Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/956,986

CORNER MODULE APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 30, 2022
Priority
Nov 23, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0162194 +1 more
Examiner
FRICK, EMMA K
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
352 granted / 499 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
516
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.3%
+21.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 499 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION In the reply filed 2/27/2026, claims 1, 8, and 12 have been amended. Claims 1-6, 8-19 and 21 are currently pending, with claims 2-4, 9-11, 13-19 are withdrawn. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/27/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, there is insufficient antecedent basis for the main fastening part. The main fastening part is introduced in claim 5: “wherein the main platform comprises: a main plate configured to seat the battery; a main wheel housing extended from the main plate and configured to have the corner module accommodated therein; and a main fastening part provided in the main plate and the main wheel housing.” Claim 1 has been amended to include the limitations of claim 7 (previously indicated allowable). Claim 7 had depended from claim 5, however the limitations of claim 5 are not incorporated into claim 1. Applicant’s remarks suggest claim 1 should be allowed due to the incorporation of allowable subject matter into claim 1. For this reason, it is believed that Applicant had intended to also include the limitations of claim 5 into claim 1 (which would yield sufficient antecedent basis for claimed terms and allowability). For the purpose of examination, the claims have been interpreted such that claim 1 also includes the limitations of claim 5, yielding sufficient antecedent basis to the main fastening part. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 21 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter may be found in the prior action (1/2/2026). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMMA K FRICK whose telephone number is (571)270-5403. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM EST M, T, F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4324. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EMMA K FRICK/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 16, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630209
SEAT AND BABY CARRIAGE
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617442
COLLAPSIBLE WAGON WITH FOLDABLE HANDLE AND BASKET EXTENSION
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617448
STROLLER AND REVERSIBLE MECHANISM THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12594979
FOLDING STROLLER ADAPTABLE FOR SINGLE OR DOUBLE OCCUPANTS
3y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583555
ELECTRIC BALANCE BIKE
3y 7m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+20.0%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 499 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month