to ‘1’ and transmit the source ID configured of 8 bits and the destination ID configured of 16 bits to the reception UE via SCI. Here, when the even number of source ID and/or destination ID are detected, the physical layer of the reception UE may determine unicast communication. When the odd number of source ID and/or destination ID are detected, the physical layer of the reception UE may determine groupcast communication. As for another example, the source ID configured of 8 bits and the destination ID configured of 16 bits may be converted into a decimal number and when the source ID and/or destination ID is equal to or greater than a certain threshold value (or greater than the threshold value), the physical layer of the reception UE may determine unicast communication; [0437]). Regarding claim 15, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 1. Regarding claim 19, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 6. Regarding claim 20, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 7. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Seidel et al. (US 20210167897), “LOW LATENCY HARQ PROTOCOL FOR URLLC SERVICES.” Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OUSSAMA ROUDANI whose telephone number is (571)272-4727. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached on (571) 272 7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OUSSAMA ROUDANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 21, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jul 07, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 14, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604228
EVENT-TRIGGERED CROSS-LINK INTERFERENCE MEASUREMENT REPORTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592796
USER TERMINAL AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587424
REARRANGEMENT SCHEME FOR LOW PEAK-TO-AVERAGE POWER RATIO FASTER-THAN-NYQUIST WAVEFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562957
SELF-CONFIGURATION OF WIRELESS CONNECTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556249
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM BASED ON MMWAVE RF REPEATERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 465 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month